Background Assessment of residents’ body positioning during laparoscopy has not been adequately investigated. This study presents a novel computer vision technique to automate ergonomic evaluation and demonstrates this approach through simulated laparoscopy. Methods Surgical residents at a single academic institution were video recorded performing tasks from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). Ergonomics were assessed by 2 raters using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. Additionally, a novel computer software program was used to measure ergonomics from the video recordings. All participants completed a survey on musculoskeletal complaints, which was graded by severity. Results Ten residents participated; all performed FLS in postures that exceeded acceptable ergonomic risks as determined by both the human and computerized RULA scores ( P < .001). Lower-level residents scored worse than upper-level residents on the human-graded RULA assessment ( P = .04). There was no difference in computer-graded RULA scores by resident level ( P = .39) and computer-graded scores did not correlate with human scores ( P = .75). Shoulder and wrist position were the greatest contributors to higher computer-graded scores ( P < .001). Self-reported musculoskeletal complaints did not differ at resident level ( P = .74); however, all residents reported having at least 1 form of musculoskeletal complaint occurring “often.” Conclusions Surgery residents demonstrated suboptimal ergonomics while performing simulated laparoscopic tasks. A novel computer program to measure ergonomics did not agree with the scores generated by the human raters, although it concluded that resident ergonomics remain a concern, especially regarding shoulder and wrist positioning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.