Because of societal challenges and an unsubstantiated assumption of low HPV prevalence, few studies have examined sociodemographic characteristics or sexual behaviors associated with HPV in Saudi women. However, a high prevalence of HPV infection was found, with smoking and multiple partners as significant risk factors, in this hospital-based cohort of predominantly Saudi women.
The detection of HPV viral DNA is regularly conducted with cervical screening. However, using a molecular marker such as the viral load may serve as a predictor associated with disease detection and progression. The present study aimed to screen for and genotype HPV among women in Saudi Arabia, develop and validate sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays to detect viral load for the two most common HPV types, namely 16 and 18, and assess whether HPV viral load could be used as a marker for cervical abnormality and disease progression. This study examined 733 specimens (both formalin-fixed paraffin embedded specimens and PAP smear samples) from women who underwent cervical screening. The specimens and samples were processed for DNA extraction and then tested for HPV DNA using nested PCR. Approximately 165 specimens (18%) were positive for HPV. Those specimens were genotyped using a reverse line blotting hybridization assay. The results indicated that the most common HPV types detected were a single infection with HPV 16 (51%) or with HPV 18 (28%) followed by infections with multiple HPV types (~7%). A qPCR TaqMan assay developed and validated in-house was used to determine viral load for HPV genotypes 16 (n ¼ 80) and 18 (n ¼ 45). Viral loads for both HPV types were significantly associated with cervical cytology grade (P < 0.05). The odds ratio (OR) for the HPV 16 viral load was high for specimens with cervical cancer (OR, 18.8; 95% CI, 4.3-82.9) or for those with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (OR, 14.7; 95% Cl,). For the HPV 18 viral load, the OR was significant only for specimens with cervical cancer (OR, 11.1; 95% Cl, 2.2-54.9). Logistic regression models for HPV 16 and for HPV 18 viral load levels were significant, with higher viral load associated with cervical abnormalities. These findings indicate that viral load is a predictor significantly associated with cytology abnormality in women who are positive for high-risk HPVs and suggest that integrating a viral load test into current clinical screening practices for HPV-positive women is warranted in Saudi Arabia.
BACKGROUND: Data on human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and survival rates among HPV-infected women are scarce in Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVE: Assess the prevalence of HPV genotypes in cervical biopsy specimens and its effect on survival over a 10-year timeframe. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Saudi referral hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cervical biopsy specimens were collected from women aged 23-95 years old who underwent HPV detection, HPV genotyping, p16 INK4a expression measurement using immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed to analyze overall survival rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival rate of HPV-positive cervical cancer patients. SAMPLE SIZE: 315 cervical biopsy specimens. RESULTS: HPV was detected in 96 patients (30.4%): 37.3% had cervical cancer; 14.2% cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, 4.1% CIN II, and 17.0% CIN I. A significant association was found between HPV presence and cervical cancer (χ 2 =56.78; P <.001). The expression of p16 INK4a was a significant predictor of survival: women who had p16 INK4a overexpression had poorer survival rates (multivariate Cox regression, hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1–8.8). In addition, multivariate models with HPV status and cervical cancer diagnosis showed that HPV status was a significant predictor of survival: HPV-positive women had better survival rates than HPV-negative women. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that implementing cervical and HPV screening programs may decrease cervical cancer rates and improve survival rates of women in Saudi Arabia. LIMITATION: Single center and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is typically critical in the oncogenesis of cervical cancer. However, available HPV detection kits differ in their ability and sensitivity to detect various types of HPV, and this variability has led to inconsistencies in the reporting of the geographic prevalence of HPV types, especially in developing countries. Here, we compared results of the recently developed GenoFlow HPV array test, which detects 33 HPV genotypes, to those of the well-established reverse line blot (RLB) assay, which detects 23 HPV types. Methodology: In total, 608 cervical specimens with cytology results ranging from normal to cancer were collected using an endocervical brush from women attending outpatient clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: Sixty-nine specimens (11%) were positive for HPV. HPV genotype detection using the GenoFlow test had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 100%. Overall agreement between the two HPV genotyping methods was 97%, with a concordance rate of 95%. Among the GenoFlow test results, 2% indicated additional HPV types that were not detected in the RLB assay, whereas the GenoFlow test missed 0.3% of the HPV types that were detected by the RLB; however, both tests were in agreement in detecting all major HPV types. Conclusion: The GenoFlow test was reliable, with results comparable to the RLB test. However, because the GenoFlow test is less labor-intensive and takes less total time (3 hours), it is a promising, affordable alternative to the RLB for HPV diagnosis and screening programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.