1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199607)62:3<222::aid-jso14>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter fracture: A rare complication of totally implantable subclavian venous access devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
27
1
10

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
27
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Although comparisons between patient groups are difficult, the 0.78 % incidence of catheter embolization seen in our study is consistent with the fracture and embolization rate of 0.1 to 2.1 % reported in other series [16,17]. Similar to patients described in other studies, our patient was asymptomatic after catheter fracture, and embolization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3). Although comparisons between patient groups are difficult, the 0.78 % incidence of catheter embolization seen in our study is consistent with the fracture and embolization rate of 0.1 to 2.1 % reported in other series [16,17]. Similar to patients described in other studies, our patient was asymptomatic after catheter fracture, and embolization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We concluded that the major reasonfor pinch-offwas caused by the compression of a catheter between the first rib and clavicles. It is observed in 1.1-5.0% of cases [6][7][8]. The complication of resistance causes myocardial or intravascular perforation, arrhythmia, endocarditis, pulmonary artery thrombosis or embolization and sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There wasa rare of 2.1% of complete occlusion in our institute.Kurul reported a catheter tip that rubs against the vein can produce a local thrombosis [14,15]. Nevertheless, precipitation from total parenteral nutrition, drugs, transfusion, or other intravenous solutions as well as particles that come from port membrane, port floor, or cutaneous tissue from punctures can obstruct the device [7,12]. Although we took a chest X-ray and computed tomography, we can carry out to exclude catheter malposition, kinking, disconnection, fracture and migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the large variety of catheter complications 3,4,7,8 and their impact on catheter function are well documented in the literature, catheter fragmentation with subsequent embolization is an event reported only sporadically (Table 1; 7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] ). Reviewing our experience with 763 percutaneously inserted soft silicon catheters (Hickman catheters and implantable port-a-caths) from 1992 to 2000 we identified catheter fragmentation in only the one patient described here (0.13%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of pinchoff syndrome grade 2 it is recommended that the CVC be removed, even when it is functioning normally. 13,14 Only thereby can the serious complication of fragmentation and embolization, possibly necessitaiting costly surgical techniques such as thoracotomy be prevented. 29 To summarize, catheter fragmentation is a rare but dangerous complication of CVC lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%