Fifty-four patients who had surgery to repair a chronic rotator cuff tear (54 shoulders) were followed for an average of 25.9 months (range, 16 to 43). Forty-nine of 54 patients had at least 20 months of followup. The average age of the male patients (N = 37) was 52 (range, 24 to 80) and of the female patients (N = 17) was 56 (range, 38 to 72). All of these patients received a functional evaluation based on the Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Society classification system. Forty-eight patients had an individual examination and 33 patients had an isokinetic strength evaluation. There were 43 patients (80%) with a satisfactory functional result and 11 (20%) with an unsatisfactory result. Unsatisfactory results were associated with large and massive tears and decreased postoperative range of motion. Good functional results were obtained by open repair and subacromial decompression for rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment did not affect the functional outcome, but it did increase costs by about $2000 per patient. Arthroscopy is useful to define tear size, which may affect the surgical approach, but the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral problems did not alter the functional result. The routine use of arthroscopy before rotator cuff repair is costly, not effective, and therefore not recommended.
A method of reconstruction for recurrent posterior dislocation of the shoulder is presented, as well as the results of soft tissue repair in nine patients. There were no recurrences. There was one unsatisfactory result with restriction of activity and motion. Because of eight satisfactory results and no recurrences, we recommend soft tissue reconstruction for this entity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.