With the promise of T cell-based therapy for cancer finally becoming reality, this Review focuses on the less-studied γδ T cell lineage and its diverse responses to tumours. γδ T cells have well-established protective roles in cancer, largely on the basis of their potent cytotoxicity and interferon-γ production. Besides this, recent studies have revealed a series of tumour-promoting functions that are linked to interleukin-17-producing γδ T cells. Here, we integrate the current knowledge from both human and mouse studies to highlight the potential of γδ T cell modulation to improve cancer immunotherapy.
Although natural killer (NK) cells are well known for their ability to kill tumors, few studies have addressed the interactions between resting (nonactivated) NK cells and freshly isolated human tumors. Here, we show that human leukocyte antigen class I low tumor cells isolated directly from patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma trigger degranulation by resting allogeneic NK cells. This was paralleled by induction of granzyme B and caspase-6 activities in the tumor cells and significant tumor cell lysis. Ovarian carcinoma cells displayed ubiquitous expression of the DNAX accessory molecule-1 (DNAM-1) ligand PVR and sparse/heterogeneous expression of the NKG2D ligands MICA/MICB and ULBP1, ULBP2, and ULBP3. In line with the NK receptor ligand expression profiles, antibody-mediated blockade of activating receptor pathways revealed a dominant role for DNAM-1 and a complementary contribution of NKG2D signaling in tumor cell recognition. These results show that resting NK cells are capable of directly recognizing freshly isolated human tumor cells and identify ovarian carcinoma as a potential target for adoptive NK cell-based immunotherapy. [Cancer Res 2007;67(3):1317-25]
immunotherapy ͉ in vivo imaging ͉ tumor biology ͉ tolerance ͉ retroviral transduction
BackgroundAdjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin) treatment of breast cancer patients significantly improves their clinical outcome. Vaccination is an attractive alternative approach to provide HER-2/neu (Her2)-specific antibodies and may in addition concomitantly stimulate Her2-reactive T-cells. Here we report the first administration of a Her2-plasmid DNA (pDNA) vaccine in humans.Patients and MethodsThe vaccine, encoding a full-length signaling-deficient version of the oncogene Her2, was administered together with low doses of GM-CSF and IL-2 to patients with metastatic Her2-expressing breast carcinoma who were also treated with trastuzumab. Six of eight enrolled patients completed all three vaccine cycles. In the remaining two patients treatment was discontinued after one vaccine cycle due to rapid tumor progression or disease-related complications. The primary objective was the evaluation of safety and tolerability of the vaccine regimen. As a secondary objective, treatment-induced Her2-specific immunity was monitored by measuring antibody production as well as T-cell proliferation and cytokine production in response to Her2-derived antigens.ResultsNo clinical manifestations of acute toxicity, autoimmunity or cardiotoxicity were observed after administration of Her2-pDNA in combination with GM-CSF, IL-2 and trastuzumab. No specific T-cell proliferation following in vitro stimulation of freshly isolated PBMC with recombinant human Her2 protein was induced by the vaccination. Immediately after all three cycles of vaccination no or even decreased CD4+ T-cell responses towards Her2-derived peptide epitopes were observed, but a significant increase of MHC class II restricted T-cell responses to Her2 was detected at long term follow-up. Since concurrent trastuzumab therapy was permitted, λ-subclass specific ELISAs were performed to specifically measure endogenous antibody production without interference by trastuzumab. Her2-pDNA vaccination induced and boosted Her2-specific antibodies that could be detected for several years after the last vaccine administration in a subgroup of patients.ConclusionThis pilot clinical trial demonstrates that Her2-pDNA vaccination in conjunction with GM-CSF and IL-2 administration is safe, well tolerated and can induce long-lasting cellular and humoral immune responses against Her2 in patients with advanced breast cancer.Trial registrationThe trial registration number at the Swedish Medical Products Agency for this trial is Dnr151:785/2001.
Cancer patients die primarily due to disease recurrence after transient treatment responses. The emergence of therapy-resistant escape variants is fuelled by intra-tumour heterogeneity, underpinned by interference and Darwinian evolution among continuously developing sub-clones in the mutating tumour. Novel cancer cell variants build upon the pre-existing genetic landscape and tumour heterogeneity is often ascribed largely to genetic variability. While mutations are required for cancer development and studies of genetic evolution of tumours have improved our understanding of cancer biology, genetics only represents one dimension of the fitness of each cancer cell. Beyond the mutations, several non-genetic factors also add significant variability, resulting in a complex and highly dynamic tumour cell population that can drive disease under almost any condition. This viewpoint article summarizes the genetic basis of intra-tumour heterogeneity, before dissecting four major interdependent non-genetic factors we think critically contribute to the overall variability of tumour cells in all types of cancer: epigenetic regulation, cellular differentiation hierarchies, gene expression stochasticity and tumour microenvironment. We finally present the relevant technological approaches to address the combined contribution of both genetic and non-genetic factors to intra-tumour heterogeneity, focusing on genomic profiling, cellular lineage tracing and single-cell RNA sequencing technologies. This strategy will ultimately allow dissection of the full range and depth of intra-tumour heterogeneity. We thus believe that understanding how cancer genetics synergize with the emerging non-genetic factors will be key for development of therapies able to tackle tumour escape and thereby improve cancer patient survival. Cancer clonal evolution and its clinical implicationsThe existence of intra-tumour heterogeneity was first described in the 1800s by the pathologist Rudolf Virchow [1]. Identification of heterogeneity in cancer cell morphology and histology within tumours was followed by observations of variation in cell surface markers [2][3][4][5], genetic abnormalities [6,7], growth rates [2,8,9] and response to therapies [2,10]. The formulation of the chromosomal theory in the 1950s [11], supported by the observation of increasing chromosomal changes during tumour progression, provided the genetic basis for the observed tumour cell heterogeneity and was key for the formulation of Peter Nowell's theory in his seminal 1976 paper, 'Clonal evolution of tumor cell populations' [12].
Recent advancements in T cell immunotherapy suggest that T cells engineered with high affinity T cell receptors (TCR) can offer better tumor regression. However, whether a high affinity TCR alone is sufficient to control tumor growth, or the T cell subset bearing the TCR is also important remains unclear. Using the human tyrosinase epitope reactive, CD8 independent, high affinity TCR isolated from MHC class-I restricted CD4+ T cells obtained from tumor infiltrating lymphocytes of a metastatic melanoma patient, we developed a novel TCR transgenic mouse with a C57BL/6 background. This HLA-A2 restricted TCR was positively selected on both CD4+ and CD8+ single-positive (SP) cells. However, when the TCR transgenic mouse was developed with an HLA-A2 background, the transgenic TCR was primarily expressed by CD3+CD4-CD8- double-negative (DN) T cells. TIL 1383I TCR transgenic CD4+, CD8+ and CD4-CD8- T cells were functional and retained the ability to control tumor growth without the need for vaccination or cytokine support in vivo. Furthermore, the HLA-A2+/human tyrosinase TCR double transgenic mice developed spontaneous hair depigmentation and had visual defects that progressed with age. Our data show that the expression of the high affinity TIL 1383I TCR alone in CD3+ T cells is sufficient to control the growth of murine and human melanoma and the presence or absence of CD4 and CD8 co-receptors had little effect on its functional capacity.
Defective expression of HLA class I molecules is common in tumor cells and may allow escape from CTL-mediated immunity. We here investigate alterations in expression of HLA class I and their underlying molecular mechanisms in ovarian cancer patients. The HLA class I and HLA-A2 expression levels on noncultured tumor cells of 12 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma were investigated by flow cytometry. Molecular analyses of antigen-processing machinery (APM) components were done in metastatic cancer cells, and the HLA genotype was determined in both these and the primary tumor. HER-2/neu-specific immunity was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunospot assays. The metastatic tumor cells from all patients expressed low levels of HLA class I surface antigens. In six of nine HLA-A2+ patients, HLA-A2 expression was heterogeneous with a subpopulation of tumor cells exhibiting decreased or absent HLA-A2 expression. One patient-derived tumor cell line completely lacked HLA-A2 but exhibited constitutive expression of APM components and high HLA class I expression that was further inducible by IFN-gamma treatment. Genotyping showed a haplotype loss in the metastatic tumor cells, whereas tumor tissue microdissected from the primary tumor exhibited an intact HLA gene complex. Interestingly, HLA-A2-restricted HER-2/neu-specific T-cell responses were evident among the lymphocytes of this patient. Abnormalities in HLA class I antigen expression are common features during the progression of ovarian cancer, and haplotype loss was, for the first time, described as an underlying mechanism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.