Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common yet under-recognised chronic inflammatory disease of the nose and paranasal sinuses that is classified according to the presence (CRSwNP) or absence (CRSsNP) of nasal polyps.Methods: This paper reports the methodology and descriptive results of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GALEN) rhinosinusitis cohort. We established a large CRS cohort within the GALEN consortium (European FP6 research initiative) to identify inflammatory endotypes, the natural disease course, and its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Detailed information on the impact of CRS on HRQoL, comorbidity incidence, objective disease measures, and medical and surgical treatments were collected.Results: This multicentre cross-sectional case-control study recruited 935 adults (869 eligible for analysis: 237 CRSsNP; 445CRSwNP; 187 controls [reference group]). Comorbidities such as asthma, allergy, eczema, food allergy, urticaria, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly more frequent in CRS patients. Nasal corticosteroids, antibiotics, and oral corticosteroids were the most common treatments. Significantly more CRSwNP patients reported previous sinonasal surgery.
Conclusions:This study provides detailed information that facilitates studying CRS and its main phenotypes. However, patient distribution of this study does not necessarily reflect disease distribution in the general population.
Nasal nitric oxide, which is easily measured, provides a valuable non-invasive objective measure of the response of CRS to therapy. Topical nasal corticosteroids may be needed to reduce the contribution of nasal epithelial nitric oxide and allow that emanating from the sinuses to be measured.
The pathogenesis of aspirin intolerance remains unclear. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression is upregulated in nasal polyp epithelium, implying a role for nitric oxide (NO) in its formation. We decided to compare iNOS activity in polyp tissue from patients with and without aspirin intolerance. Nasal polyp tissue was collected from 15 patients undergoing routine nasal polypectomy. These patients were classified into three groups: Group A comprised patients with nasal polyps without asthma; Group B contained patients with nasal polyps and asthma; and Group C comprised patients with nasal polyps, asthma and aspirin sensitivity. All subjects in Group C had a history of aspirin-induced reaction and a confirmatory intranasal challenge with lysine-aspirin. NOS activity was measured by the ability of tissue homogenates to convert 3,4-L-arginine to L-citrulline in an L-N(G)-nitro-L-arginine-inhibitable fashion. The iNOS activity (picomoles) in polyp tissue from the 3 groups was: A, 248.72+/-220.79; B, 23.71+/-41.06; and C, 549.71+/-132.11. Thus, nasal polyps from patients with Samter's triad had a significantly higher iNOS activity (p = 0.004; one-way ANOVA). This finding does not correlate simply with disease severity or with the occurrence of asthma and could indicate another important facet of aspirin-induced airways disease.
In non-allergic subjects, histamine induced a reduction of minimal nasal cross-sectional area (Amin) and an increase in albumin release into nasal lavage. The effect of histamine on albumin release was inhibited by pretreatment with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1 jmol but not by D-NAME, 1 jpmol.L-NAME, 1 and 10 pmol, did not inhibit the histamine-induced reduction of Amin. In subjects allergic to grass pollen, antigen challenge induced a reduction in Amin that was not changed by pretreatment with L-NAME, and an increase in albumin release that was inhibited by L-NAME, 1 jimol. The data support a role for nitric oxide in mediating plasma extravasation in the nose induced by antigen challenge or histamine.
Introduction
Food hypersensitivity (FHS), including food allergy, coeliac disease and food intolerance, is a major public health issue. The Food Standards Agency (FSA), an independent UK Government department working to protect public health and consumers’ wider interests in food, sought to identify research priorities in the area of FHS.
Methods
A priority setting exercise was undertaken, using a methodology adapted from the James Lind Alliance—the first such exercise with respect to food hypersensitivity. A UK‐wide public consultation was held to identify unanswered research questions. After excluding diagnostics, desensitization treatment and other questions which were out of scope for FSA or where FSA was already commissioning research, 15 indicative questions were identified and prioritized by a range of stakeholders, representing food businesses, patient groups, health care and academia, local authorities and the FSA.
Results
295 responses were received during the public consultation, which were categorized into 70 sub‐questions and used to define 15 key evidence uncertainties (‘indicative questions’) for prioritization. Using the JLA prioritization framework, this resulted in 10 priority uncertainties in evidence, from which 16 research questions were developed. These could be summarized under the following 5 themes: communication of allergens both within the food supply chain and then to the end consumer (ensuring trust in allergen communication); the impact of socio‐economic factors on consumers with FHS; drivers of severe reactions; mechanism(s) underlying loss of tolerance in FHS; and the risks posed by novel allergens/processing.
Discussion
In this first research prioritization exercise for food allergy and FHS, key priorities identified to protect the food‐allergic public were strategies to help allergic consumers to make confident food choices, prevention of FHS and increasing understanding of socio‐economic impacts. Diagnosis and treatment of FHS was not considered in this prioritization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.