Conclusions: Gene expression profiling of human bladder cancers provides insight into the biology of bladder cancer progression and identifies patients with distinct clinical phenotypes.
our results demonstrate for the first time the complexity of the dissecting process on a molecular level. The ultimate dissection seems to be the dramatic endpoint of a long-lasting process of degradation and insufficient remodelling of the aortic wall. Altered patterns of gene expression suggest a pre-existing structural failure of the aortic wall, resulting in dissection.
Purpose: Our goal was to identify genes undergoing expressional changes shortly after the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.Experimental Design: The biopsies were taken from patients with primary breast cancer prior to any treatment and 24 hours after the beginning of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression analyses from matched pair samples representing 25 patients were carried out with Clontech filter arrays. A subcohort of those 25 paired samples were additionally analyzed with the Affymetrix GeneChip platform. All of the transcripts from both platforms were queried for expressional changes.Results: Performing hierarchical cluster analysis, we clustered pre-and posttreatment samples from individual patients more closely to each other than the samples taken from different patients. This reflects the rather low number of transcripts responding directly to the drugs used. Although transcriptional drug response occurring during therapy differed between individual patients, two genes (p21 WAF1/CIP1 and MIC-1) were up-regulated in posttreatment samples. This could be validated by semiquantitative and real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Partial leastdiscriminant analysis based on approximately 25 genes independently identified by either Clontech or Affymetrix platforms could clearly discriminate pre-and posttreatment samples. However, correlation of certain gene expression levels as well as of differential patterns and clusters as determined by a different platform was not always satisfying.Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the potential of monitoring posttreatment changes in gene expression as a measure of the pharmacodynamics of drugs. As a clinical laboratory model, it can be useful to identify patients with sensitive and reactive tumors and to help for optimized choice for sequential therapy and obviously improve relapsefree and overall survival.
The available clinical prognostic tools show an obvious limitation in predicting the outcome of breast cancer patients, and pathological features cannot classify tumours accurately. Microarray-based molecular classification of breast tumours or selection of gene expression panels to improve risk prediction or treatment outcomes are thought to be theoretically superior to established clinical and pathological criteria, based on guidelines such as the St Gallen and National Institute of Health consensus, or which use specific prognostic tools, such as the Nottingham Prognostic Index or Adjuvant-Online algorithm. Although two diagnostic tests based on gene expression profiling of breast cancer are commercially available, a new molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer based on expression profiling cannot outperform the standard tumour diagnostic at present. This review focuses on some important problems in the practical application of molecular profiling of breast cancer for clinical purposes.
Adoptive transfer of autologous tumor-specific lymphocytes represents a viable treatment method for patients with advanced malignancies. Here, we report a patient’s case with metastatic hormone-refractory New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) expressing prostate cancer treated with in vitro expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in conjunction with IL-2 and immune-checkpoint blockade. Complete and durable tumor remission was observed after three TIL infusions consisting of 1.4×109, 2.0×109, and 8.0×109T cells, respectively, lasting now for more than 3.5 years. Immunological correlates to the clinical development were the decrease of tumor-driven NY-ESO-1 serum antibody and the drop of prostate-specific antigen to <0.01 µg/L. TILs were reactive against cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1, individual tumor mutational proteins (eg, PRPF8, TRPS1), and the androgen receptor splice variant 12.
Background: Our goal was to identify gene signatures predictive of response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy (PST) with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in patients with primary breast cancer.
Viral vector systems are the most commonly used gene transfer tools for clinical gene therapy. However, lipofection systems are potential alternatives because of lower immunogenicity and easier cGMP production, but in vivo stability and transduction efficacy need to be improved. Therefore, we investigated gene transduction efficiency of our novel cGMP cationic lipids, CCQ22 and CCQ32, by FACS analysis. Toxicity analysis was performed to determine the cytotoxic side effects of the novel lipids. To evaluate the stability of the compounds in the context of local delivery to patients with intraperitoneally metastatic ovarian cancer, gene transfer was also tested in the presence of malignant ascites. Our novel cGMP standard lipids mediated gene transfer rates of more than 50%. However, for most cell lines cytotoxic side effects were similar to our reference lipofection system. In general, ascites had no major influence on gene transduction rates with the novel lipids. Our results suggest that CCQs may compare favorably with commercially available lipofection systems. These promising results facilitate further analysis of the compounds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.