Increased sympathetic activity contributes to hypertension in patients with chronic renal disease. ACE inhibition controls hypertension and decreases sympathetic hyperactivity.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality importantly influence live expectancy of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD). Traditional risk factors are usually present, but several other factors have recently been identified. There is now evidence that CKD is often characterized by an activated sympathetic nervous system. This may contribute to the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, but it may also adversely affect prognosis independently of its effect on blood pressure. The purpose of this review is to summarize available knowledge on the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, its clinical relevance, and the consequences of this knowledge for the choice of treatment.

Abstract. The hypothesis that in hypertensive patients with renal parenchymal disease sympathetic activity is "inappropriately" elevated and that this overactivity is a feature of renal disease and not of a reduced number of nephrons per se is addressed. Fifty seven patients with renal disease (various causes, no diabetes, all on antihypertensive medication) were studied, age range 18 to 62, creatinine clearance 10 to 114 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Antihypertensives were stopped, but diuretics were allowed, to prevent overhydration. Matched control subjects were also studied. The effect of changes in fluid status was examined in seven patients while on and after stopping diuretics and in eight control subjects while on lowand high-sodium diet. Seven kidney donors were studied before and after unilateral nephrectomy. Sympathetic activity was quantified as muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in the peroneal nerve. Mean arterial pressure, MSNA, and plasma renin activity were higher in patients than in control subjects, respectively (115 Ϯ 12 and 88 Ϯ 11 mmHg, 31 Ϯ 15 and 18 Ϯ 10 bursts/min, and 500 [20 to 6940] and 220 [40 to 980] fmol/L per s; P Ͻ 0.01 for all items). Extracellular fluid volume (bromide distribution) did not differ. Seven patients were studied again after stopping diuretics. MSNA decreased from 34 Ϯ 18 to 19 Ϯ 18 bursts/min (P Ͻ 0.01). Eight healthy subjects were studied during low-and high-sodium diet. MSNA was 26 Ϯ 12 and 13 Ϯ 7 bursts/min (P Ͻ 0.01). The curves relating extracellular fluid volume to MSNA were parallel in the two groups but shifted to a higher level of MSNA in the patients. In the kidney donors, creatinine clearance reduced by 25%, but MSNA was identical before and after donation. It is concluded that in hypertensive patients with renal parenchymal disease, sympathetic activity is inappropriately high for the volume status and that reduction of nephron number in itself does not influence sympathetic activity.

Until recently, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses with oral corticosteroids were regarded standard therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). Azathioprine, a less toxic alternative, was never proven to be inferior. In the first Dutch lupus nephritis study (enrollment between 1995 and 2001), we randomized 87 proliferative LN patients to either cyclophosphamide pulses (750 mg/m(2), 13 pulses in 2 years) combined with oral prednisone (CY) or to azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day in 2 years) combined with intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone (3 x 3 pulses of 1000 mg) and oral prednisone (AZA). After a median follow-up of 5.7 years (interquartile range 4.1-7.2 years), doubling of serum creatinine was more frequent in the AZA group, although not statistically significant (relative risk (RR): 4.1, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.8-20.4). Relapses occurred more often in the AZA group (RR: 8.8, 95% CI: 1.5-31.8). Creatinine and proteinuria at last visit did not differ between the two treatment arms. Moreover, 88.4% of the patients in the AZA arm were still free of cyclophosphamide treatment. During the first 2 years, the frequency of remission was not different, but infections, especially herpes zoster virus infections (HZV) were more frequent in the AZA group. Parameters for ovarian function did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, in this open-label randomized controlled trial, cyclophosphamide was superior to azathioprine with regard to renal relapses and HZV. At last follow-up, there were no differences in serum creatinine or proteinuria between the two groups. However, since our study lacked sufficient power, longer follow-up is needed to reveal putative differences.

Abstract. The aim of this study was to compare the effects on BP and sympathetic activity of chronic treatment with an angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an AngII receptor blocker in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). In ten stable hypertensive CRF patients (creatinine clearance, 46 Ϯ 17 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), plasma renin activity (PRA), baroreceptor sensitivity, and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs (except diuretics) after 6 wk of enalapril (10 mg orally) and after 6 wk of losartan (100 mg orally). The order of the three phases was randomized. Normovolemia was controlled with diuretics and confirmed with extracellular fluid volume measurements throughout the study. Both enalapril and losartan reduced MSNA (from 33 Ϯ 10 to 27 Ϯ 13 and 27 Ϯ 13 bursts/min, respectively; P Ͻ 0.05) and average 24-h BP (from 141 Ϯ 8/93 Ϯ 8 to 124 Ϯ 9/79 Ϯ 8 and 127 Ϯ 8/81 Ϯ 9 mmHg; P Ͻ 0.01). PRA was not different during the treatments. The change in BP and the change in MSNA during the treatments were correlated (r ϭ 0.70 and r ϭ 0.63, respectively; both P Ͻ 0.05). Baroreceptor sensitivity was not affected by the treatments. This is the first study to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and AngII blockade on MSNA. In hypertensive CRF patients, enalapril and losartan equally reduced BP and MSNA. Differences in modes of action of the two drugs did not result in differences in effects on MSNA, supporting the view that AngII-mediated mechanisms contribute importantly in the pathogenesis of sympathetic hyperactivity in these patients.Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic renal failure (CRF) is caused by mechanisms arising in the failing kidneys (1). The renin system is often activated in hypertensive patients with CRF. There is clear evidence that high circulating angiotensin II (AngII) levels can stimulate central sympathetic outflow by a direct effect on the vasomotor center in the brain stem, which in humans can be quantified as increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) (2). We showed that MSNA is increased in patients with CRF and that this hyperactivity was reduced by chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition (3). These findings support the idea that AngII is involved in the pathogenesis of the sympathetic hyperactivity. However, ACE inhibition did not completely normalize the MSNA in these patients. There is increasing evidence that sympathetic hyperactivity contributes to the cardiovascular risk profile, not only by its effect on BP, but also independent of this effect (4).The hypothesis in the present study was that AngII receptor blockade in an equally effective antihypertensive regimen more effectively reduces the sympathetic hyperactivity than ACE inhibition. AngII receptor blockers are well accepted as antihypertensive agents in patients with CRF (5-7). Their BP lowering effect is comparable to that of ACE inhibitors (7,8). However, although both classes of drugs primarily interf...

Treatment goals for patients with CKD are often unrealized for many reasons, but support by nurse practitioners may improve risk factor levels in these patients. Here, we analyzed renal endpoints of the Multifactorial Approach and Superior Treatment Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse Practitioners (MASTERPLAN) study after extended follow-up to determine whether strict implementation of current CKD guidelines through the aid of nurse practitioners improves renal outcome. In total, 788 patients with moderate to severe CKD were randomized to receive nurse practitioner support added to physician care (intervention group) or physician care alone (control group). Median follow-up was 5.7 years. Renal outcome was a secondary endpoint of the MASTERPLAN study. We used a composite renal endpoint of death, ESRD, and 50% increase in serum creatinine. Event rates were compared with adjustment for baseline serum creatinine concentration and changes in estimated GFR were determined. During the randomized phase, there were small but significant differences between the groups in BP, proteinuria, LDL cholesterol, and use of aspirin, statins, active vitamin D, and antihypertensive medications, in favor of the intervention group. The intervention reduced the incidence of the composite renal endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.98; P=0.03). In the intervention group, the decrease in estimated GFR was 0.45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year less than in the control group (P=0.01). In conclusion, additional support by nurse practitioners attenuated the decline of kidney function and improved renal outcome in patients with CKD.

Strict implementation of guidelines directed at multiple targets reduces vascular risk in diabetic patients. Whether this also applies to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. To evaluate this, the MASTERPLAN Study randomized 788 patients with CKD (estimated GFR 20-70 ml/min) to receive additional intensive nurse practitioner support (the intervention group) or nephrologist care (the control group). The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. During a mean follow-up of 4.62 years, modest but significant decreases were found for blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, anemia, proteinuria along with the increased use of active vitamin D or analogs, aspirin and statins in the intervention group compared to the controls. No differences were found in the rate of smoking cessation, weight reduction, sodium excretion, physical activity, or glycemic control. Intensive control did not reduce the rate of the composite end point (21.3/1000 person-years in the intervention group compared to 23.8/1000 person-years in the controls (hazard ratio 0.90)). No differences were found in the secondary outcomes of vascular interventions, all-cause mortality or end-stage renal disease. Thus, the addition of intensive support by nurse practitioner care in patients with CKD improved some risk factor levels, but did not significantly reduce the rate of the primary or secondary end points.

ABSTRACT. Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups.