No abstract

Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces mortality and MACE and improves safety, with reductions in major bleeding and vascular complications across the whole spectrum of patients with CAD.

Strut coverage at an average follow-up of 9 months appears to be more complete in patients allocated to BESs when compared with SESs. The impact of this difference on clinical outcome and, in particular, on the risk of late stent thrombosis is yet to be determined.

Background-Systemic levels of myeloperoxidase predict prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes and are considered a marker of plaque vulnerability. It is not known whether myeloperoxidase is associated with different coronary morphologies (ie, rupture or erosion of the culprit lesion) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results-Twenty-five consecutive patients (aged 67Ϯ11 years; 15 men [60%]; 13 [52%] with non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndrome and 12 [48%] with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) were enrolled. Optical coherence tomography classified the culprit lesion as ruptured in 18 (72%) or eroded in 7 patients (28%) and detected intraluminal thrombus in 89% of ruptured plaques and 100% of eroded plaques. Baseline systemic levels of serum myeloperoxidase were significantly higher in patients with an eroded plaque than in those with a ruptured plaque (median, 2500 ng/mL; 25th to 75th percentile, 1415 to 2920 versus median, 707 ng/mL; 25th to 75th percentile, 312 to 943; Pϭ0.001), whereas C-reactive protein levels did not differ significantly (median, 11.3 mg/L; 25th to 75th percentile, 1.3 to 28.5 versus median, 3.9 mg/L; 25th to 75th percentile, 1.3 to 17.8; Pϭ0.76, respectively). In addition, the density of myeloperoxidase-positive cells within thrombi overlying plaques in postmortem coronary specimens retrieved from sudden coronary death victims was significantly higher in lesions with erosion (nϭ11) than ruptures (nϭ11) (median, 1584; 25th to 75th percentile, 1088 to 2135 cells/mm 2 versus median, 579; 25th to 75th percentile, 442 to 760 cells/mm

No abstract

ObjectiveRisk stratification is crucial to optimise treatment strategies in patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the impact on mortality of an early assessment of cardiac biomarkers in patients with COVID-19.MethodsHumanitas Clinical and Research Hospital (Rozzano-Milan, Lombardy, Italy) is a tertiary centre that has been converted to the management of COVID-19. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 were entered in a dedicated database for cohort observational analyses. Outcomes were stratified according to elevated levels (ie, above the upper level of normal) of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or both measured within 24 hours after hospital admission. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 397 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included up to 1 April 2020. At the time of hospital admission, 208 patients (52.4%) had normal values for cardiac biomarkers, 90 (22.7%) had elevated both hs-TnI and BNP, 59 (14.9%) had elevated only BNP and 40 (10.1%) had elevated only hs-TnI. The rate of mortality was higher in patients with elevated hs-TnI (22.5%, OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.72 to 11.04), BNP (33.9%, OR 7.37, 95% CI 3.53 to 16.75) or both (55.6%, OR 18.75, 95% CI 9.32 to 37.71) as compared with those without elevated cardiac biomarkers (6.25%). A multivariate analysis identified concomitant elevation of both hs-TnI and BNP as a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 9.93).ConclusionsAn early detection of elevated hs-TnI and BNP predicts mortality in patients with COVID-19. Cardiac biomarkers should be systematically assessed in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission in order to optimise risk stratification.

The main adverse reactions to coronary stents are in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis. Along with procedural factors, individual susceptibility to these events plays an important role. In particular, inflammatory status, as assessed by C-reactive protein levels, predicts the risk of ISR after bare-metal stent implantation, although it does not predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Conversely, C-reactive protein levels fail to predict the risk of ISR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, although they appear to predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Of note, DES have abated ISR rates occurring in the classical 1-year window, but new concern is emerging regarding late restenosis and thrombosis. The pathogenesis of these late events seems to be related to delayed healing and allergic reactions to polymers, a process in which eosinophils seem to play an important role by enhancing restenosis and thrombosis. The identification of high-risk individuals based on biomarker assessment may be important for the management of patients receiving stent implantation. In this report, we review the evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the risk of ISR and stent thrombosis.

No abstract