Artificial intelligence (AI) is a subset of computer science dealing with the development and training of algorithms that try to replicate human intelligence. We report a clinical overview of the basic principles of AI that are fundamental to appreciating its application to ophthalmology practice. Here, we review the most common eye diseases, focusing on some of the potential challenges and limitations emerging with the development and application of this new technology into ophthalmology.

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of visual loss in working-age adults. The purpose of this retrospective study was to perform an epidemiological analysis on DME patients treated with intravitreal drugs in a tertiary hospital. The clinical outcome, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and intravitreal drug expenses were assessed. Methods: All DME patients treated with Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, Dexamethasone implant, and Fluocinolone Acetonide implant at the Sassari University Hospital, Italy, between January 2017 and June 2020 were included. Central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured. ADRs and drug expenses were analyzed. Results: Two-hundred thirty-one DME patients (mean age: 65 years) received intravitreal agents. Mean CMT and BCVA were 380 μm and 0.5 LogMAR at baseline, 298 μm and 0.44 logMAR after one year (p = 0.04), and 295 μm and 0.4 logMAR at the end of the follow-up period. A total of 1501 intravitreal injections were given; no major ADRs were reported. Treatment cost was €915,000 (€261,429/year). Twenty non-responders to Ranibizumab or Aflibercept were switched to a Dexamethasone implant. In these patients, mean CMT and BCVA were 468 µm and 0.5 LogMar at the time of switching and 362 µm and 0.3 LogMar at the end of the follow-up (p = 0.00014 and p = 0.08, respectively). Conclusion: Results confirm that Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Dexamethasone implant are effective and safe in DME treatment. A switch to Dexamethasone implant for patients receiving Aflibercept or Ranibizumab with minimal/no clinical benefit should be considered.

The prevention and management of ocular surface infections is still one of the great challenges for ophthalmologists. The spread of antimicrobial resistance makes it necessary to use antiseptic substances with a broad antimicrobial spectrum. Polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (Polyhexanide, PHMB) is a broad-spectrum antiseptic with excellent tolerance and a low-risk profile. Its physicochemical action on the phospholipid membrane and DNA replication or repair mechanism, prevents or impedes the development of resistant bacterial strains. PHMB revealed its effective against numerous organisms like viruses, Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and fungi. Polyhexanide is commonly used as preservative in commercially available disinfecting solutions for contact lens care and in ophthalmic formulations at different concentrations ranging from 1 µg/ml to 50 µg/ml. The administration of 0.02% (200 µg/ml) PHMB is often the first-line therapy of Acanthamoeba keratitis. However, to date, only one close-out randomized controlled study tested the efficacy of 0.02% PHMB in Acanthamoeba keratitis and a phase III study is still ongoing. This paper reviews the antiseptic agent PHMB, focusing on biochemical mechanisms, safety profile and applications in ophthalmology.

The purpose of the study is to explore the morphofunctional fluctuations in eyes treated for neovascular AMD (nAMD) when treatment is switched from aflibercept or ranibizumab to brolucizumab. A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients with nAMD with type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) were included. All patients were imaged using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The OCT acquisition was performed at the following visits: (i) “T1 visit” corresponding to the last follow-up examination in which an intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab was performed before switching to brolucizumab because of the lack of improvement and (ii) “T2 visit” corresponding to the examination performed 1 month after T1, the latter visit corresponding to the day when a switch to brolucizumab injection was performed, (iii) and 1 month after the latter injection “(T3)”. The main outcome measures were: (1) central macular thickness (CMT), (2) choroidal vascularity index (CVI), (3) subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Functional outcome showed significant differences at each time. Mean ± SD BCVA was 0.43 ± 0.12 LogMAR at T1 and 0.56  ±  0.16 LogMAR at T2 (p = 0.038). A significant improvement in BCVA was displayed at T3 (0.34  ±  0.21 LogMAR) as compared with T2 (p  = 0.019). CMT analysis showed fluctuations three times. In detail, T2 displayed a thicker CMT in comparison with T1, although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Contrariwise, T3 showed a thinner CMT in comparison with T2 (p = 0.002). Analyzing CVI among the three different times, the luminal choroidal area (LCA) and total choroidal area (TCA) showed significantly different values before and after switching to brolucizumab. T2 showed a significant reduction in both vessel lumen and total area compared with T1 (p = 0.032 and p  =  0.046, respectively). Moreover, T3 showed a greater value of both LCA and TCA in comparison with T2 (p = 0.008 and p  =  0.01, respectively). CT did not show significant differences at each time (p > 0.05). Our results reported early experiences on morphofunctional fluctuations in patients with nAMD who switched to brolucizumab. The anatomical impact of brolucizumab administration appears to result in choroidal vascular enlargement, accompanied by the resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF).

Glaucoma is a multifactorial neurodegenerative illness requiring early diagnosis and strict monitoring of the disease progression. Current exams for diagnosis and prognosis are based on clinical examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, visual field tests, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). In this scenario, there is a critical unmet demand for glaucoma-related biomarkers to enhance clinical testing for early diagnosis and tracking of the disease’s development. The introduction of validated biomarkers would allow for prompt intervention in the clinic to help with prognosis prediction and treatment response monitoring. This review aims to report the latest acquisitions on biomarkers in glaucoma, from imaging analysis to genetics and metabolic markers.

Aqueous gels formulated using hydrophilic polymers (hydrogels) and those based on stimuli-responsive polymers (in situ gelling or gel-forming systems) attract increasing interest in the treatment of several eye diseases. Their chemical structure enables them to incorporate various ophthalmic medications, achieving their optimal therapeutic doses and providing more clinically relevant time courses (weeks or months as opposed to hours and days), which will inevitably reduce dose frequency, thereby improving patient compliance and clinical outcomes. Due to its chronic course, the treatment of glaucoma may benefit from applying gel technologies as drug-delivering systems and as antifibrotic treatment during and after surgery. Therefore, our purpose is to review current applications of ophthalmic gelling systems with particular emphasis on glaucoma.

Background/Purpose Inverted Inner Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap approach can fail in the treatment of Optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM). We report a surgical technique involving human amniotic membrane (hAM) patch implant to treat unresolved ODPM after inverted (ILM)-flap technique. Case Report One patient with decreased visual acuity (1 LogMar) after unsuccessful inverted ILM-flap technique to treat ODPM, underwent hAM patch implant and was evaluated. A surgical approach including a 2 mm size graft patch of hAM implantation over the optic disc pit followed by fluid–air exchange was performed. A gas endotamponade was finally used. The patient was instructed to maintain face-down position for the first three days after surgery. The hAM patch remained detectable over the pit for the entire 6-months follow-up. The ODPM gradually resolved and visual acuity partially recovered to 0.17 LogMar during follow-up. No postoperative complications or recurrence were reported. Conclusion hAM patch implant may be effective to manage ODPM after unsuccessful inverted ILM-flap.

No abstract