Coral bleaching has been defined as a general phenomenon, whereby reef corals turn visibly pale because of the loss of their symbiotic dinof lagellates and͞or algal pigments during periods of exposure to elevated seawater temperatures. During the summer of 1997, seawater temperatures in the Florida Keys remained at or above 30°C for more than 6 weeks, and extensive coral bleaching was observed. Bleached colonies of the dominant Caribbean reefbuilding species, Montastrea faveolata and Montastrea franksi, were sampled over a depth gradient from 1 to 17 m during this period of elevated temperature and contained lower densities of symbiotic dinof lagellates in deeper corals than seen in previous ''nonbleaching'' years. Fluorescence analysis by pulse-amplitude modulation f luorometry revealed severe damage to photosystem II (PSII) in remaining symbionts within the corals, with greater damage indicated at deeper depths. Dinof lagellates with the greatest loss in PSII activity also showed a significant decline in the D1 reaction center protein of PSII, as measured by immunoblot analysis. Laboratory experiments on the temperature-sensitive species Montastrea annularis, as well as temperature-sensitive and temperature-tolerant cultured symbiotic dinof lagellates, confirmed the temperature-dependent loss of PSII activity and concomitant decrease in D1 reaction center protein seen in symbionts collected from corals naturally bleached on the reef. In addition, variation in PSII repair was detected, indicating that perturbation of PSII protein turnover rates during photoinhibition at elevated temperatures underlies the physiological collapse of symbionts in corals susceptible to heat-induced bleaching.Global episodes of coral bleaching, where reef-building corals lose their endosymbiotic dinoflagellates and͞or algal pigments during summertime elevation of seawater temperature, are recurring with increasing frequency and severity (1, 2). Previous studies have shown that symbiotic dinoflagellates maintained in culture and within the host are susceptible to thermal stress (3-5). Likewise, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and UV radiation may act in concert with elevated temperatures to elicit a bleaching response (6, 7), yet the underlying biochemical causes for these phenomena remain obscure. Numerous components of the photosynthetic pathway are known to be susceptible to damage by elevated temperature, especially at points within photosystem II (PSII). These include the oxygen-evolving complex (8, 9), the reaction center (10), as well as connectivity between the lightharvesting complex and the reaction center of PSII (11). In plants and green algae, thermal perturbation can predispose the photosynthetic apparatus to damage by PAR, thus inducing a state of photoinhibition (12). The primary target of photoinhibitory damage at the PSII reaction center is the D1 protein (13), which normally exhibits high rates of turnover involving light-dependent inactivation and degradation coupled with de novo synthesis and in...
The specific identity of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium spp.) from most zooxanthellate corals is unknown. In a survey of symbiotic cnidarians from the southern Great Barrier Reef (GBR), 23 symbiont types were identified from 86 host species representing 40 genera. A majority (Ͼ85%) of these symbionts belong to a single phylogenetic clade or subgenus (''C'') composed of closely related (as assessed by sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer region and the ribosomal large subunit gene), yet ecologically and physiologically distinct, types. A few prevalent symbiont types, or generalists, dominate the coral community of the southern GBR, whereas many rare and/or specific symbionts, or specialists, are found uniquely within certain host taxa. The comparison of symbiont diversity between southern GBR and Caribbean reefs shows an inverse relationship between coral diversity and symbiont diversity, perhaps as a consequence of more-rapid diversification of Caribbean symbionts. Among clade C types, generalists C1 and C3 are common to both Caribbean and southern GBR symbiont assemblages, whereas the rest are regionally endemic. Possibly because of environmental changes in the Caribbean after geographic isolation through the Quaternary period, a high proportion of Caribbean fauna associate with symbiont taxa from two other distantly related Symbiodinium clades (A and B) that rarely occur in Pacific hosts. The resilience of Porites spp. and the resistance of Montipora digitata to thermal stress and bleaching are partially explained by their association with a thermally tolerant symbiont type, whereas the indiscriminant widespread bleaching and death among certain Pacific corals, during El Niño Southern Oscillation events, are influenced by associations with symbionts possessing higher sensitivity to thermal stress.Cnidarians such as hard corals, soft corals, sea fans, and anemones are the principal faunal constituents of benthic AcknowledgmentsWe thank Jill Torregiani, María del Carmen Gómez-Cabrera, Paul Fisher, and Michael Stat for assisting with the collection and processing of samples, as well as M. J. Van Oppen for her help with determining the specific identity of subclades C1, C2, and C3 (Van Oppen et al. 2001).
Bleaching of reef corals is a phenomenon linked to temperature stress which involves loss of the symbiotic algae of the coral, which are known as zooxanthellae, and/or loss of algal pigments. The photosynthetic efficiency of zooxanthellae within the corals Montastrea annularis, Agaricia lamarki, Agaricia agaricites and Siderastrea radians was examined by pulse‐amplitude modulation fluorometry (PAM) during exposure to elevated temperatures (30–36°C). Zooxanthellae within M. annularis and A. lamarki were found to be more sensitive to elevated temperature, virtually complete disruption of photosynthesis being noted during exposure to temperatures of 32 and 34°C. The photosynthetic efficiency of zooxanthellae within S. radians and A. agaricites decreased to a lesser extent. Differences in the loss of algal cells on an aerial basis and in the cellular chlorophyll concentration were also found between these species. By combining the non‐invasive PAM technique with whole‐cell fluorescence of freshly isolated zooxanthellae, we have identified fundamental differences in the physiology of the symbionts within different species of coral. Zooxanthellae within M. annularis appear to be more susceptible to heat‐induced damage at or near the reaction centre of Photosystem II, while zooxanthellae living in S. radians remain capable of dissipating excess excitation energy through non‐photochemical pathways, thereby protecting the photosystem from damage during heat exposure.
Here we describe the in vitro reconstitution of photosystem I light-harvesting complexes with pigments and proteins (Lhca1 and Lhca4) obtained by overexpression of tomato Lhca genes in Escherichia coli. Using Lhca1 and Lhca4 individually for reconstitution results in monomeric pigmentproteins, whereas a combination thereof yields a dimeric complex. Interactions of the apoproteins is highly specific, as reconstitution of either of the two constituent proteins in combination with a light-harvesting protein of photosystem II does not result in dimerization. The reconstituted Lhca1͞4, but not complexes obtained with either Lhca1 or Lhca4 alone, closely resembles the native LHCI-730 dimer from tomato leaves with regard to spectroscopic properties, pigment composition, and stoichiometry. Monomeric complexes of Lhca1 or Lhca4 possess lower pigment͞protein ratios, indicating that interactions of the two subunits not only facilitates pigment reorganization but also recruitment of additional pigments. In addition to higher averages of chlorophyll a͞b ratios in monomeric complexes than in LHCI-730, comparative f luorescence and CD spectra demonstrate that heterodimerization involves preferential ligation of more chlorophyll b.Precise assembly and alignment of pigments with the various proteins encoded by a family of nuclear Lhc genes underly the formation of the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of thylakoid membranes, enabling the collection of solar energy and its transmission to the two photochemically active reaction centers. Although the major LHCII has been analyzed in detail with respect to protein and pigment composition and organization (1), information about LHCs of photosystem I (PSI) are limited, mostly because they are difficult to isolate abundantly in an intact state. The original finding that four proteins of about 21 to 24 kDa form the LHCI (2) is now widely accepted, and the respective genes have been identified, cloned, and sequenced (3, 4). Recently, closely related photosystem I antenna components have been identified in red algae (5, 6). In vascular plants, there are two major LHCI subfractions with different protein compositions and fluorescence properties (7-9). One, LHCI-680, is enriched in polypeptides of 24 and 23 kDa (Lhca3 and Lhca2, respectively), has characteristic 77-K fluorescence at 680 nm and a low density in sucrose gradients, and is regarded as monomeric also on the basis of electrophoretic mobility. The LHCI-680 complex can be resolved into two green bands, one enriched in Lhca2 and the other in Lhca3, showing that both proteins are pigment binding (8, 10). The second complex, LHCI-730, exhibits 77-K fluorescence around 730 nm, has a higher sedimentation coefficient, is associated with proteins of 22 and 21 kDa (Lhca1 and Lhca4, respectively), and is considered to be dimeric (7-11). Further dissection of the LHCI-730 complex has not been achieved, leaving open the question of the extent to which both constitutent apoproteins function in pigment binding and whether the complex i...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.