Ultrasound is unlikely to increase the accuracy of injections into an unseptated FDC. It may aid in injection of a septated FDC; however, that remains to be statistically demonstrated.

The braided cruciate was the strongest of the tested flexor tendon repairs. The 2-mm gapping and maximum load to failure for this repair approached similar historical strength of other 6- and 8-stranded repairs. In this study, suture cost was negligible in the overall repair cost and should be not a determining factor in choosing a repair.

Background: Controversy exists with regard to the amount of fracture displacement that warrants surgical fixation of medial epicondyle fractures. Inaccurate determination of degree of displacement on plain radiographs may account for the disputed management. Recently, a novel distal humerus axial radiograph technique has been developed to improve the accuracy of radiographs. The purposes of the study are 2-fold; to identify the anatomic orientation of the medial elbow epicondyle physis in children and to compare the accuracy of determining fracture displacement between axial radiographs and standard anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs in a cadaveric medial epicondyle fracture model. Methods: Twelve pediatric elbow computed tomographic scans and 19 pediatric elbow magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed for the orientation of the medial elbow physis. After determining the correct orientation, 15 adult cadaveric medial epicondyle fracture models were created at displacements of 2, 5, 10 mm, and maximum displacement with elbow at 90 degrees of flexion. A linear mixed model regression analysis was used to compare displacement based on the axial versus the AP radiographic methods. Results: The medial epicondyle physis was found to be a posterior structure angled distally at ~36 degrees (range, 10.7 to 49.6) and angled posteriorly at 45 degrees (range, 32.2 to 59). The AP radiograph significantly underestimated displacement relative to the axial radiograph at 5 mm [mean difference, −1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.9 to −0.3], at 10 mm (mean difference, −4.5; 95% CI, −5.8 to −3.2 mm), and at maximal displacement (mean, 15 mm; range, 13 to 20 mm) (mean difference, −7.1; 95% CI, −8.3 to −5.8). Conclusions: The medial epicondyle physis of the distal humerus is a posterior structure angled distally and posteriorly. When displacement was >5 mm, the distal humerus axial radiograph technique was significantly more accurate than the AP radiograph technique at determining actual fracture displacement in our adult cadaveric fracture models. Therefore, we recommend clinicians to include the axial radiograph view during the evaluation of patients with medial epicondyle fractures. Clinical Relevance: This study provides further insight into the location and orientation of the medial humeral epicondyle physis, and further supports the improved accuracy of the distal humerus axial radiograph at detecting displacement in medial epicondyle fractures.

No abstract

Surgeons undergoing additional hand fellowship training may show improved outcomes in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, no effect was seen on nerve injury or recurrence of symptoms.

Background: To identify the time course for efficacy of corticosteroid injections in the treatment of trigger finger. Methods: A prospective single-center observational study was conducted, consisting of 38 patients with 41 trigger digits that were injected. Enrolled patients completed an initial Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire to determine the severity of their symptoms. Following the injection, patients were contacted at scheduled time points for up to 12 weeks to determine if, and when, objective resolution of symptoms occurred. Patients who received additional treatment, such as a second injection or surgery, and those who did not have objective relief of symptoms by 12 weeks were classified as failed. Upon symptom resolution or injection failure, patients were given a DASH exit questionnaire. Results: 30 of 41 injected trigger digits resolved and 11 failed treatment with a single corticosteroid injection. The latest that any study participant experienced resolution of symptoms was 69 days. At 38 days, the rate of resolution of the study population slowed significantly. Conclusions: Although symptomatic resolution of trigger finger from a single corticosteroid injection can occur early on, a follow-up of 4 weeks (28 days) does not allow enough time for symptom resolution. The earliest a surgeon and patient should consider a secondary treatment is at 38 days. After 69 days without resolution, both surgeon and patient can be confident that further treatment is needed.

Barbotage, the multiple puncture of cutaneous warts, may be a reasonable treatment with minimal morbidity.

No abstract