There is a lack of clarity in the conceptualization of commitment underlying the commitment to change (CTC) procedure used by organizers of continuing education in the health professions. This article highlights the two distinct conceptualizations of commitment that have emerged in the literature outside health care education and practice. The distinction is important because different antecedent conditions produce different types and dimensions of commitment. This article goes on to explore the antecedents of behavioral and attitudinal commitment and illustrates how different types of commitment may have been produced in previous CTC studies. As a result, the article also demonstrates the need for clarity in the conceptualization of commitment, especially to guide empirical research into the nature and strength of commitment produced by the variety of CTC strategies. Such research is relevant in increasing our understanding of how and why CTCs are able to influence practice change.
Commitment-to-change (CTC) strategies used as part of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programmes have been found to influence changes in the clinical practice of health professionals. However, there is an unquestioned usage of the term 'commitment' to describe the statements made by learners specifying the changes they intend to make following CPD programmes. The Practice-based Small Group Learning (PBSGL) programme is one approach to the CPD of health professionals that includes a CTC instrument. This study reports on a pilot PBSGL programme in Scotland, which composed of mixed groups of General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses (PNs), as well as PN-only groups. Using qualitative methods, the study examines the meaning that learners ascribe to their statements of intention to introduce changes in their practice. It reveals that for some participants commitment is too strong a word to describe their intention. Nevertheless, others did feel that they were committing to the changes that they identified at PBSGL meetings. This study also explores the factors that influenced the decision of PBSGL participants to introduce practice changes, and the process of implementing change in clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.