Early pregnancy dyslipidemia, particularly hypertriglyceridemia appears associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia.

In our cohort, we found that endometrioid/endometrioid type synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancer had different clinical histopathologic characteristics and favorable prognosis compared to the other histologic types of these cancers. Histopathologic type of the ovarian cancer component, stage of endometrial cancer and level of cancer antigen 125 at diagnosis were observed to have a great influence on the development of recurrence and survival of synchronous primary carcinomas of the endometrium and ovary.

Background: In subtypes of non-endometrioid endometrium cancers (non-ECC), it is not clear whether the omentectomy is a part of debulking if visual assessment is normal. Recently, the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group in their report titled “Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up” recommended that omentectomy be performed in the serous subtype, but not in carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma or clear cell. In this study, the question is whether omentectomy should be a part of a staging procedure in patients with non-ECC. Besides, the sensitivity and specificity of the visual assessment of omentum were analyzed. Methods: Patients diagnosed with non-ECC in 2 gynecological oncology clinics between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Occult (absence of visible lesions) and gross (presence of visible lesions) omental metastasis rates of histological subtypes were analyzed. Results: We identified 218 patients with non-ECC. Thirty-four of them (15.1%) had omental metastases and 44.1% of these metastases (n = 15) were occult metastases. The sensitivity of the surgeon's visual assessment of an omentum (positive or negative) was 0.55. The highest rate of omental metastasis was found in carcinosarcoma followed by serous, mixed subtypes, and clear-cell (20.4, 17.3, 16.6, 10.0%, respectively). Adnexal metastasis was the only factor associated with occult omental metastasis (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Omental metastases occur too often to omit omentectomy during surgical procedures for non-ECC regardless of histological subtypes, and visual assessment is insufficient in recognizing the often occult metastases. Omentectomy should be a part of the staging surgery in patients with non-ECC.

Undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UCE/DCEs) of the endometrium are rare tumors with poor prognosis. There are few clinicopathologic studies with detailed immunohistochemical analysis regarding UCE/DCEs.We evaluated the diagnostic value of a selected tumor stem-cell marker and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers, in addition to previously studied markers in identifying UCE/DCEs from other types of high-grade endometrial carcinomas.Eleven cases of UCE/DCEs with complete clinical follow-up that were diagnosed between 2006 and 2015 were included in the study. For immunohistochemical comparison, 11 clinically matched cases for each type of other high-grade endometrial carcinomas (high-grade endometrioid (F3-EC), serous [SC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) were used as a control group. An immunohistochemical analysis including fascin, SALL4, E-cadherin, and β-catenin, in addition to epithelial and neuroendocrine markers was performed in each case.The majority of UCE/DCEs displayed diffuse expression of fascin (81.9%) and loss of E-cadherin expression (54.5%). SALL4 expression was detected in 36.3% of the UCE/DCE cases. SALL4 expression was significantly more frequent in UCE/DCEs than all other high-grade carcinomas (P < 0.001). Loss of E-cadherin and fascin expression was significantly more frequent in UCE/DCEs than high-grade endometrioid and clear cell adenocarcinomas (P = 0.012, 0.014 and P = 0.01, 0.003, respectively).We suggest that loss of E-cadherin expression together with fascin and SALL4 immunopositivity in addition to morphologic features have an impact in differential diagnosis of UCE/DCEs from other high-grade endometrial carcinomas.

Aim Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female reproductive tract in the developed countries. There are many risk factors defined for the development of endometrial cancer, including obesity. We aimed to evaluate the significance of adiposity on the survival outcomes of the patients with endometrial cancer. Methods The patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and underwent surgery between April 2009 and October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes were measured at the level of umbilicus on single‐slice magnetic resonance imaging. Visceral adiposity index was calculated. Patients were compared regarding their clinical, demographical, pathologic and survival characteristics. Patients divided into low visceral adiposity (≤0.265, group 1) and high visceral adiposity (>0.265, group 2). Results A total of 186 patients were included in this retrospective study. There was no significant difference in terms of the demographical, clinical and tumor characteristics of the patients, except age, menopausal status, subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue. Although no significant difference in progression‐free survival and disease‐specific survival was noted between groups (P = 0.181), more patients in group 2 died because of endometrial cancer as statistically significant (P = 0.024). Disease‐specific survival showed a significant difference between groups according to the log‐rank test. Conclusion Visceral adiposity tissue is a significant and reliable prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer prognosis. Women diagnosed with endometrial cancer should be informed about the deleterious effects of visceral adiposity on disease‐specific survival.