A recent workshop entitled ''The Family Name as Socio-Cultural Feature and Genetic Metaphor: From Concepts to Methods" was held in Paris in December 2010, sponsored by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and by the journal Human Biology. This workshop was intended to foster a debate on questions related to the family names and to compare different multidisciplinary approaches involving geneticists, historians, geographers, sociologists and social anthropologists. This collective paper presents a collection of selected communications.In 1983, Human Biology published a special May issue (volume 55, issue 2) devoted to surnames as tools to evaluate average consanguinity, to assess population isolation and structure, and to estimate the intensity and directionality of migrations. Major contributions written by scholars gave a special relevance to this special issue that remained, for many years, a reference (for a review see Lasker 1985; Colantonio et al. 2011).Since that time, many surname studies have focused on extending knowledge on population structure, isonymy, and migration (for an exhaustive synthesis see Colantonio et al. 2003) been applied to about thirty societies all around the world with a geographic scale that ranges from a household or village, to a whole continent. Further and quite recent research put forward a spectrum of methods to analyze Y-chromosome DNA polymorphisms, thus allowing the examination of the degree of cosegregation of family names and Y-chromosome haplotypes, at least in patrilineal naming practice.The workshop The Family Name as Socio-Cultural Feature and Genetic Metaphor: From Concepts to Methods (Paris, France, 5-6 December, 2010) was organized to go further and, even if some presentations were focused towards more classical research, to pinpoint some particularly innovative aspects of current surname research. This summary article is meant to be a synthesis of the papers presented during the workshop; there are two main strands.The first research direction relies on the use of surname databases that are increasingly exhaustive and easy to analyse thanks to the spread of digital techniques. In this respect, Pablo Mateos, James Cheshire and Paul Longley's UCL Worldnames database (which includes about 6 million surnames registered in 26 different countries, http://worldnames.publicprofiler.org/), constitutes an impressive quantity of information and an exciting tool for future research (Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in the Spatial Analysis of Names, this article). Unfortunately, this large collection of data comes from different sources, such as national electoral registers or telephone directories, and problems of homogenization and representativeness need to be discussed further as they could not be addressed at the workshop. In the same way, long distance comparisons between stocks of surnames with very different historical and linguistic origins are also a challenge and deserve particular attention. The corpus of family names described by Ka...