No abstract

Cultured tomatoes are often exposed to a combination of extreme heat and infection with Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV). This stress combination leads to intense disease symptoms and yield losses. The response of TYLCV-susceptible and resistant tomatoes to heat stress together with viral infection was compared. The plant heat-stress response was undermined in TYLCV infected plants. The decline correlated with the down-regulation of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) HSFA2 and HSFB1, and consequently, of HSF-regulated genes Hsp17, Apx1, Apx2 and Hsp90. We proposed that the weakened heat stress response was due to the decreased capacity of HSFA2 to translocate into the nuclei of infected cells. All the six TYLCV proteins were able to interact with tomato HSFA2 in vitro, moreover, coat protein developed complexes with HSFA2 in nuclei. Capturing of HSFA2 by viral proteins could suppress the transcriptional activation of heat stress response genes. Application of both heat and TYLCV stresses was accompanied by the development of intracellular large protein aggregates containing TYLCV proteins and DNA. The maintenance of cellular chaperones in the aggregated state, even after recovery from heat stress, prevents the circulation of free soluble chaperones, causing an additional decrease in stress response efficiency.

Tomato yellow leaf curl disease (TYLCD) is caused by a group of geminiviruses that belong to the Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) complex and are transmitted by the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.). The disease causes great yield losses in many countries throughout the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. In this study, the efficacy of post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) to control the disease caused by TYLCV complex was investigated. Non-coding conserved regions from the genome of TYLCV, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus-mild, tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus, tomato yellow leaf curl Malaga virus, and tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus-Spain [2] were selected and used to design a construct that can trigger broad resistance against different viruses that cause tomato yellow leaf curl disease. The silencing construct was cloned into an Agrobacterium-binary vector in sense and antisense orientation and used in transient assay to infiltrate tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana plants. A high level of resistance was obtained when plants were agro-infiltrated with an infectious clone of the Egyptian isolate of TYLCV (TYLCV-[EG]) or challenge inoculated with TYLCV, TYLCV-Mld, and TYLCSV-ES[2] using whitefly-mediated transmission 16-20 days post infiltration with the silencing construct. Results of the polymerase chain reaction showed that the resistance was effective against all three viruses. Furthermore, dot blot hybridization and PCR failed to detect viral DNA in symptomless, silenced plants. A positive correlation between resistance and the accumulation of TYLCV-specific siRNAs was observed in silenced plants. Together, these data provide compelling evidence that PTGS can be used to engineer geminivirus-resistant plants.

Gene silencing is a natural defense response of plants against invading RNA and DNA viruses. The RNA post-transcriptional silencing system has been commonly utilized to generate transgenic crop plants that are "immune" to plant virus infection. Here, we applied this approach against the devastating DNA virus tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in its host tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). To generate broad resistance to a number of different TYLCV viruses, three conserved sequences (the intergenic region [NCR], V1-V2 and C1-C2 genes) from the genome of the severe virus (TYLCV) were synthesized as a single insert and cloned into a hairpin configuration in a binary vector, which was used to transform TYLCV-susceptible tomato plants. Eight of 28 independent transgenic tomato lines exhibited immunity to TYLCV-Is and to TYLCV-Mld, but not to tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus, which shares relatively low sequence homology with the transgene. In addition, a marker-free (nptII-deleted) transgenic tomato line was generated for the first time by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation without antibiotic selection, followed by screening of 1180 regenerated shoots by whitefly-mediated TYLCV inoculation. Resistant lines showed a high level of transgene-siRNA (t-siRNA) accumulation (22% of total small RNA) with dominant sizes of 21 nt (73%) and 22 nt (22%). The t-siRNA displayed hot-spot distribution ("peaks") along the transgene, with different distribution patterns than the viral-siRNA peaks observed in TYLCV-infected tomato. A grafting experiment demonstrated the mobility of 0.04% of the t-siRNA from transgenic rootstock to non-transformed scion, even though scion resistance against TYLCV was not achieved.

No abstract

Tomato big bud was detected for the first time in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in the eastern region (Al‐Mafraq) of Jordan. Infected plants showed proliferation of lateral shoots, hypertrophic calyxes and greening of flower petals. The presence of phytoplasmas in diseased tomato plants was demonstrated using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The amplified DNAs yielded products of 1.8 kb (primer pair P1/P7) and 1.2 kb (primer pair R16F2/R2) by direct and nested‐PCR, respectively. DNA from tomato isolates T1 and T2 could not be amplified in the nested‐PCR assays when the aster yellow‐specific primer pair R16(1)F1/R1 was used, suggesting that the phytoplasma in these isolates is not genetically related to the 16SrI (aster yellows) group. After restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses, using four endonuclease enzymes (HhaI, RsaI, AluI and Bsp143I) similar patterns were formed among the digested 1.2 kb PCR products of two tomato isolates suggesting that both isolates belonged to the same phytoplasma. Compared with the RFLP profile of the reference strains, no difference in the digestion pattern was found between the tomato isolates and that of the catharanthus phyllody agent from Sudan, indicating that the phytoplasma belongs to 16SrDNA VI (clover proliferation) group.

In this study, Tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus (TYLCSV) and the strains Israel and Mild of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV-IL, TYLCV-Mld) were detected for the first time in four cucurbit crops in Jordan by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR). These viruses cause the tomato yellow leaf curl disease (TYLCD) in tomato. Cucumber, squash, melon and watermelon plants inoculated with TYLCV-IL[JO:Cuc], TYLCV-Mld, TYLCSV-IT[IT:Sar:88] and the Jordanian isolate of TYLCV (TYLCV-JV) did not show disease symptoms. However, virus-specific fragments were detected in uppermost leaves of symptomless plants by nPCR. A whitefly transmission test showed that Bemisia tabaci could transmit TYLCV-Mld from cucumber into tomato and jimsonweed plants. However, all infected tomato plants remained symptomless. In addition, results of semi-quantitative PCR (sqPCR) analysis showed that the relative amount of TYLCV-Mld DNA acquired by B. tabaci from cucumber plants was less than that acquired from tomato plants.

Environmental stresses affect agricultural production worldwide, leading to yield reductions of many crops. Drought and heat are the most serious abiotic stresses, especially in countries with hot climates. Drought, together with heat, usually stimulates plant pathogens such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, and insects. Interactions between the plant environment and pathogens modulate the plant defence responses (Prasch & Sonnewald, 2013), either weakening or enhancing them (Atkinson & Urwin, 2012).An increasing research body indicates that plant viruses modulate host responses to changes in their environment such as wounding, elevated salinity, high temperature, and atmospheric CO 2 . These changes are accompanied by alterations in the virus biology such as titre, virulence, and transmission efficiency (Bergès et al., 2020;van Munster et al., 2017).Abiotic stresses may affect the life cycle of viruses as well as the interactions between host susceptibility factors and viruses.Conversely, viruses can influence the plant response to abiotic stresses. For example, turnip mosaic virus (TuMV)-infected plants display an enhanced expression of defence genes, which is abolished in those plants exposed to abiotic stresses. Deactivation of defence responses leads to a higher susceptibility of plants to virus (Prasch & Sonnewald, 2013). Abiotic stress sensing through the Ca 2+