Methanobrevibacter smithii is the main human methanogen almost always found in the digestive tract of adults. Yet, the age at which M. smithii establishes itself as part of the developing intestinal microflora remains unknown. In order to gain insight into this, we developed a polyphasic approach, including microscopic observation by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing detection, identification and culture, to isolate and genotype M. smithii in one-day-old newborns' gastric juice specimens. In the presence of negative controls, 50/50 (100%) prospectively analysed newborn gastric juice specimens were PCR-positive for methanogens, all identified as M. smithii by sequencing. We succeeded in cultivating M. smithii in 35/50 (70%) newborn gastric juice specimens, while 15/50 specimens remained sterile. Further, M. smithii was observed by direct microscopic investigation using fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Multispacer sequence typing found one of seven different genotypes per specimen, these genotypes having all been previously described in adult human stools. Methanobrevibacter smithii is an early inhabitant of the human stomach, colonising the gastric mucosa just after birth, and the mother's gut microbiota is a probable source of colonisation.
Archaeal sequences have been detected in human colostrum and milk, but no studies have determined whether living archaea are present in either of these fluids. Methanogenic archaea are neglected since they are not detected by usual molecular and culture methods. By using improved DNA detection protocols and microbial culture techniques associated with antioxidants previously developed in our center, we investigated the presence of methanogenic archaea using culture and specific Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanobrevibacter oralis real-time PCR in human colostrum and milk. M. smithii was isolated from 3 colostrum and 5 milk (day 10) samples. M. oralis was isolated from 1 milk sample. For 2 strains, the genome was sequenced, and the rhizome was similar to that of strains previously isolated from the human mouth and gut. M. smithii was detected in the colostrum or milk of 5/13 (38%) and 37/127 (29%) mothers by culture and qPCR, respectively. The different distribution of maternal body mass index according to the detection of M. smithii suggested an association with maternal metabolic phenotype. M. oralis was not detected by molecular methods. Our results suggest that breastfeeding may contribute to the vertical transmission of these microorganisms and may be essential to seed the infant’s microbiota with these neglected critical commensals from the first hour of life.
The oral fluid microbiome comprises an important bacterial diversity, yet the presence of archaea has not been reported so far. In order to quest for the presence of methanogenic archaea (methanogens) in oral fluid, we used a polyphasic approach including PCR-sequencing detection, microscopic observation by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, isolation and culture, molecular identification and genotyping of methanogens in 200 oral fluid specimens. In the presence of negative controls, 64/200 (32%) prospectively analysed oral fluid specimens were PCR-positive for methanogens, all identified as Methanobrevibacter oralis by sequencing. Further, fluorescence in-situ hybridization detected methanogens in 19/48 (39.6%) investigated specimens; with morphology suggesting M. oralis in 10 cases and co-infecting Methanobrevibacter smithii in nine cases. M. oralis was cultured from 46/64 (71.8%) PCR-positive specimens and none of PCR-negative specimens; and one M. smithii isolate was co-cultured with M. oralis in one specimen. Multispacer Sequence Typing found one M. oralis genotype per specimen and a total of five different genotypes with 19/46 (41%) of isolates all belonging to spacer-type four. Statistical analyses showed a significant correlation between the PCR-detection of methanogens in oral fluid and tobacco smoking. These data indicate that M. oralis and M. smithii are oral fluid-borne methanogens in tobacco smokers. Both methanogens could be transmitted during intimate contacts such as mother-to-child contacts and kissing.
Background Urinary tract infections are known to be caused by bacteria, but the potential implications of archaea have never been studied in this context. Methods In two different university hospital centres we used specific laboratory methods for the detection and culture of archaeal methanogens in 383 urine specimens prospectively collected for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). Findings Methanobrevibacter smithii was detected by quantitative PCR and sequencing in 34 (9%) of the specimens collected from 34 patients. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae , Enterobacter sp., Enterococcus faecium and mixed cultures were detected along with M. smithii in eighteen, six, three, one and six urine samples, respectively. Interestingly, using our specific culture method for methanogens, we also isolated M. smithii in 31 (91%) of the 34 PCR positive urine samples. Genotyping the 31 isolates using multispacer sequence typing revealed three different genotypes which have been previously reported in intestinal microbiota. Antibiotic susceptibility testing found the 31 isolates to be in vitro susceptible to metronidazole (MIC: 1 mg/L) but resistant to fosfomycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, amoxicillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin, commonly used to treat bacterial UTI. Finally, 19 (54%) of the 34 patients in whose urine samples M. smithii was detected were diagnosed with UTIs, including cystitis, pyelonephritis and prostatitis. Interpretation Our results show that M. smithii is part of the urinary microbiota of some individuals and could play a role in community-acquired UTI in association with enteric bacteria. Fund This study was supported by IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
BackgroundArtemether–lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate–amodiaquine are first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in many endemic countries, including Mali. Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DHA–PQ) is also an alternative first-line artemisinin-based combination therapy, but only few data are available on DHA–PQ efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa. The main aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy of DHA–PQ versus AL, using the World Health Organization (WHO) 42-day in vivo protocol.MethodsThe efficacy of three-dose regimens of DHA–PQ was compared to AL combination in a randomized, comparative open label trial using the WHO 42-day follow-up protocol from 2013 to 2015 in Doneguebougou and Torodo, Mali. The primary endpoint was to access the PCR-corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Responses at day 28.ResultsA total of 317 uncomplicated malaria patients were enrolled, with 159 in DHA–PQ arm and 158 in AL arm. The parasite positivity rate decreased from 68.4% (95% CI 60.5–75.5) on day 1 to 3.8% (95% CI 1.4–8.1) on day 2 for DHA–PQ and 79.8% (95% CI 72.3–85.7) on day 1 to 9.5% (95% CI 5.4–15.2) on day 2 for AL, (p = 0.04). There was a significant difference in the uncorrected ACPR between DHA–PQ and AL, both at 28-day and 42-day follow-up with 97.4% (95% CI 93.5–99.3) in DHA–PQ vs 84.5% (95% CI 77.8–89.8) in AL (p < 0.001) and 94.2% (95% CI 89.3–97.3) in DHA–PQ vs 73.4% (95% CI 65.7–80.2) in AL, respectively (p < 0.001). After molecular correction, there was no significant difference in ACPRc between DHA–PQ and AL, both at the 28-day and 42-day follow-up with 99.4% (95% CI 96.5–100) in DHA–PQ versus 98.1% (95% CI 94.5–99.6) in AL (p = 0.3) and 99.3% (95% CI 96.5–100) in DHA–PQ vs 97.4% (95% CI 93.5–99.3) in AL (p = 0.2). There was no significant difference between DHA–PQ and AL in QTc prolongation 12.1% vs 7%, respectively (p = 0.4).ConclusionThe results showed that dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine were clinically efficacious on Plasmodium falciparum parasites in Mali.
Background The spectrum of infections caused by the emerging opportunistic pathogens methanogens which escape routine detection remains to be described. To determine the prevalence of archaemia, we searched for methanogens in the blood of febrile patients using specific tools. Methods We conducted a prospective study at Institut Hospitalier Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France, September 2018 - April 2020, enrolling 7,716 blood culture samples routinely collected in patients with fever. Blood samples were screened by specific PCR assays for the presence of methanogens. Positive samples were observed by autofluorescence and electron microscopy, analyzed by metagenomics and cultured using previously developed methods. Blood culture bottles experimentally inoculated were used as controls. The presence of methanogens in vascular and cardiac tissues was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence, fluorescent in situ hybridization and PCR-based investigations. Results PCR detection attempted in 7,716 blood samples, was negative in all 1,312 aerobic bottles and 810 bacterial culture-negative anaerobic bottles. PCRs were positive in 27/5,594 (0.5%) bacterial culture-positive anaerobic bottles that contained cultures collected from 26 patients. Sequencing confirmed Methanobrevibacter smithii associated with staphylococci in 14 patients, fermentative Enterobacteriaceae in nine patients and streptococci in three patients. Metagenomics confirmed M. smithii in five blood samples, and M. smithii was isolated via culture in broth from two samples; the genomes of these two isolates were sequenced. Blood cultures experimentally inoculated with Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus hominis yielded hydrogen, but no methane, authentifying observational data.Three patients, all diagnosed with infectious mitral endocarditis, were diagnosed by microscopy, PCR-based detections and culture: we showed M. smithii microscopically and by a specific PCR followed by sequencing method in two of three cardiovascular tissues. Conclusions Using appropriate methods of detection, M. smithii is demonstrated as causing archaemia and endocarditis in febrile patients who are coinfected by bacteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.