Adrenal cysts are very rare lesions, especially with parasitic origin. But with the wider application of ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) more adrenal cysts are detected incidentally. To gain more insight into this entity, the records of nine patients with hydatid cysts of adrenal gland seen at our department from January 1980 till January 2002 are reviewed. There were four men and five women, and their ages ranged from 15 to 80 years (median: 41 years). All of the patients had unilateral cysts. Seven cysts were located on the right and two on the left side. Five of the cysts were primary and four were secondary. In three patients the cysts were found incidentally. The most common presenting symptom was pain, which was present in six patients. An indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test was positive in six cases. In all patients, US and CT successfully imaged all cysts, but the definitive diagnosis was made by macroscopic and microscopic examination of the cyst's content. The patients were treated surgically. In all patients adrenal glands with the cystic masses were removed. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range: 6-64 months). No evidence of recurrence was found in any patient. It should not be forgotten that cystic masses of the upper abdomen might also originate from the adrenal gland. The etiology and nature of the cyst should be well researched, and appropriate treatment should be given as soon as possible. Surgical excision of the gland, including the cyst is the treatment of choice.
Objective To investigate the rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity in asymptomatic pregnant women admitted to hospital for delivery in a Turkish pandemic center. Study Design This prospective cohort study was conducted in Ankara City Hospital between April, 15, 2020 and June, 5, 2020. A total of 206 asymptomatic pregnant women (103 low-risk pregnant women without any defined risk factor and 103 high-risk pregnant women) were screened for SARS-CoV-2 positivity upon admission to hospital for delivery. Detection of SARS-CoV2 in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples was performed by Real Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) method targeting RdRp (RNA dependent RNA polymerase) gene. Two groups were compared in terms of demographic features, clinical characteristics and SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Results Three of the 206 pregnant women participating in the study had positive RT-PCR tests (1.4 %) and all positive cases were in the high-risk pregnancy group. Although, one case in the high-risk pregnancy group had developed symptoms highly suspicious for COVID-19, two repeated RT-PCR tests were negative. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity rate was significantly higher in the high-risk pregnancy group (2.9 % vs 0%, p = 0.04). Conclusion Healthcare professionals should be cautious in the labor and delivery of high-risk pregnant women during the pandemic period and universal testing for COVID-19 may be considered in selected populations.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are prone to infection because glucose in the skin, urine, mucous membranes, and tears promotes growth of microorganisms. Conjunctival flora develops soon after birth, and some saprophytic conjunctival flora play a pathogenic role when immune function is compromised, which can lead to serious infection. DM is one condition that may compromise immune status. In lacrimal function tests of DM patients, a decrease in breakup time (BUT) of lacrimal film and a decrease in Schirmer's test results were seen. In the present study, conjunctival flora in patients with DM was compared with that in controls with regard to type and duration of diabetes and results of lacrimal function tests. Seventeen patients with type 1 DM (n=34 eyes), 66 patients with type 2 DM (n=132 eyes), and 50 control subjects (n=100 eyes) were included. The control group consisted of age-matched patients with no ophthalmologic problems other than refractive error. Glycosylated hemoglobin values were measured with highpressure liquid chromatography with the Hi-AUTOA1c analyzer (Kyoto Daiichi Kagatu Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Type and duration of diabetes and demographic data were recorded, and routine ophthalmologic examinations were performed; the BUT of lacrimal film was determined, and the results of Schirmer's test were assessed. Microbiologic sampling was performed twice for both eyes with sterile cotton swabs. One sample was incubated in 2 mL of brain-heart infusion broth agar; the other was incubated for the presence of fungi in Sabouraud dextrose agar. Colony morphology, hemolysis, and Gram's stain, as well as catalase, oxidase, and coagulase tests were performed. No growth was observed in 12 of 17 patients (35.4%) with type 1 DM, 28 of 66 patients (21.2%) with type 2 DM, and 25 of 50 control subjects (50%). Staphylococcus epidermidis (11.79%) and Staphylococcus aureus (11.7%) were the most frequently isolated organisms in the type 1 DM group, and S epidermidis (24.2%) and S aureus (21.2%) were the predominant organisms in the type 2 DM group. In control subjects, S epidermidis (22%), S aureus (12%), and Corynebacterium spp (10%) were the most frequently isolated organisms, and the number of eyes with growth of S aureus was significantly higher in the type 2 DM group than in the other groups (P<.01). Patients with diabetes are more prone to postoperative endophthalmitis than are nondiabetics, and preoperative application of antiseptic or antimicrobial agents to the conjunctiva may not sterilize the area. Impaired integrity of the posterior capsule may also increase the risk of endophthalmitis. Postoperative endophthalmitis is usually associated with gram-positive organisms (75%-80%); gram-negative organisms (15%-29%) and fungi (3%-13%) account for a smaller number of cases. A high rate of resistance to penicillin, ampicillin, and tetracycline was observed in S aureus isolates, although resistance to vancomycin was absent, rendering this molecule the most effective therapeutic option. In this study, S epidermi...
As it provides results of exophthalmometry for the Turkish population, our study is important. However, larger, nationwide, and multisite studies examining more subjects may provide more valuable data about the Turkish population.
OBJECTIVE— The aim of the present study was to investigate any relationship between serum ubiquitin levels and electroneurographic changes in peripheral nerves for patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— The study involved 34 patients(19 men, 15 women; mean age 46 ± 13 years) with type 2 diabetes. Serum ubiquitin values were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Measurement of nerve conduction velocity (NCV) was performed on three motor(median, tibial, and peroneal) and three sensory (median, ulnar, and sural)nerves. The value of motor compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was obtained from the sum of median, tibial, and peroneal motor nerve amplitudes,and sensory compound nerve action potential (CNAP) was computed as the sum of median and ulnar sensory nerve amplitudes. RESULTS— Patients with diabetes were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 8) had normal electroneurography results, group 2 (n = 8) had slowed NCV, and group 3 (n = 18) had low values of motor CMAP and/or sensory CNAP as well as slowed NCV. Mean ubiquitin level in group 3 (20.4 ± 2.9 ng/dl) was significantly higher than that in group 1 (11.2 ± 1.1 ng/dl, t = 11.5, P <0.0001) and group 2 (13.2 ± 2.7 ng/dl, t = 5.9, P< 0.0001). Serum ubiquitin levels were inversely correlated with motor CMAP(r = -0.68) and sensory CNAP (r = -0.61) values. CONCLUSIONS— The results of this study indicate that there could be a relationship between the diminished amplitudes of axons of the peripheral nerve and the increase in serum ubiquitin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further studies are required to confirm this relationship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.