A total of 40 S. aureus and 68 coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CNS) isolates from bovine subclinical mastitis were investigated for their ability to form biofilm as one of the most important virulence factors.Using Congo Red Agar (CRA) method, 32.5%, 35%, and 32.5% of S. aureus strains were strong, intermediate, and negative biofilm producers, while in CNS the percentages were 29.5%, 42.6%, and 27.9%, respectively. By microtiter plate (MTP) method, 52.5%, 27.5%, and 20% of S. aureus isolates were strong, moderate, and weak biofilm producers, while in CNS the percentages were 44%, 30.9%, and 19.2%, respectively. Indian ink staining was used to detect the EPS layer of biofilm producers. All isolates were screened for presence of biofilm related genes, eno, icaA, icaD, and bap. In S. aureus isolates, the positive rates of eno, icaA, icaD, and bap genes were 75%, 15%, 62.5%, and 2.5% while in CNS were 92.6%, 5.9%, 47.1%, and 4.4%, respectively. The eno gene had the highest rate while the bap gene had the lowest rate. Presence of icaA and icaD genes was not always correlated with biofilm production. This study demonstrated high prevalence of Staphylococcus biofilm producers among bovine mastitis in Egypt. Therefore, attention must be paid toward implementation of new ways for effective treatment of such infections.
A total of 233 mastitic milk samples (151 cows and 82 ewes) and 90 mammary gland tissue samples (56 cows and 34 ewes) were collected from different Egyptian Governorates for P. multocida investigation as one of mastitis causing pathogens and its effect on the mammary gland tissues. The isolated P. multocida from clinical mastitic milk was slightly higher than that from subclinical form in both cows and ewes (15.3% versus 13.1% and 27.3% versus 26.7%, respectively) and it was isolated from the udder tissues of both cows and ewes with percentages of (17.85%) and (23.52%), respectively. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used as confirmatory, rapid and reliable test for detection of P. multocida antibodies in the tested milk samples and they were detected in mastitic cow's and ewe's milk whey in (17.2%) and (34.2%), respectively. The antibiogram profile of P. multocida was studied for detection of its susceptibility to 15 different antibiotics to detect the drug of choice for its treatment. P. multocida isolated from cow's milk showed more resistance to various antibiotics than that isolated from ewe's milk. The DNA integrity of mammary gland tissue cells was detected using comet assay and the percentage of DNA damage was significantly elevated in case of P. multocida infected mammary gland (P<0.05). In addition, the histopathological findings of P. multocida infected udder showed focal and/or diffuse chronic lymphocytic mastitis with an extensive degeneration and necrosis of the alveolar epithelium as well as interstitial tissue. Most of the mammary alveoli were filled with basophilic bacterial colonies with bipolar bodies positively stained by methylene blue and Giemsa stains. Cytological evaluation was conducted on all udder tissue samples and 16/18 positive cases (88.8%) were correlated with their histopathological examination. Histochemically, tissue sections from infected udder showed weak or no alkaline phosphatase activity and density of protein staining. It was concluded that P. multocida should be considered as an important sharing etiological agent of mastitis in both cows and ewes (especially in ewes) and associated with significant histopathological alterations in the glandular tissue structure. ELISA was considered as a quick and reliable technique for detection of P. multocida infection in the mammary gland especially in the un-vaccinated farms beside the traditional cultural method. The cytological interpretation was quiet helpful in rapid screening of the mammary gland affections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.