Background Metabolites of the kynurenine pathway (mKP) relate to important aspects of heart failure pathophysiology, such as inflammation, energy-homeostasis, apoptosis, and oxidative stress. We aimed to investigate whether mKP predict mortality in patients with heart failure. Methods The study included 202 patients with heart failure (73.8% with coronary artery disease (CAD)), propensity score matched to 384 controls without heart disease, and 807 controls with CAD (71%). All underwent coronary angiography and ventriculography at baseline. Plasma mKP, pyridoxal 5'phosphate (PLP) and CRP were measured at baseline. Case-control differences were assessed by logistic regression and survival by Cox regression, adjusted for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, ejection fraction, PLP, eGFR and CRP. Effect measures are reported per standard deviation increments. Results Higher plasma levels of kynurenine, 3-hydroxykynurenine (HK), quinolinic acid (QA), the kynurenine-tryptophan-ratio (KTR) and the ratio of HK to xanthurenic acid (HK/XA) were detected in heart failure compared to both control groups. The mortality rate per 1000 person-years was 55.5 in patients with heart failure, 14.6 in controls without heart disease and 22.2 in CAD controls. QA [HR 1.80, p = 0.013], HK [HR 1.77, p = 0.005], HK/XA [HR 1.67, p < 0.001] and KTR [HR 1.55, p = 0.009] were associated with increased mortality in patients with heart failure, while XA [HR 0.68-0.80, p = 0.013-0.037] were associated with lower mortality in all groups. HK and HK/XA had weak associations with increased mortality in CAD-controls.
Insulin given at immediate reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size in the in vitro and the ex vivo rat heart. In vivo, insulin may cause hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia and elevation of catecholamines, potentially harmful during an acute myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tolerance and safety of intracoronary insulin infusions in a porcine model applying percutaneous intervention techniques.
Mechanical assist devices in refractory cardiac arrest are increasingly employed. We compared the hemodynamics and organ perfusion during cardiac arrest with either veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or biventricular assisted circulation combining left- and right-sided impeller devices (BiPella) in an acute experimental setting. Twenty pigs were randomized in two equal groups receiving circulatory support either by ECMO or by BiPella during 40 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) followed by three attempts of cardioversion, and if successful, 60 minute observation with spontaneous, unsupported circulation. Hemodynamic variables were continuously recorded. Tissue perfusion was evaluated by fluorescent microsphere injections. Cardiac function was visualized by intracardiac echocardiography. During VF device output, carotid flow, kidney perfusion, mean aortic pressure (AOPmean), and mean left ventricular pressure (LVPmean) were all significantly higher in the ECMO group, and serum-lactate values were lower compared with the BiPella group. No difference in myocardial or cerebral perfusion was observed between groups. In 15 animals with sustained cardiac function for 60 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation, left ventricular subendocardial blood flow rate averaged 0.59 ± 0.05 ml/min/gm during VF compared with 0.31 ± 0.07 ml/min/gm in five animals with circulatory collapse (p = 0.005). Corresponding values for the midmyocardium was 0.91 ± 0.06 vs. 0.65 ± 0.15 ml/min/gm (p = 0.085). Both BiPella and ECMO could sustain vital organ function. ECMO provided a more optimal systemic circulatory support related to near physiologic output. Myocardial tissue perfusion and sustained cardiac function were related to coronary perfusion pressure during VF, irrespective of mode of circulatory support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.