Models of source–sink population dynamics have to make assumptions about whether, and eventually how, demographic parameters in source habitats are dependent on the demography in sink habitats. However, the empirical basis for making such assumptions has been weak. Here we report a study on experimental root vole populations, where estimates of demographic parameters were contrasted between source patches in source–sink (treatment) and source–source systems (control). In the presence of a sink patch (simulated by a pulsed removal of immigrants), source‐patch populations failed to increase over the breeding season, mainly due to a high spatially density‐dependent dispersal rate from source to sink patches. The per capita recruitment rate was almost two times higher in source–sink than in the source–source systems, but this did not compensate for the loss rate due to dispersal from source to sink patches. Sex ratio in the source–sink systems became less female biased, probably as a result of an enhanced frequency of dispersal movements in females. Good knowledge of the degree of density‐and habitat‐dependent dispersal is critical for predicting the dynamics of source–sink populations.

The effect of population density on immigration success of young root voles was studied in a factorial experiment where immigrants of three different types were translocated from donor populations to recipient habitat patches with experimentally manipulated population sizes. The different types of immigrants were: (1) residents, animals that had remained in their natal patch; (2) colonists, animals that already had successfully dispersed and settled in a new patch; and (3) transients, animals roaming around in a non‐habitable matrix area of the donor population. Generally, we found evidence for a negative density‐dependent immigration success in terms of survival, rate of sexual maturation and body growth rate. With respect to the survival rate, the degree of density dependence differed among the three immigrant types. Our findings are discussed with respect to the degree of rescue effect immigrants may have on a recipient population depending on population density, and also its relevance concerning translocation of individuals for conserving endangered populations.

No abstract

Turnover of individuals is assumed to cause disruptions of social organization, followed by reduced reproduction and survival. We tested how male turnover (removal of resident males and their replacement by unfamiliar males) affected population performance in experimental root vole (Microtus oeconomus) populations. The treatment simulated predation of adult males, with the subsequent replacement by immigrants, and provided insight into the interaction between extrinsic (i.e., predation) and intrinsic (i.e., social organization) factors. We showed that recruitment and female survival dramatically declined and that reproduction commenced slightly later in treatment populations compared with control populations. The treatment nearly halved the population growth rate. We suspect that recruitment failed due to infanticidal immigrating males. Reduced female survival was particularly apparent in treatment populations in which females exhibited a high degree of spatial overlap. Our experimental results show how males may significantly shape population dynamics and suggest how predation and social factors interact mechanistically.

No abstract

5Norsk Polarinstitutt, Seabird ecology and management, Polarmiljøsenteret, 9296 Tromsø, Norway Summary 1. Individuals should benefit from settling in high-quality habitats, but dispersers born under favourable conditions have a better physical condition and should therefore be more successful at settling in high-quality habitats. 2. We tested these predictions with root voles (Microtus oeconomus) by a manipulation of individual condition through litter-size enlargement and reduction during lactation combined with a manipulation of habitat quality through degradation of the vegetation cover. We accurately monitored movements of 149 juveniles during a settlement and breeding period of 3 months. 3. The litter size treatment had long-lasting effects on body size, life-history traits and home range size, but did not influence dispersal behaviour. 4. Different stages of dispersal were influenced by habitat quality. In low-quality patches, females dispersed earlier, spent more time prospecting their environment before settling, and settlers had a smaller adult body size than in high-quality patches. Preference and competition for high-quality patches is likely adaptive as it increased fitness both in terms of survival and reproduction. 5. We found no interactive effect of individual condition and habitat quality on natal dispersal and habitat selection. 6. These findings suggest that immediate conditions are more important determinants of dispersal decisions than conditions experienced early in life.

No abstract

Neighbour-stranger discrimination occurs when individuals respond with more aggression to strangers than to territorial neighbours -a phenomenon termed the "dear enemy phenomenon" (DEP). We investigated the DEP with male and female root voles (Microtus oeconomus Pallas 1776) using field dyadic arena tests conducted in enclosures where we could test for the effects of familiarity (familiar versus stranger), ownership (resident versus intruder status) and resource-holding potential (body mass) on territorial behaviours. The results showed that males put more effort into territorial defence than females, and males could discriminate between neighbours and strangers. In males, aggressiveness was influenced by a significant two-way interaction between treatment and ownership. Male residents were more aggressive towards stranger intruders than towards neighbour intruders, while male intruders were less aggressive towards stranger residents than towards neighbour residents. In females, neither treatment nor ownership status had a significant effect on aggressiveness. Familiar males performed more social behaviours, but less non-social behaviours, than stranger males. Furthermore, there was a clear dominance hierarchy between residents and intruders in stranger dyads, with the male territory holders dominating the intruder in pairwise interactions. To our knowledge, these results demonstrate for the first time DEP in a small mammal with a known pedigree and present the first evidence for "prior resident advantage" in voles. We argue that both ownership status and familiarity status affect how much an individual invests in territory defence. The benefits of neighbour-stranger discrimination for male root voles and the absence of neighbour-stranger discrimination in female root voles are discussed.