Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) reduces the recurrence of VT in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The appropriate timing of VT ablation and its effects on mortality and heart failure progression remain a matter of debate. In patients with life-threatening arrhythmias necessitating ICD implantation, we compared outcomes of preventive VT ablation (undertaken before ICD implantation to prevent ICD shocks for VT) and deferred ablation after 3 ICD shocks for VT. Methods: The BERLIN VT study (Preventive Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Myocardial Infarction) was a prospective, open, parallel, randomized trial performed at 26 centers. Patients with stable ischemic cardiomyopathy, a left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 50%, and documented VT were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive or deferred ablation strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and unplanned hospitalization for either symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia or worsening heart failure. Secondary outcomes included sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia and appropriate ICD therapy. We hypothesized that preventive ablation strategy would be superior to deferred ablation strategy in the intention-to-treat population. Results: During a mean follow-up of 396±284 days, the primary end point occurred in 25 (32.9%) of 76 patients in the preventive ablation group and 23 (27.7%) of 83 patients in the deferred ablation group (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.62–1.92]; P =0.77). On the basis of prespecified criteria for interim analyses, the study was terminated early for futility. In the preventive versus deferred ablation group, 6 versus 2 patients died (7.9% versus 2.4%; P =0.18), 8 versus 2 patients were admitted for worsening heart failure (10.4% versus 2.3%; P =0.062), and 15 versus 21 patients were hospitalized for symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia (19.5% versus 25.3%; P =0.27). Among secondary outcomes, the proportions of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (39.7% versus 48.2%; P =0.050) and appropriate ICD therapy (34.2% versus 47.0%; P =0.020) were numerically reduced in the preventive ablation group. Conclusions: Preventive VT ablation before ICD implantation did not reduce mortality or hospitalization for arrhythmia or worsening heart failure during 1 year of follow-up compared with the deferred ablation strategy. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02501005.

No abstract

Background: Several studies have analyzed arrhythmias in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and increased P-wave duration was identified as a risk factor for development of atrial fibrillation (AF 79.4 ± 5.4 months (sinus rhythm), (p = 0.565). Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation predict adverse prognosis in patients with PH and a longer P-wave (> 0.11 s) is associated with shorter survival time. (Cardiol J 2016; 23, 4: 465-472)

In this study we proved for the first time the validity and applicability of the experimentally acquired formula for the evaluation of the QT interval in the presence of LBBB in a clinical setting.

No abstract

Administration of ANT was highly effective in suppressing AF. The antiarrhythmic effect could be explained by a significant increase in postrepolarization refractoriness as a result of a more marked increase in aERP as compared with aAPD.

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia and one of the major causes of stroke, heart failure, sudden death, and cardiovascular morbidity. Despite substantial advances in (interventional) rhythm control treatment during the last decade, anticoagulation for stroke prevention remains a major component of AF treatment.HypothesisThere are important sex‐specific differences in AF‐related stroke, resulting from sex‐specific mechanisms and therapeutic differences.MethodsThis review summarizes available data on sex differences in risk assessment and prevention of stroke and highlights current knowledge gaps in AF‐related stroke mechanisms, prevention and management that warrant further research.ResultsIncreased thrombotic risk in women is multifactorial, involving hormonal changes after menopause, structural, endocrine and lifestyle/social factors and their interactions. It is clear from randomized studies that women benefit from anticoagulant treatment and that their bleeding risk is similar to men. Women should therefore receive equivalent treatment to men, based on the validated criteria for anticoagulation therapy. However, women are not represented equally in the large randomized studies and sex‐related information in many fields is lacking.ConclusionsFemale sex is an established risk factor for stroke in AF patients. The evidence for sex‐specific differences in stroke risk assessment and stroke prevention is accumulating. However, the underlying biological mechanisms remain incompletely understood and further studies are required in order to decrease AF‐related morbidity and mortality.

The Bogossian formula is a reliable tool for QTc interval evaluation in pacemaker patients with LBBB due to apical or non-apical RV pacing. However, an overestimation of 30 ms should be included in the calculation.