This article examines the role of tension in the process of instructed second/foreign language acquisition, on the basis of findings from a comprehensive ethnography of the 7-week intensive beginners' class in the summer French School of Middlebury College. This project both completes and challenges the current research paradigm on "language anxiety," as it shifts the focus on the negative (anxiety) to a study of tension, defined as an unstable phenomenon that may be generated by any situation or event and may be perceived differently by each individual experiencing it. Our findings confirm that, regardless of its cause and manifestations, tension may engender euphoric or dysphoric effects (perceived as beneficial or detrimental), but also non-euphoric or non-dysphoric effects whose salience had previously not been established. These valuations appear linked not to the allegedly objective quality of instruction, materials, and learning environment, but to personal expectations and a priori beliefs about language learning. In addition, we found it necessary to separate operationally the effects of tension in the cognitive and the affective domains, and assess these effects qualitatively, rather than quantitatively, because students reacted most productively not to the degree of difficulty and expectation in the course, or to the reduction of affective dysphoria (or "anxiety") by a nonthreatening teaching style, but to the quality of materials and activities. Their overall perception of the learning experience was ultimately bound to the opportunity to reinvent themselves successfully in the target language. Achievement of linguistic or communicative proficiency mattered less than the satisfactory development of an emerging L2 self, which had to be fostered by a curriculum and instructional method providing the best possible balance of both cognitive and affective euphoric tension. In retrospect, dysphoria under its various guises was not found to play a particularly strong role, because it was dismissed and forgotten in a remarkable "amnesty effect" triggered by the students' realization of their eventual achievements in the program.IN THE PAST 20 YEARS, THE PURPORTED anxiety of learners has become a central concern of second/foreign language (L2/FL) acquisition research, which has focused almost exclusively on the negative effects of tension (or "stress") that induce anxiety. Although their existence is occasionally acknowledged, the potentially beneficial effects of tension have not been studied to the same extent, in part because most communicative teaching methodologies strive to reduce the perceived causes of language anxiety in order to create a more relaxed-and, it is believed, more productive-learning environment. Hence several questions immediately arise: Can we dissociate anxiety and tension? What exactly is the nature of tension in a L2 learning environment? Must research primarily seek correlation between tension (or lack thereof) and achievement of certain instructional objectives?Although it has brou...

No abstract

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Armand Colin. © Armand Colin. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

No abstract

Depuis les années 1950 s’est développé dans les pays anglophones un vaste champ de recherche et d’enseignement autour de la notion de « performance ». Bien que la masse imposante de travaux publiés depuis un demi-siècle, encore très partiellement diffusée hors de l’aire culturelle anglo-américaine, puisse induire à croire que le domaine est aujourd’hui parfaitement balisé, il lui manque encore un objet scientifique bien défini, la performance étant envisagée de manières extrêmement diverses par les théoriciens, qui s’accommodent des divergences au nom de la pluralité. Or, en termes pratiques, la performance ne trouve sa raison d’être qu’en complémentarité avec la spectation, lorsque l’une et l’autre se produisent en un lieu et à un moment donnés. C’est donc cette instance particulière, l’« événement-spectacle », qui apparaît désormais comme le légitime objet scientifique d’un champ de recherche qui dépasse les apories propres aux « études théâtrales » et aux Performance Studies .