Our results confirm data published previously that if the microgap was moved coronally away from the alveolar crest, less bone loss would occur and if the microgap was moved apical to the alveolar crest, greater amounts of bone resorption were present. This remodeling is not dependent on early and immediate loading of the implants or on immediate postextraction insertion.

Titanium nitride (TiN) has been used in many fields as a surgical instrument coating that makes the surgical materials more resistant to wear and corrosion. The aim of the present study was an in vivo evaluation of the bacterial adhesion to TiN-coated (test) and uncoated (control) titanium implants. Six patients aged between 21 and 25 years and in excellent systemic health participated in the study. All of the participants gave their informed consent. The participants were selected on the basis of good periodontal health and no signs of mouth breathing. In each of the 6 participants, a removable acrylic device was adapted to the molar-premolar region of each quadrant of the jaws. One 4 x 13 mm titanium implant was glued to the buccal aspect of each device. The plasma spray covered 11.5 mm of the body of the implant, whereas the neck was machined titanium. Test implants were glued to the right devices and control implants were glued to the left devices. After 24 hours, the implants were removed from each device and processed for scanning electron microscopy for evaluation of the machined portion of the implant covered by bacteria. A total of 24 implants were used in this study, 12 test and 12 control. Surface characterization of the machined portion of the neck of the implant was performed on an additional 10 implants (5 test and 5 control). On test implants the implant surface covered by bacteria was significantly lower compared with that of control implants (P = .0001). The surface roughness was similar in both groups. TiN surfaces showed a significant reduction of the presence of bacteria, and this fact could probably be important in the decrease of the inflammation of the peri-implant soft tissues.

TiN coating demonstrated a good biocompatibility, did not have untoward effects on the periimplant bone formation, and did not change the surface roughness values.