Objectives This systematic review aimed to identify published observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures in occupational settings and evaluate them with reference to the needs of different users. MethodsWe searched scientific databases and the internet for material from 1965 to September 2008. Methods were included if they were primarily based on the systematic observation of work, the observation target was the human body, and the method was clearly described in the literature. A systematic evaluation procedure was developed to assess concurrent and predictive validity, repeatability, and aspects related to utility. At least two evaluators independently carried out this evaluation. ResultsWe identified 30 eligible observational methods. Of these, 19 had been compared with some other method(s), varying from expert evaluation to data obtained from video recordings or through the use of technical instruments. Generally, the observations showed moderate-to-good agreement with the corresponding assessments made from video recordings; agreement was the best for large-scale body postures and work actions. Postures of wrist and hand as well as trunk rotation seemed to be more difficult to observe correctly. Intra-and inter-observer repeatability were reported for 7 and 17 methods, respectively, and were judged mostly to be moderate or good.good. . ConclusionsWith training, observers can reach consistent results on clearly visible body postures and work activities. Many observational tools exist, but none evaluated in this study appeared to be generally superior. When selecting a method, users should define their needs and assess how results will influence decision-making.
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is an important tool to estimate muscular activity at work. There is, however, a great inter-individual variation, even in carefully standardized work tasks. The sEMG signal is attenuated in the subcutaneous tissues, differently for each subject, which requires normalization. This is commonly made in relation to a reference contraction, which by itself, however, introduces a variance. A normalization method that is independent of individual motivation, motor control and pain inhibition would be desirable. The aim of the study was to explore the influence of the subcutaneous tissue thickness on sEMG amplitude. Ultrasound measurements of the muscle to skin surface distance were made bilaterally over the trapezius muscle in 12 females. Skinfold caliper measurements from these sites, as well as from four other sites, were made, body mass index (BMI) was recorded, and sEMG was recorded at maximal and submaximal contractions. The muscle-electrode distance, as measured by ultrasound, explained 33% and 31% (on the dominant and non-dominant sides respectively) of the variance of the sEMG activity at a standardized submaximal contraction (average between the sides, 46%); for maximal contractions the explained variance was 21%. Trapezius skinfold measurements showed poor correlations with sEMG. Instead, the mean of skinfold measurements from other sites explained as much as 68% (submaximal contraction). The corresponding figure for BMI was 67%. In conclusion, skinfold thickness explains a major part of the inter-individual variance in sEMG amplitude, and normalization to this measure is a possibility worth further evaluation.
There is a need for objective and quantitative methods for measuring posture and movement, so that, for instance, exposure-response relationships for work-related musculoskeletal disorders can be established. Inclinometry data have been obtained from triaxial accelerometers based on uniaxial solid-state accelerometers used in conjunction with a computer program to perform co-ordinate transformations. The transducer can be mounted in an arbitrary orientation on a body segment, since if two reference positions are recorded, the co-ordinate system of the transducer can be transformed to that of the body segment. The angular error of the system is small (1.3 degrees), the reproducibility is high (0.2 degrees), and the inherent angular noise is small (0.04 degrees) and independent of the orientation of the device. Under quasi-static conditions, the angular velocities can be derived from the inclinometry data. The angular and the angular-velocity errors can be approximated using the relative deviation of the acceleration magnitude from gravitation. For applications involving a high degree of movement, the accelerometer data are still valid, although they cannot be interpreted as inclination. Used in combination with the computer program, the transducer can be used to measure posture and movement under static and quasi-static conditions, which occur in most areas of occupational work. It is shown that spherical co-ordinates can be used to present the inclinometry data.
In identical work tasks, females showed substantially higher muscular activity in relation to capacity, and higher prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremity, than did males.
This paper combines epidemiological data on musculoskeletal morbidity in 40 female and 15 male occupational groups (questionnaire data 3720 females, 1241 males, physical examination data 1762 females, 915 males) in order to calculate risk for neck and upper limb disorders in repetitive/constrained vs. varied/mobile work and further to compare prevalence among office, industrial and non-office/non-industrial settings, as well as among jobs within these. Further, the paper aims to compare the risk of musculoskeletal disorders from repetitive/constrained work between females and males. Prevalence ratios (PR) for repetitive/constrained vs. varied/mobile work were in neck/shoulders: 12-month complaints females 1.2, males 1.1, diagnoses at the physical examination 2.3 and 2.3. In elbows/hands PRs for complaints were 1.7 and 1.6, for diagnoses 3.0 and 3.4. Tension neck syndrome, cervicalgia, shoulder tendonitis, acromioclavicular syndrome, medial epicondylitis and carpal tunnel syndrome showed PRs > 2. In neck/shoulders PRs were similar across office, industrial and non-office/non-industrial settings, in elbows/hands, especially among males, somewhat higher in industrial work. There was a heterogeneity within the different settings (estimated by bootstrapping), indicating higher PRs for some groups. As in most studies, musculoskeletal disorders were more prevalent among females than among males. Interestingly, though, the PRs for repetitive/constrained work vs. varied/mobile were for most measures approximately the same for both genders. In conclusion, repetitive/constrained work showed elevated risks when compared to varied/mobile work in all settings. Females and males showed similar risk elevations. This article enables comparison of risk of musculoskeletal disorders among many different occupations in industrial, office and other settings, when using standardised case definitions. It confirms that repetitive/constrained work is harmful not only in industrial but also in office and non-office/non-industrial settings. The reported data can be used for comparison with future studies.
Objective-The aim was to study the association between personal factors and physical and psychosocial work environment factors and disorders of the neck or upper limbs among women in the fish processing industry. Methods-A cross sectional study was performed on 206 women in the fish processing industry and 208 control women. Several physical and psychosocial work environment factors were evaluated. Subjective complaints about the neck or upper limbs were assessed by questionnaire and by a clinical examination. Results-The study showed a high prevalence (35%) of diagnoses in the neck or shoulders of the exposed women. All prevalence odds ratios (POR's) were substantially higher in young women. There was a pronounced dose-response relation between disorders of the neck or shoulders and duration of employment for women < 45 years old. When studying 322 former workers, the proportion who claimed musculoskeletal complaints as the reason for leaving was highest among the older women. Muscular tension, stress or worry, work strain, and the largest fraction of the work time spent with highly repetitive work tasks were clearly associated with disorders of the neck or shoulders. The measurements of the wrist movements also showed that the work was performed almost without any pauses and that the median flexion and extension velocity was high (410/s). The results of observation showed good agreement with the measurements of wrist motion. Conclusion-Work in the fish processing industry is a risk factor for disorders of the neck and upper limbs. Due to the homogenity of the physical work load in the exposed group, we could not show any associations between the objective measurements and disorders. In cross sectional studies the risk may be underestimated due to a healthy worker effect.( show that awkward postures, work at shoulder level, and repetitive hand and wrist movements contribute to the development of disorders of the neck and upper limbs.To effectively prevent these problems, there is a need for precise and quantitative knowledge about the relation between exposure and effect. In most epidemiological studies of disorders of the neck and upper limbs, information about exposure is too limited or imprecise.7 Moreover, the exposure often involves several dimensions, and therefore it is necessary to use several measurements of exposure in a particular occupational setting.8' One aim of our study was to apply different measurements of exposure and study their relations with the effect.To obtain trustworthy risk estimates, it is of great importance to use reliable methods for registration of disease. Most often, neck and upper limb disorders are assessed, for epidemiologic purposes, through a questionnaire.35 Although valuable in many cases, this method gives imprecise information about the character of the complaint. The questionnaire approach may also imply an underestimation of the true size of the problem."' Thus, in our study thorough and standardized physical examinations were performed for measuring the effe...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.