The shear-induced coil-helix transition of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) has been studied with time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy at various temperatures. The effects of temperature, shear rate, and strain on the coil-helix transition were studied systematically. The induced conformational order increases with the shear rate and strain. A threshold of shear strain is required to induce conformational ordering. High temperature reduces the effect of shear on the conformational order, though a simple correlation was not found. Following the shear-induced conformational ordering, relaxation of helices occurs, which follows the first-order exponential decay at temperatures well above the normal melting point of iPP. The relaxation time versus temperature is fitted with an Arrhenius law, which generates an activation energy of 135 kJ/mol for the helix-coil transition of iPP. At temperatures around the normal melting point, two exponential decays are needed to fit well on the relaxation kinetic of helices. This suggests that two different states of helices are induced by shear: (i) isolated single helices far away from each other without interactions, which have a fast relaxation kinetic; (ii) aggregations of helices or helical bundles with strong interactions among each other, which have a much slower relaxation process. The helical bundles are assumed to be the precursors of nuclei for crystallization. The different helix concentrations and distributions are the origin of the three different processes of crystallization after shear. The correlation between the shear-induced conformational order and crystallization is discussed.
Large arrays of high aspect ratio, artificial hydrogel based cilia that can respond to multiple stimuli are produced by means of micro‐fabrication techniques. The cilia operate in aqueous solutions and are sensitive to pH, electric and/or magnetic fields. The biomimetic system combines both sensing and motility. Detection of changes in environment, such as a decrease in pH, triggers a collective response, to an external time‐dependent magnetic field.
Swollen physical magnetorheological (MR) gels were obtained by self-assembling of triblock copolymers containing dispersed soft magnetic particles. The transient rheological responses of these systems were investigated experimentally. Upon sudden application of a homogeneous magnetic field step change, the storage modulus of MR gels continued to increase with time. Such increase trend of the storage modulus could be expressed by a double-exponential function with two distinct modes, a fast and a slow one. The result was compared with the transient rheological response of equivalent MR fluids (paraffin oil without copolymer) and a MR elastomer (PDMS) and interpreted as the consequence of strong rearrangement of the original particle network under magnetic field. Similar to the structure evolution of MR fluids, the ensemble of results suggests that "chaining" and "clustering" processes are also happening inside the gel and are responsible for the rheological behavior, provided they are happening on a smaller length scale (long chains and clusters are hindered). We show that response times of several minutes are typical for the slow response of MR gels. The characteristic time t(2) for the slow process is significantly dependent on the magnetic flux density, the matrix viscoelastic property, particle volume fraction, and sample's initial particle distribution. In order to validate our results, the role of dynamic strain history was clarified. We show that, in the linear viscoelastic region, the particle rearrangement of MR gels was not hindered or accelerated by the dynamic strain history.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.