The new scale may be used to explore differences in students' perception and attitudes towards multi-professional learning. Further work is necessary to validate the scale amongst a larger population.
Twenty-eight undergraduate degree students from seven health care professions attended a two-day pilot course. Using small multiprofessional groups, final-year students from occupational therapy, orthoptics, therapy radiography, nursing, physiotherapy, medicine and dentistry explored professional roles and clinical problem-solving using a theme-based approach. A balance of didactic and interactive small-group learning enabled them to identify issues surrounding multiprofessional teamworking and collaboration in the National Health Service. Evaluation results showed that the course increased knowledge and understanding of other health care professions, developed more positive attitudes and demonstrated the importance of multiprofessional teamwork and communication. Participating students believed that both early and regular opportunities for shared learning should be essential aspects of undergraduate courses.
SummaryEffective care in hospitals and in the community requires doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals to work together to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients. In the UK, a shift in emphasis towards a primary care led service and recent changes to the ways in which healthcare is funded and organised, are profoundly affecting traditional patterns of working. Boundaries which define the roles and responsibilities of individual professions are becoming less clear and there is increasing overlap of knowledge and skills. The provision of effective patient care now depends much more on the individual practitioner's understanding ofthe need to collaborate within and between healthcare teams in community settings and the care provided in hospitals. This paper describes some of the ways in which those providing education and training for the professions are seeking to create opportunities for learners which will not only help them to understand the complexities of working in a multiprofessional healthcare environment, but also enable them to develop the skills and attitudes they need for interprofessional working. However, it is not yet established whether 'learning together' during basic training will result in better 'working together' in practice. Higher education institutions are understandably cautious about adopting new learning methods which make extra demands on decreasing resources. More studies are therefore needed to show whether interprofessional learning during basic education has an impact on future working practice.
Clinical teaching is part of a doctor's professional life, whether it takes place in surgeries, clinics or in hospitals, with undergraduates, postgraduate trainees or colleagues. Learning to teach well means questioning the effectiveness of some of the old teaching methods, exploring new ideas and trying out new methods in different situations. It means collaborating more closely with colleagues and learners about developing and implementing new approaches to medical education. This paper is the first of an occasional series of articles about the practical aspects of clinical teaching. The articles have the following characteristics: they explore contemporary themes in medical and health care education; they use up-to-date references; they are a quick and easy resource for busy teachers; they explore new ideas about teaching and learning, and they provide a reference list of relevant papers. This article deals with recent ideas about clinical teachers' knowledge and roles, teaching and organizational strategies, and the measurement of teaching effectiveness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.