No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Cervical root fracture is a major clinical problem in flared root canals treated with different post and core applications. This in vitro study evaluated the stress transfer of different post and core systems to the cervical part of the artificially created flared root canals, by using strain gauges. The post-core systems investigated were: (a) cast post-core system without resin reinforcement, (b) cast post-core system with resin reinforcement, (c) pre-fabricated post and resin core with resin reinforcement. The post-core systems which were cemented on simulated roots were subjected to a load applied at an angle of 45 degrees to the long axis of the simulated roots. The strain gauges which were cemented to the cervical part of simulated roots were connected to the data acquisition module to measure and record the changes in strain data. Specimens restored with resin reinforcement either with cast post-core or pre-fabricated post and resin core transferred the stress to the cervical part of the artificial roots at a rate lower than conventional cast post-core system (P = 0.001; anova and Tukey's post hoc test). It was concluded that the resin reinforcement of root canals before post-core applications reduces the stresses at the cervical part of the root surfaces.

No abstract

Four cushion adhesives (Fittydent I; Fittydent II, introduced as an advanced formula; Protefix; and Seabond) were compared clinically through patients subjective evaluations. Maxillary dentures of 32 patients were relined and the mandibular dentures were scored by Kapur index before the application of different treatments. The cushion adhesives were used only with the existing mandibular prosthesis. The four treatments were applied to the patients in groups of 8 by allocating each group randomly to one of the four sequences of treatments determined by latin square design. Each patient took each treatment only once. The adhesives were applied by the authors as recommended by the manufacturers. Patients used each material for 24 h and, through a questionnaire, they evaluated the seven following aspects of each different cushion material: retention, duration of retention, effects on ability to chew, effects on other oral functions, cleansing of dentures, cleansing of gums, and an overall evaluation of materials. Both Fittydent products significantly improved denture retention and the ability to chew. The patients who expressed 'much better' chewing with Fittydent products, had mandibular dentures rated poor or fair.

No abstract

No abstract