Pregnancy is increasingly undertaken in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, conversely, CKD is increasingly diagnosed in pregnancy: up to 3 % of pregnancies are estimated to be complicated by CKD. The heterogeneity of CKD (accounting for stage, hypertension and proteinuria) and the rarity of several kidney diseases make risk assessment difficult and therapeutic strategies are often based upon scattered experiences and small series. In this setting, the aim of this position statement of the Kidney and Pregnancy Study Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology is to review the literature, and discuss the experience in the clinical management of CKD in pregnancy. CKD is associated with an increased risk for adverse pregnancy-related outcomes since its early stage, also in the absence of hypertension and proteinuria, thus supporting the need for a multidisciplinary follow-up in all CKD patients. CKD stage, hypertension and proteinuria are interrelated, but they are also independent risk factors for adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Among the different kidney diseases, patients with glomerulonephritis and immunologic diseases are at higher risk of developing or increasing proteinuria and hypertension, a picture often difficult to differentiate from preeclampsia. The risk is higher in active immunologic diseases, and in those cases that are detected or flare up during pregnancy. Referral to tertiary care centres for multidisciplinary follow-up and tailored approaches are warranted. The risk of maternal death is, almost exclusively, reported in systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis, which share with diabetic nephropathy an increased risk for perinatal death of the babies. Conversely, patients with kidney malformation, autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease, stone disease, and previous upper urinary tract infections are at higher risk for urinary tract infections, in turn associated with prematurity. No risk for malformations other than those related to familiar urinary tract malformations is reported in CKD patients, with the possible exception of diabetic nephropathy. Risks of worsening of the renal function are differently reported, but are higher in advanced CKD. Strict follow-up is needed, also to identify the best balance between maternal and foetal risks. The need for further multicentre studies is underlined.

Timing of dialysis start is not clear, considering also the different support therapies; successful pregnancy is possible in both PD and HD; high efficiency and strict integration with residual kidney function are pivotal in both treatments, the blood urea nitrogen test being perhaps a useful marker in this context. To date, long-hour HD has provided the best results. Strict, personalized obstetric surveillance is warranted; therapies should be aimed at avoiding vitamin B12, folate and iron deficits, and at correcting anaemia; vitamin D and calcium administration is safe and recommended. Women on dialysis should be advised that pregnancy is possible, albeit rare, with both types of dialysis treatment, and that a success rate of over 75% may be achieved. High dialysis efficiency and frequent controls are needed to optimize outcomes.

Having a baby while on dialysis is rare but not impossible, though early mortality remains high. There is a 'scale of probability' estimating that women on dialysis have a 10-fold lower probability of delivering a live-born baby than those who have undergone renal transplantation, who in turn have a 10-fold lower probability of delivering a live-born baby as compared with the overall population.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is often considered to be the method best able to restore fertility in a woman with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, pregnancies in KT are not devoid of risks (in particular prematurity, small for gestational age babies, and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy). An ideal profile of the potential KT mother includes “normal” or “good” kidney function (usually defined as glomerular filtration rate, GFR ≥ 60 ml/min), scant or no proteinuria (usually defined as below 500 mg/dl), normal or well controlled blood pressure (one drug only and no sign of end-organ damage), no recent acute rejection, good compliance and low-dose immunosuppression, without the use of potentially teratogen drugs (mycophenolic acid and m-Tor inhibitors) and an interval of at least 1–2 years after transplantation. In this setting, there is little if any risk of worsening of the kidney function. Less is known about how to manage “non-ideal” situations, such as a pregnancy a short time after KT, or one in the context of hypertension or a failing kidney. The aim of this position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology is to review the literature and discuss what is known about the clinical management of CKD after KT, with particular attention to women who start a pregnancy in non-ideal conditions. While the experience in such cases is limited, the risks of worsening the renal function are probably higher in cases with markedly reduced kidney function, and in the presence of proteinuria. Well-controlled hypertension alone seems less relevant for outcomes, even if its effect is probably multiplicative if combined with low GFR and proteinuria. As in other settings of kidney disease, superimposed preeclampsia (PE) is differently defined and this impairs calculating its real incidence. No specific difference between non-teratogen immunosuppressive drugs has been shown, but calcineurin inhibitors have been associated with foetal growth restriction and low birth weight. The clinical choices in cases at high risk for malformations or kidney function impairment (pregnancies under mycophenolic acid or with severe kidney-function impairment) require merging clinical and ethical approaches in which, beside the mother and child dyad, the grafted kidney is a crucial “third element”.

Preeclampsia (PE) is a protean syndrome causing a transitory kidney disease, characterised by hypertension and proteinuria, ultimately reversible after delivery. Its prevalence is variously estimated, from 3 to 5% to 10% if all the related disorders, including also pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, increase in liver enzyme, low platelets) are included. Both nephrologists and obstetricians are involved in the management of the disease, according to different protocols, and the clinical management, as well as the role for each specialty, differs worldwide. The increased awareness of the role of chronic kidney disease in pregnancy, complicating up to 3% of pregnancies, and the knowledge that PE is associated with an increased risk for development of CKD later in life have recently increased the interest and redesigned the role of the nephrologists in this context. However, while the heterogeneous definitions of PE, its recent reclassification, an emerging role for biochemical biomarkers, the growing body of epidemiological data and the new potential therapeutic interventions lead to counsel long-term follow-up, the lack of resources for chronic patients and the increasing costs of care limit the potential for preventive actions, and suggest tailoring specific interventional strategies. The aim of the present position statement of the Kidney and Pregnancy Study Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology is to review the literature and to try to identify theoretical and pragmatic bases for an agreed management of PE in the nephrological setting, with particular attention to the prevention of the syndrome (recurrent PE, presence of baseline CKD) and to the organization of the postpartum follow-up.

■ Abstract BACKGROUND:In the last decade, significant improvements have been achieved in maternal-fetal and diabetic care which make pregnancy possible in an increasing number of type 1 diabetic women with end-organ damage. Optimal counseling is important to make the advancements available to the relevant patients and to ensure the safety of mother and child. A systematic review will help to provide a survey of the available methods and to promote optimal counseling. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on diabetic nephropathy and pregnancy in type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were scanned in November 2012 (MESH, Emtree, and free terms on pregnancy and diabetic nephropathy). Studies were selected that report on pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy in 1980-2012 (i.e. since the detection of microalbuminuria). Case reports with less than 5 cases and reports on kidney grafts were excluded. Paper selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate and matched for consistency. As the relevant reports were highly heterogeneous, we decided to perform a narrative review, with discussions oriented towards the period of publication. RESULTS: Of the 1058 references considered, 34 fulfilled the selection criteria, and one was added from reference lists. The number of cases considered in the reports, which generally involved single-center studies, ranged from 5 to 311. The following issues were significant: (i) the evidence is scattered over many reports of differing format and involving small series (only 2 included over 100 patients), (ii) definitions are non-homogeneous, (iii) risks for pregnancy-related adverse events are increased (preterm delivery, caesarean section, perinatal death, and stillbirth) and do not substantially change over time, except for stillbirth (from over 10% to about 5%), (iv) the increase in risks with nephropathy progression needs confirmation in large homogeneous series, (v) the newly reported increase in malformations in diabetic nephropathy underlines the need for further studies. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneous evidence from studies on diabetic nephropathy in pregnancy emphasizes the need for further perspective studies on this issue.

Even though fertility is reduced, conception and delivery are possible in all stages of CKD. While successful planned pregnancies are increasing, an unwanted pregnancy may have long-lasting deleterious effects, hence the importance of birth control, an issue often disregarded in clinical practice. The evidence summarized in this position statement is mainly derived from the overall population, or other patient categories, in the lack of guidelines specifically addressed to CKD. Oestroprogestagents can be used in early, non-proteinuric CKD, excluding SLE and immunologic disorders, at high risk of thromboembolism and hypertension. Conversely, progestin only is generally safe and its main side effect is intramestrual spotting. Non-medicated intrauterine devices are a good alternative; their use needs to be carefully evaluated in patients at a high risk of pelvic infection, even though the degree of risk remains controversial. Barrier methods, relatively efficacious when correctly used, have few risks, and condoms are the only contraceptives that protect against sexually transmitted diseases. Surgical sterilization is rarely used also because of the risks surgery involves; it is not definitely contraindicated, and may be considered in selected cases. Emergency contraception with high-dose progestins or intrauterine devices is not contraindicated but should be avoided whenever possible, even if far preferable to abortion. Surgical abortion is invasive, but experience with medical abortion in CKD is still limited, especially in the late stages of the disease. In summary, personalized contraception is feasible, safe and should be offered to all CKD women of childbearing age who do not want to get pregnant.

Background and Aims The High-Flux (HF) dialyzer in standard hemodialysis (HD) allow the removal of a wider spectrum of uremic toxin. However, the HD can remove mostly low molecular weight solutes while the HDF can remove solutes around 15kDa, so-called Middle Molecules (MM), improving morbidity and mortality by exchange volumes >23L per session. The new medium cut-off (MCO) filter Theranova® is designed to expand the removal of toxins up to 45kDa in HD compared to HF membranes (HemoDialysis eXpanded, HDx) even with conventional blood flows and without exchange fluid infusion. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of HDx and its impact on anemia and quality of life (QoL) in haemodialysis patients. Method 11 stable HDs patients were enrolled (M/F 8/3, age 70.8±9) with Qb ≤300 ml/min in a 12 months observational case-control study. Each patient was evaluated first with HF filter (T0) and then in HDx for 12 months (T12). At T0-T6-T12 were evaluated: urea, phosphate (P), beta2-microglobulin (B2m), myoglobin (Myo), free light-chains k and λ (FLC- K and FLC- λ), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin as well. Furthermore Kt/V, dose of EPO, ERI and SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated at the beginning and end of observation. We treat HD patients accordingly to the KDIGO Guideline for Anemia in CKD. The values have been reported as mean ±SD. Results HDx (Qb = 275 ± 41 ml/min, TT 215 ± 21 m) shows a significant increase in KT/V (T0 1,33 ± 0,19; T12 1,57 ± 0,16; p = 0.001) with relevant RR of: Urea 73.5%; P 58.4%; B2m 66,1 % (p< 0.05); Myo 55,1% (p< 0.05); FLC-k 64.1 % (p< 0.05); FLC-λ 59.9% (p< 0.05). There is a significant reduction at 12months for PCR (Tab.1). HDx reduced ERI [T0 10.1 ± 11.2; T6 4.1 ± 5.3 (p <0.05); T12 6±9.8] and EPO dose [T0 8182 ± 9141; T6 3545 ± 4547 (p <0.05); T12 5273±8912], keeping the Hb unchanged. QoL is significantly improved (ISF: T0 27.3 ± 10.1; T12 40.2 ± 8.4 p = 0.0001) (ISM: T0 43.8 ± 14.2; T12 51.1 ± 9.8 p = 0.001). Conclusion HDx effectively removes uremic toxins up to 45kDa, even with Qb <300 ml/min, without reducing serum albumin and with interesting results on inflammation. Reduction of ERI and improvement of QoL are encouraging and suggest the use of HDx even in patients who cannot benefit from convective techniques because of vascular access or intolerance to high volumes of exchange.