Gingival melanin hyperpigmentation is an esthetic concern for many individuals. In this study, we compared the standard surgical removal method with two different Er,Cr:YSGG laser settings in order to find the best treatment method. In 33 dental arches, the following three treatment groups were comparatively evaluated: (1) surgical stripping, (2) removal with laser setting 1 (4.5 W, 50 Hz, 100% water, 80% air, 60 μs, 800 μm Tip; MZ8), and (3) laser setting 2 (2.5 W, 50 Hz, 20% water, 40% air, 700 μs, 800 μm Tip; MZ8). We comparatively evaluated pain, patient satisfaction and wound healing, treatment time, and the amount of bleeding. Re-pigmentation was evaluated after 1 and 12 months by Hedin and Dummet pigmentation scores. Laser setting 1 had the best results regarding pain and patient satisfaction, although not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Wound healing results were better using lasers compared to surgical stripping (P < 0.05). Laser setting 1 was a faster procedure with mild amounts of bleeding. The least amount of bleeding was seen with laser setting 2. After 1 month, only two cases of the laser setting 2-treated areas showed an isolated pigmented area in the papilla; at 12 months, the mean Hedin indexes were still less than 2 and mean Dummett index less than 1 in all treatment techniques, with the lowest scores seen in the laser setting 1 sites. Based on our results, Er,Cr:YSGG laser can be more convenient for gingival depigmentation compared to surgical blade. Although not statistically significant, laser setting 1 with shorter pulse duration and higher water spray showed better overall results. However, laser setting 2, with longer pulse duration and less water spray, resulted in better coagulative effects and can be used to control bleeding wherever necessary in clinical practice.
Background A number of patients with facial fractures have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak that may result in meningitis and other central nervous system complications. Commonly, CSF leak occurs following trauma, but the etiology and pattern of this disorder are different from region to region. This study aims to evaluate the distribution of CSF leak in patients with maxillofacial fractures in Isfahan province, Iran. Patients and Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 1,287 medical files of patients admitted to a medical center with head and face injuries were evaluated during a 7-year period (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). Data was obtained using descriptive analysis. Results Of the 1,278 patients with head and maxillofacial fractures, 16 (1.25 %) males and one (0.07 %) female had CSF leak; all these cases had skull base fracture. Of these, 52.9 % had maxillary fracture, 23.5 % nasal fracture, 41.1 % orbital fracture, 11.7 % mandibular fracture, 23.5 % frontal fracture, and 41.1 % had more than one site of fracture. 58.8 % had rhinorrhea and 41.2 % otorrhea. Of all these patients with CSF leak, 8 (47 %), 2 (11.8 %), and 7 (41.2 %) cases were treated spontaneously, using lumbar drain placement, and by surgical intervention, respectively. Conclusions Cerebrospinal fluid leak was observed most frequently in patients with fracture in the zygomatic and maxillary bone, and mostly exhibited itself as rhinorrhea and/or otorrhea. All cases with CSF leak had skull base fracture as well. However, post-traumatic CSF leaks are uncommon and are generally treated without surgical intervention (59 %). Distribution of CSF leak varies from one region to another and knowing this fact helps to manage the injury and prevent the complications.
Background: Periodontal diseases and their important contribution to our overall health has been a field of study in the recent years. This study aimed at investigating the knowledge of general practitioners about the relationship between periodontal diseases and systemic diseases.
Background and Objective: Extraction of impacted lower third molars is one of the most frequent surgeries of the oral cavity. This operation might be accompanied by inevitable complications, such as pain, swelling, and trismus after surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of low-intensity/power laser therapy on swelling and trismus after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed on 40 patients who required similar unilateral impacted third molars. These patients were randomly divided into two groups of 20, including the control group with no laser application and the test group receiving laser irradiation. In the intervention group, 1 cm 2 of the tissue was irradiated immediately post-operation by 12 j/cm 2 energy using a 980-nm laser setting with continuous wave mode at the output power of 200 MW for 60 s. Radiations were carried out at three regions, including two intraoral sites on the buccal and lingual sides of the operated area and an extraoral area on the joining point of the masseter muscle to the mandible. Inflammation and trismus were assessed by measuring the size of the face and maximum mouth opening on the second and seventh days after surgery. Results: Our findings demonstrated that in the laser group, on the second day post-operation the maximum mouth opening (trismus) was 28±6 and facial swelling was 217.8±12.8. The two groups were not significantly different on this day regarding the two evaluated variables (P>0.05). On the seventh day, trismus and facial swelling were reported as 39.85±6.97 and 209.2±13.45, respectively. Moreover, improvements were observed in the irradiated group at this time point. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the test and control group concerning these factors (P>0.05). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, laser application with the parameters set in this study had no significant positive effects on reducing the post-operation complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.