Kedudukan hukum terhadap penggunaan suatu pasal, berkaitan erat dengan eksistensi tentang dapat tidaknya suatu pasal tersebut bisa diterapkan. Tidak terkecuali terhadap kejahatan terhadap perkawinan berupa tindak pidana perzinahan yang seringkali menjadi persoalan. Adanya kekhasan pengertian tentang perzinahan menurut hukum dengan kompleksitas syarat-syarat pengaduan perzinahan yang relatif panjang membuat penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana perzinahan tidak cepat berjalan. Persoalan lain kemudian muncul ketika voltoid delict dalam pasal tindak pidana perzinahan belum sampai selesai dan dimasukkan dalam kategori percobaan. Batasan formulasi yang belum tegas tentang percobaan perzinahan, serta perbedaan penafsiran tentang permulaan pelaksanaan dan perbuatan persiapan membuat penggunaan pasal percobaan perzinahan seringkali menjadi bahan perdebatan. Artikel ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konseptual, yang bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis tentang Kedudukan Hukum Penggunaan Pasal Percobaan Perzinahan Dalam Praktik Peradilan.
An important instrument in law enforcement against corruption is the existence of an additional crime in the form of paying as much substitute money as same with corrupt money. However, it is still a problem with the law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption committed before the Law No.31/1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime was implemented. The Law No. 31/1999 which provided a clear solution to the steps of how if the penalty for substitute money was not paid was not contained in the RI Law No.3 of 1971. The opinion that if a corruption case excludes a judge made law, then it becomes possible if corruption cases in the past can still be prosecuted and tried in the present by using RI Law No.3 of 1971. This article use normative juridical research with a statute approach, comparative approach and conceptual approach, which aims to critically examine the executorial power of criminal substitute money in the Law No.3 of 1971 concerning the Eradication of Corruption CrimesKeywords: Corruption, Substitute Criminal Money, Strength Executorial. ABSTRAKInstrumen penting dalam law enforcement terhadap tindak pidana korupsi yaitu pidana tambahan berupa pembayaran sejumlah uang pengganti maksimal sama dengan uang yang telah dikorupsi. Namun masih menjadi persoalan terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan sebelum Undang undang No.31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi diberlakukan. Ketentuan Undang undang No.31 Tahun 1999 memberikan jalan keluar secara tegas tentang upaya apabila hukuman uang pengganti tersebut tidak dibayar yang tidak diatur dalam Undang undang No.3 Tahun 1971. Adanya pendapat jika perkara korupsi mengenyampingkan masa daluwarsa (judge made law), sehingga memungkinkan jika perkara korupsi pada masa lalu masih dapat dituntut dan diadili pada masa sekarang dengan menggunakan Undang undang No.3 Tahun 1971. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konseptual yang bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis kekuatan eksekutorial pidana uang pengganti dalam Undang undang No.3 Tahun 1971 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.Kata Kunci: Korupsi, Pidana Uang Pengganti, Kekuatan Eksekutorial.
The Center of Integrated Law Enforcement which is known as the “Sentra Gakkumdu” is a concrete manifestation of escort and supervision of the implementation of the General Election. The handling of alleged election crime violations has different work procedures, procedural law, and time limits, so that a one-stop handling pattern is established through Sentra Gakkumdu, which consists of elements of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu), the Indonesian National Police and the Indonesian Attorney’s Office. Based on the different handling patterns in the Gakkumdu Center, it should be included in a stronger legal basis through special legislation regarding the Election Criminal Justice System, which regulates formal law and material law, and regulates the expansion of the Integrated Criminal Justice System consists of components of Sentra Gakkumdu, components of the Judiciary Institution, and components of the Penal Institution. This aims to accelerate the interconnection between individuals and institutions in the handling of alleged election crime violations in a more comprehensive manner. This article is prepared using normative juridical research methods through the Statute Approach, Comparative Approach,and Conceptual Approach, which aims to critically examine the work patterns of the Sentra Gakkumdu as a way to the Concept of the Election Criminal Justice System.
The provision of necessities which were originally purely as a form of social solidarity to the poor or as souvenirs just to fulfill the appropriateness of eastern culture in visiting, when proven effective in gaining votes, became a new mode by candidates in approaching constituents, which such practice is commonly called with the practice of money politics. This research aims to find out and analyze the rationale for the reconstruction of money politics in the general election. The method used in this study is a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the rationale for the reconstruction of money politics in the general election is that giving something in the form of money or goods at the time of the election becomes a close causal relationship between the occurrence of corruption, both pre-gift and post-giving.
Until now, there has been no specific regulation regarding the crime of political corruption in the laws and regulations in Indonesia, but this kind of activity has become familiarly mentioned. This phenomenon makes the legal position of the criminal act of political corruption worthy of being a separate offense in a material criminal law regulation. The purpose of writing this article is to determine the legal position which can later be used as material to formulate a new criminal act in the form of political corruption in the applicable positive law. This article uses the normative juridical research method through statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach, which aims to critically examine the legal position of the criminal act of political corruption as part of the reflection of money politics practices. The study results indicate that in the context of future legal reforms, money politics as a form of political corruption must be regulated as a special offense in the law on eradicating corruption. The novelty offered by the authors in this article is the idea of the need to criminalize political corruption as a separate crime in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.