The effect of a liposomal preparation of beta-methasone dipropionate (0.039%, BDP) has been compared to that of a commercial propylene glycol-gel containing 0.064% BDP in a double-blind, randomized, paired trial lasting 14 d in 10 patients with atopic eczema and 10 patients with psoriasis vulgaris. In eczema, the liposome preparation tended to reduce erythema and scaling more than the conventional gel, the difference in the latter parameter being significant on Day 7. There was greater improvement of psoriasis on the side treated with the reference gel. Hence, liposome encapsulation of BDP may increase the antiinflammatory action but not the antiproliferative effect. Since inhibition of mitotic activity is linked to the atrophogenicity of topical corticosteroids, the results suggest that liposome encapsulation may improve the benefit-risk ratio in eczema.
During a four year period, a total of 84 cases of dermatophytosis were seen in patients from 0 to 17 years of age attending our out-patient department. The sex distribution was about equal in preadolescents. Males predominated among adolescents. A peak incidence at early school age was due to cases of tinea capitis, mainly caused by Microsporum canis. A peak among adolescents was due to cases of tinea pedis, mainly caused by Trichophyton rubrum. In general, patients with Trichophyton rubrum infections were older than those with other types of dermatophytosis (p less than 0.05). Dermatophytosis due to Microsporum canis was most frequently seen in January and in September (p less than 0.01). Although onychomycosis due to dermatophytes was a comparatively rare disease, it did occur within all age subgroups. Entities which were very frequent in former times and which have become rare during the last decades, such as tinea capitis due to Trichophyton schönleinii, still contribute to the spectrum of dermatophytosis in childhood.
Toenail tinea is a very recalcitrant dermatosis. Griseofulvin at 2500 mg/day is the current medication of choice, but it is minimally successful. In a controlled open trial ultramicrosize griseofulvin (UMSG) at doses of 660 and 990 mg/day was compared with itraconazole at 100 mg/day in 109 patients. At 4-week intervals, the patients were evaluated for their clinical and mycological statuses and adverse reactions. Treatment was given for up to 18 months. Compliance was checked by tablet counting. Response (cure, partial cure, marked improvement) was analyzed by the intent-to-treat method. Cured and partially cured patients were followed up. Except for one early dropout, the toenails (mean, 6 to 7) were involved. Cure or partial cure was found in 6% (UMSG at 660 mg), 14% (UMSG at 990 mg), and 19%o (itraconazole at 100 mg) of patients (P = 0.2097); marked improvement was found in 36, 44, and 39%o of patients in the three treatment groups, respectively.Most patients had to be treated for 18 months. Failure was related to short medication periods (adverse drug reactions, dropout). While stable cure was not obtained with UMSG at 660 mg, the higher dose of UMSG and itraconazole gave stable cures in the other patients. Side effects of nausea, diarrhea, and headache were found in 20, 26, and 11 patients, respectively (P = 0.0028), and the numbers in whom medication had to be discontinued differed, too (P = 0.0137). While there was no major difference with glutamic-pyruvic transaminase and -y-GT, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels declined slightly in the itraconazole group (P = 0.0357 and P = 0.0639, respectively, at 3 months). More than 70% of the patients had an average compliance of .90o%; four patients (two dropouts) were poor compliers. In conclusion, it appears questionable whether griseofulvin can continue to be considered the "gold standard" in the treatment of toenail tinea. At present, itraconazole at 100 mg shows better efficacy and is better tolerated.
Synopsis Two long-term trials were conducted each over eight weeks to compare the effect of the regular application of skin cleansing preparations of pH 5.5 and pH 8.5 and pH 5.5 and pH 7.0 respectively on the surface pH, roughness and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of normal human forehead and forearm skin. Both trials were based on a cross-over design: five healthy volunteers started with a pH 5.5 preparation and switched to the other after four weeks, five additional volunteers used the preparations in the opposite order. While the skin surface pH was markedly lower in those individuals using the pH 5.5 preparation at each examination, as compared to those using the pH 8.5 or pH 7.0 preparation, no such difference could be established with respect to skin roughness and TEWL. Hence the skin irritancy of a cleansing preparation does not seem to be linked to its pH within the pH ranges tested.
The addition of an anti-infective to a topical glucocorticoid preparation for superinfected atopic eczema is still controversial. To address this question in the context of the topical glucocorticoids of the non-halogenated double-ester type 0.25% prednicarbate cream was compared to the identical preparation incorporating the same amount of the disinfectant didecyldimethylammoniumchloride in patients suffering from atopic eczema carrying Staphylococcus aureus at a density of more than 10(6) colony-forming units per cm2. One of the preparations was used twice daily over 5 days according to a random plan in a blind fashion. Thereafter treatment was based on either prednicarbate cream or the corresponding vehicle according to clinical needs. Clinical and microbiological evaluation were scheduled for days 0, 6 and 34. Various clinical parameters were addressed individually as well as over all improvement using scores. A total of 143 patients was recruited. The patients of both groups improved rapidly with respect to clinical and microbiological findings. Essentially, there was no difference between the groups. Hence, the addition of an anti-infective to a topical prednicarbate preparation is not to be generally recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.