An international collaboration was set up to prospectively evaluate the role of allogeneic transplantation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and compare autologous transplantation with standard chemotherapy. Patients received 2 phases of induction and, if in remission, were assigned to allogeneic transplantation if they had a compatible sibling donor. Other patients were randomized to chemotherapy for 2.5 years versus an autologous transplantation. A donor versus no-donor analysis showed that Philadelphia chromosome-negative patients with a donor had a 5-year improved overall survival (OS), 53% versus 45% (P ‫؍‬ .01), and the relapse rate was significantly lower (P < .001). The survival difference was significant in standard-risk patients, but not in high-risk patients with a high nonrelapse mortality rate in the highrisk donor group. Patients randomized to chemotherapy had a higher 5-year OS (46%) than those randomized to autologous transplantation (37%; P ‫؍‬ .03). Matched related allogeneic transplantations for ALL in first complete remission provide the most potent antileukemic therapy and considerable survival benefit for standard-risk patients. However, the transplantation-related mortality for highrisk older patients was unacceptably high and abrogated the reduction in relapse risk. There is no evidence that a single autologous transplantation can replace consolidation/maintenance in any risk group. This study is registered at http:// clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00002514. (Blood.

A prospective phase II trial was conducted to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of a device designed for selective removal of rheumatoid factor from the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients. The device contained terpolymer hydrogel-coated plates with chemically attached, aggregated human immunoglobulin G, and it operated as an immunoaffinity column. Sixty-one patients aged 25 to 73 underwent weekly plasmapheresis treatments (the primary therapy phase). During the trial, patients continued current rheumatoid arthritis medications without dose adjustments. All patients received two to six treatments (primary therapy). Responding patients were eligible to continue apheresis treatment every 2 to 6 weeks (maintenance therapy). No serious, untoward side effects were noted in the course of this study; of 640 treatments, only 2 (in different patients) were aborted, one because of complaints of dizziness and angioedema and the other because of chest tightness and shortness of breath. Except for a significant (p less than 0.05) decrease in serum iron, no significant changes in complete blood count, serum electrolytes, renal and hepatic function tests, or serum C3 and C4 were noted. Although the trial was not designed to determine clinical efficacy, patients noted less morning stiffness, longer time to onset of fatigue, and improved global pain assessment (p less than 0.004); significant objective improvements were noted in joint pain, tenderness, swelling, and the number of affected joints (p less than 0.001). One-half of the treated patients had at least a 50 percent improvement in objective measures of antirheumatic activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We studied the transfusion response from random donor platelet concentrates in 15 stable multitransfused, thrombocytopenic patients by comparing the platelet counts measured before and 20 hours after transfusion. The observed platelet increments were corrected (corrected increment, C.I.) for the number of units of platelet concentrate transfused and the patient's body surface area in square meters (platelets/microliter per unit/m2). Using platelet concentrates stored for less than 24 hours, the patients achieved a median C.I. of 9500 (range: 5000-18,000). When platelet concentrates stored for 24 to 48 hours or 48 to 72 hours were given, the median C.I. markedly decreased to 1000 (range: 0-4800) and 0 (range: 0-5100), respectively (p less than 0.001). These differences could not be explained by further recipient alloimmunization. Transfusion with platelet concentrates less than 24 hours old on a second occasion, bracketing the transfusions of older platelet concentrates, resulted in a median C.I. of 7200 (range: 5400-14,500). Similar results were obtained in three patients when HLA-identical sibling platelet concentrates were employed. In vitro tests, including pH, morphology, and aggregation, demonstrated no statistically significant differences among the platelet concentrates stored for less than 24 hours, 24 to 48 hours, and 48 to 72 hours. These studies suggest that, although platelet concentrates can be stored for 72 hours without loss of in vitro function, the in vivo recovery is significantly diminished after 24 hours of storage, and preferably patients should not be transfused prophylactically with platelet concentrates greater than 24 hours old.

No abstract

Manual plasmapheresis is widely used to permit collection of fresh-frozen plasma with return of the red cells to the donor. However, this method is time-consuming and carries the inherent risk of returning the wrong cells to any individual donor. Automated plasmapheresis, using a specially designed discontinuous cell separator, permits the collection of 500 ml of plasma within 30 minutes without disconnecting the donor from the bag containing the donor's red cells. However, this plasma contains a small number of platelets which are not suitable for transfusion. We now report the modification of this machine to permit simultaneous collection of 3 units of platelet concentrate as well as 500 ml of plasma in less than 50 minutes. Reduction of the g force of the separator from 1200 to 650 g permits the simultaneous collection of plasma and a platelet concentrate with an average yield of 2.21 X 10(11) platelets. Platelet size distribution, in-vitro function. 51Cr survival, posttransfusion increment, and bleeding time correction are all normal. This modification has increased the flexibility of the separator and provides an instrument which can be used with a random volunteer blood donor population to generate both plasma and cells in less than 50 minutes and with increased cost-effectiveness over plasmapheresis alone.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract