ISPD GUIDELINES/RECOMMENDATIONSBeing aware of controversies and lack of evidence in peritoneal dialysis (PD) training, the Nursing Liaison Committee of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) has undertaken a review of PD training programs around the world in order to develop a syllabus for PD training. This syllabus has been developed to help PD nurses train patients and caregivers based on a consensus of training program reviews, utilizing current theories and principles of adult education. It is designed as a 5-day program of about 3 hours per day, but both duration and content may be adjusted based on the learner. After completion of our proposed PD training syllabus, the PD nurse will have provided education to a patient and/or caregiver such that the patient/caregiver has the required knowledge, skills and abilities to perform PD at home safely and effectively. The course may also be modified to move some topics to additional training times in the early weeks after the initial sessions. Extra time may be needed to introduce other concepts, such as the renal diet or healthy lifestyle, or to arrange meetings with other healthcare professionals. The syllabus includes a checklist for PD patient assessment and another for PD training. Further research will be needed to evaluate the effect of training using this syllabus, based on patient and nurse satisfaction as well as on infection rates and longevity of PD as a treatment. . Based on the principles of adult learning, these guidelines established a broad description of a course and a set of proposals to aid the teacher/nurse (hereafter called the PD nurse). The committee currently believes that, while the recommendations are still relevant and agree with current teaching practices in PD clinics, there is a need for a more comprehensive course to guide PD nurses.The 2006 Guidelines tried to answer some questions that arise when talking about PD training: Who should be the trainer? Who is the learner? What should be taught? Where should the training occur? What should be the duration of training? How should the patient be taught? However, many of these questions remain unanswered. A search in PubMed using the words "training," "patient education," "peritoneal dialysis," and "peritonitis" found only 17 articles published in the last 5 years, and most of these were about infection prevention. Only 4 were published in the last 12 months. Of these 1 article was a narrative review of the literature of educational interventions in PD which concluded that the topic remained an under-studied aspect of PD (2); another looked at the impact of training hours on infection and suggested a minimum of 15 hours training, to be done before catheter implantation or more than 10 days after (3), and the remaining 2 looked at preventing PD infections (4,5). One further observational study, by Firanek et al., analyzing best practices for nurse-led PD training programs for patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in the United States, stated that best practices...

There are an estimated 14,000 randomized trials published in chronic kidney disease. The most frequently reported outcomes are biochemical endpoints, rather than clinical and patient-reported outcomes including cardiovascular disease, mortality, and quality of life. While many trials have focused on optimizing kidney health, the heterogeneity and uncertain relevance of outcomes reported across trials may limit their policy and practice impact. The international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) Initiative was formed to identify core outcomes that are critically important to patients and health professionals, to be reported consistently across trials. We convened a SONG Implementation Workshop to discuss the implementation of core outcomes. Eighty-two patients/caregivers and health professionals participated in plenary and breakout discussions. In this report, we summarize the findings of the workshop in two main themes: socializing the concept of core outcomes, and demonstrating feasibility and usability. We outline implementation strategies and pathways to be established through partnership with stakeholders, which may bolster acceptance and reporting of core outcomes in trials, and encourage their use by end-users such as guideline producers and policymakers to help improve patient-important outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract