Although a great deal is known about the signaling events that promote nuclear translocation of NF-κB, how cellular biophysics and the microenvironment might regulate the dynamics of this pathway is poorly understood. In this study, we used high-content image analysis and Bayesian network modeling to ask whether cell shape and context features influence NF-κB activation using the inherent variability present in unperturbed populations of breast tumor and non-tumor cell lines. Cell–cell contact, cell and nuclear area, and protrusiveness all contributed to variability in NF-κB localization in the absence and presence of TNFα. Higher levels of nuclear NF-κB were associated with mesenchymal-like versus epithelial-like morphologies, and RhoA-ROCK-myosin II signaling was critical for mediating shape-based differences in NF-κB localization and oscillations. Thus, mechanical factors such as cell shape and the microenvironment can influence NF-κB signaling and may in part explain how different phenotypic outcomes can arise from the same chemical cues.

Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) belongs to a family of transcription factors, originally implicated in antiviral responses and interferon production. However, studies conducted in different laboratories over the last decade have placed IRF5 as a central regulator of the inflammatory response. It has become clear that IRF5 contributes to the pathogenesis of many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and systemic lupus erythematosus. Given the role of IRF5 in physiology and disease, IRF5 represents a potential therapeutic target. However, despite a significant interest from the pharmaceutical industry, inhibitors that interfere with the IRF5 pathway remain elusive. Here, we review the advances made by various studies in targeting multiple steps of signalling leading to IRF5 activation with their therapeutic potential, and the possible complications of such strategies are discussed.

COVID-19 is characterised by profound lymphopenia in the peripheral blood, and the remaining T cells display altered phenotypes, characterised by a spectrum of activation and exhaustion. However, antigen-specific T cell responses are emerging as a crucial mechanism for both clearance of the virus and as the most likely route to long-lasting immune memory that would protect against re-infection. Therefore, T cell responses are also of considerable interest in vaccine development. Furthermore, persistent alterations in T cell subset composition and function post-infection have important implications for patients’ long-term immune function. In this review, we examine T cell phenotypes, including those of innate T cells, in both peripheral blood and lungs, and consider how key markers of activation and exhaustion correlate with, and may be able to predict, disease severity. We focus on SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells to elucidate markers which may indicate formation of antigen-specific T cell memory. We also examine peripheral T cell phenotypes in recovery and the likelihood of long-lasting immune disruption. Finally, we discuss T cell phenotypes in the lung as important drivers of both virus clearance and tissue damage. As our knowledge of the adaptive immune response to COVID-19 rapidly evolves, it has become clear that whilst some areas of the T cell response have been investigated in some detail, others, such as the T cell response in children remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this review will also highlight areas where T cell phenotypes require urgent characterisation.

Background Improved knowledge of different biomarkers is crucial for early diagnosis of rheumatic diseases and to provide important insights for clinical management. In this study, we evaluated the seroreactivity of patients with different connective tissue diseases (CTDs) (rheumatoid arthritis, RA; systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE; systemic sclerosis, SSc; and Sjogren’s syndrome, SSj) to interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) peptide and homologs derived from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). Antigen-induced arthritis (AIA) experiments have been performed in control and IRF5 conditional knockout mice to reinforce the hypothesis that antibodies generated against the three homologous peptides are cross-reactive. Methods Reactivity against wild-type (wt) and citrullinated (cit) IRF5 (IRF5 424-434 ), MAP (MAP_4027 18-32 ) and EBV (BOLF1 305-320 ) peptides were tested by indirect ELISA in sera from 100 RA patients, 54 patients with other CTDs (14 SLE, 28 SSc and 12 SSj) and 100 healthy subjects (HCs). Antibody responses to the same wt peptides have been tested in AIA mouse sera after immunization with complete Freud’s adjuvant (CFA) and methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA) to induce arthritis in the knee joint. Results BOLF1, MAP_4027 and IRF5 peptides triggered different antibody responses in CTD diseases with a stronger reactivity in RA ( p =0.0001). Similar trends were observed in AIA mice with significantly higher reactivity after 7 days from induction of arthritis. We also found statistically significant differences in antibody responses between SSc and HCs for BOLF1 ( p =0.003), MAP_4027 ( p =0.0076) and IRF5 ( p =0.0042). Peripheral reactivity to cit peptides was lower compared to their wt counterparts, except for cit-MAP_4027 18-32 , which induced stronger responses in RA than wt-MAP_4027 18-32 (46% vs. 26%, p =0.0170). Conclusion(s) : Our results show differential antibody responses to BOLF1, MAP_4027 and IRF5 peptides among CTDs, highlighting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers in these diseases. Experiments performed in IRF5 conditional knockout mice support the hypothesis of cross-reactivity between the investigated homologous antigens.

Interferon regulating factor 5 (IRF5) is a multifunctional regulator of immune responses, and has a key pathogenic function in gut inflammation, but how IRF5 is modulated is still unclear. Having performed a kinase inhibitor library screening in macrophages, here we identify protein-tyrosine kinase 2-beta (PTK2B/PYK2) as a putative IRF5 kinase. PYK2-deficient macrophages display impaired endogenous IRF5 activation, leading to reduction of inflammatory gene expression. Meanwhile, a PYK2 inhibitor, defactinib, has a similar effect on IRF5 activation in vitro, and induces a transcriptomic signature in macrophages similar to that caused by IRF5 deficiency. Finally, defactinib reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines in human colon biopsies from patients with ulcerative colitis, as well as in a mouse colitis model. Our results thus implicate a function of PYK2 in regulating the inflammatory response in the gut via the IRF5 innate sensing pathway, thereby opening opportunities for related therapeutic interventions for inflammatory bowel diseases and other inflammatory conditions.

COVID-19 has generated a rapidly evolving field of research, with the global scientific community striving for solutions to the current pandemic. Characterising humoral responses towards SARS-CoV-2, as well as closely related strains, will help determine whether antibodies are central to infection control, and aid the design of therapeutics and vaccine candidates. This review outlines the major aspects of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody research to date, with a focus on the various prophylactic and therapeutic uses of antibodies to alleviate disease in addition to the potential of cross-reactive therapies and the implications of long-term immunity.

COVID-19 was initially characterised as a disease primarily of the lungs, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the SARS-CoV2 virus is able to infect many organs and cause a broad pathological response. The primary infection site is likely to be a mucosal surface, mainly the lungs or the intestine, where epithelial cells can be infected with virus. Whilst it is clear that virus within the lungs can cause severe pathology, driven by an exaggerated immune response, infection within the intestine generally seems to cause minor or no symptoms. In this review we compare the disease processes between the lungs and gastrointestinal tract, and what might drive these different responses. As the microbiome is a key part of mucosal barrier sites, we also consider the effect that microbial species may play on infection and the subsequent immune responses. Due to difficulties obtaining tissue samples there are currently few studies focused on the local mucosal response rather than the systemic response, but understanding the local immune response will become increasingly important for understanding the mechanisms of disease in order to develop better treatments.

Destabilisation of balanced immune cell numbers and frequencies is a common feature of viral infections. This occurs due to, and further enhances, viral immune evasion and survival. Since the discovery of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which manifests in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a great number of studies have described the association between this virus and pathologically increased or decreased immune cell counts. In this review, we consider the absolute and relative changes to innate and adaptive immune cell numbers, in COVID-19. In severe disease particularly, neutrophils are increased, which can lead to inflammation and tissue damage. Dysregulation of other granulocytes, basophils, and eosinophils represent an unusual COVID-19 phenomenon. Contrastingly, the impact on the different types of monocytes leans more strongly to an altered phenotype, e.g. HLA-DR expression, rather than numerical changes. However, it is the adaptive immune response which bears the most profound impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection. T cell lymphopenia correlates with increased risk of ICU admission and death; therefore, this parameter is particularly important for clinical decision making. Mild and severe disease differ in the rate of immune cell counts returning to normal levels post disease. Tracking the recovery trajectories of various immune cell counts may also have implications for long-term COVID-19 monitoring. This review represents a snapshot of our current knowledge, showing that much has been achieved in a short period of time. Alterations in counts of distinct immune cells represent an accessible metric to inform patient care decision or predict disease outcomes.