Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal coil MRI are comparable methods in the preoperative staging and early diagnosis of recurrent rectal cancer. The advantages of EUS are the small diameter of the instrument, availability, and lower costs. In contrast, EMRI is operator-independent, and may become important for combined local and distant staging and follow-up examination in rectal cancer, if contrast-enhanced imaging can improve the sensitivity for liver metastases.
Despite improved surgical techniques there is still a risk of mortality in elective general surgery. In a prospective study preoperative data from 3250 patients were collected and compared with postoperative systemic complications, using univariate chi 2 analysis. Highly significant (P < 0.00001) variables were subjected to stepwise logistic regression analysis. The severity of operative procedure, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, symptoms of respiratory disease and malignancy were found to be significant risk factors predicting postoperative morbidity (P < 0.05). Using these four variables, a simple preoperative risk scoring system has been defined. Class A (up to 5 points) was defined as a low-risk group (systemic complication rate 5.0 per cent), class B (5-7 points) was intermediate risk (systemic complication rate 17.9 per cent) and class C (8-10 points) was high risk (systemic complication rate 33.3 per cent). Patients at high risk for perioperative and postoperative complications are more likely to be identified by this analysis than by using the ASA classification alone.
A number of studies have shown that ultrasound has an advantage over physical examination in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Most of these studies were conducted by experts in the field of ultrasonography. In this study the influence of experience on the results of the sonography of acute appendicitis were evaluated. All 203 patients admitted to our unit between December 1990 and December 1992 were examined physically and sonographically by a team of surgeons consisting of one experienced sonographer and six inexperienced surgical trainees. Laparotomy was performed in 136 patients (46%). Appendicitis was demonstrated histologically in 119 cases (39.4%). Initial clinical findings were positive in 87 (28.8%). Sonography was positive in 119 patients (39.4%). The 163 patients not operated on demonstrated other pathology on ultrasound in 60 cases (19.9%). The rate of negative laparotomies amounted to 7.2% in our study. Sensitivity and specificity for the sonographic diagnosis were 92% and 95%, respectively. They were only 81% and 80% for physical examination. Overall accuracy was 92% for sonography. Sensitivity and specificity for the inexperienced surgeons were 87% and 93%, respectively, while the experienced surgeon reached values of 97% and 98%, respectively. The results of both groups are comparable with values in the literature, suggesting that ultrasound evaluation of appendicitis is not a diagnostic tool limited to a few experienced sonographers.
In a national prospective multicenter study 3,722 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) performed by 179 surgeons in 50 institutions were analyzed with special regard to technique and complications. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in 259 patients (7.0%), either without intraoperative complications (4.5%) or due to intraoperative complications (2.5%). Three patients (0.08%) died within 30 days after operation and a total of 39 patients (1.0%) had to be reoperated; 22 (0.6%) bile duct injuries were registered. Common bile duct (CBD) stones were treated mainly by ERCP. In eight cases laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones was attempted, and it was performed successfully in six patients. Postoperatively patients were discharged home after a mean of 4.4 days and returned to work after 14.0 days (range: 2-28). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the golden standard to remove the gallbladder, but further development is needed to establish laparoscopic treatment of biliary tract stones in the near future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.