BackgroundChronic fluid overload is associated with higher mortality in dialysis patients; however, the link with cardiovascular morbidity has not formally been established and may be influenced by subclinical inflammation. We hypothesized that a relationship exists between fluid overload and [i] cardiovascular laboratory parameter as well as between fluid overload and [ii] inflammatory laboratory parameters. In addition, we aimed to confirm whether volume status correlates with nutritional status.MethodsWe recorded baseline characteristics of 244 hemodialysis patients at three hemodialysis facilities in Vienna (Austria) and determined associations with volume measurements using the body composition monitor (Fresenius/Germany). In one facility comprising 126 patients, we further analyzed cardiovascular, inflammatory and nutritional parameters.ResultsWe detected predialysis fluid overload (FO) in 39% of all patients (n = 95) with FO defined as ≥15% of extracellular water (ECW). In this subgroup, the absolute FO was 4.4 +/-1.5 L or 22.9 ± 4.8% of ECW. A sub-analysis of patients from one center showed that FO was negatively associated with body mass index (r = -0.371; p = <0.001), while serum albumin was significantly lower in fluid overloaded patients (p = 0.001). FO was positively associated with D-Dimer (r = 0.316; p = 0.001), troponin T (r = 0.325; p < 0.001), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.436; p < 0.001), but not with investigated inflammatory parameters.ConclusionsFluid overload in HD patients was found to be lower in patients with high body mass index, indicating that dry weight was inadequately prescribed and/or difficult to achieve in overweight patients. The association with parameters of cardiovascular compromise and/or damage suggests that fluid overload is a biomarker for cardiovascular risk. Future studies should determine if this applies to patients prior to end-stage renal disease.

BackgroundBecause chronic fluid volume overload is associated with higher mortality, we tested whether blood-volume monitored regulation of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity (UCR) and/or regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) would facilitate dry weight reduction, in comparison to conventional dialysis (CONV).MethodsWe carried out a multicenter, 4-week, randomized controlled trial in hemodialysis patients ≥15% above normal extracellular fluid volume (ECV), per bioimpedance spectroscopy, who were randomized 1:1:1. Applying UCR (Nikkiso), UTR (Fresenius) and CONV, initial dry weight was reduced rapidly to target. Dry weight reduction was attenuated and eventually stopped at the occurrence of dialysis complications. The primary outcome was defined as intra- and postdialytic complications. Secondary outcomes were magnitudes of dry weight and blood pressure reduction.ResultsOf 244 patients assessed, N = 95 had volume overload ≥15% above normal ECV. Fifty patients received the allocated interventions (N = 16 UCR, N = 18 UTR, N = 16 CONV) and completed the trial. The rate of complications was significantly lower in UTR compared to CONV (21 ± 21% vs 34 ± 20%, p = 0.022), and also compared to UCR (vs 39 ± 27%, p = 0.028), but not statistically different between UCR and CONV (p = 0.93). Dry weight reduction was significantly higher in UTR compared to UCR (5.0 ± 3.4% vs 2.0 ± 2.7% body weight, p = 0.013), but not compared to CONV (vs 3.9 ± 2.1% body weight, p = 0.31). Systolic blood pressure reduction throughout the intervention phase was 17 ± 22 mmHg overall, but not significantly different between the three groups. Average maximum ultrafiltration rates were significantly higher in UTR than in UCR and CONV, at statistically similar dialysis times. Retrospective examination of randomly selected hemodialysis sessions in the UCR group identified technical mistakes in 36% of the dialysis sessions, despite considerable training efforts.ConclusionsEven in patients with volume overload, fluid removal was challenging. Despite the relative advantage of UTR, which must be interpreted with caution in view of the poor technical execution of UCR, this study renders clear that fluid removal must not be reinforced rapidly. Apprehension of this obstacle is imperative for future clinical and academic endeavors aimed at improving dialysis outcomes by correcting volume status.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01416753), trial registration date: August 12, 2011.

BackgroundData generated with the body composition monitor (BCM, Fresenius) show, based on bioimpedance technology, that chronic fluid overload in hemodialysis patients is associated with poor survival. However, removing excess fluid by lowering dry weight can be accompanied by intradialytic and postdialytic complications. Here, we aim at testing the hypothesis that, in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity (UCR) and/or regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) will decrease complications when ultrafiltration volumes are systematically increased in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients.Methods/designBCM measurements yield results on fluid overload (in liters), relative to extracellular water (ECW). In this prospective, multicenter, triple-arm, parallel-group, crossover, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we use BCM measurements, routinely introduced in our three maintenance hemodialysis centers shortly prior to the start of the study, to recruit sixty hemodialysis patients with fluid overload (defined as ≥15% ECW). Patients are randomized 1:1:1 into UCR, UTR and conventional hemodialysis groups. BCM-determined, ‘final’ dry weight is set to normohydration weight −7% of ECW postdialysis, and reached by reducing the previous dry weight, in steps of 0.1 kg per 10 kg body weight, during 12 hemodialysis sessions (one study phase). In case of intradialytic complications, dry weight reduction is decreased, according to a prespecified algorithm. A comparison of intra- and post-dialytic complications among study groups constitutes the primary endpoint. In addition, we will assess relative weight reduction, changes in residual renal function, quality of life measures, and predialysis levels of various laboratory parameters including C-reactive protein, troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, before and after the first study phase (secondary outcome parameters).DiscussionPatients are not requested to revert to their initial degree of fluid overload after each study phase. Therefore, the crossover design of the present study merely serves the purpose of secondary endpoint evaluation, for example to determine patient choice of treatment modality. Previous studies on blood volume monitoring have yielded inconsistent results. Since we include only patients with BCM-determined fluid overload, we expect a benefit for all study participants, due to strict fluid management, which decreases the mortality risk of hemodialysis patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01416753

Abstract. Homocysteine is associated with atherosclerosis and enhanced cardiovascular risk. In previous studies, treatment with folic acid up to 15 mg/d failed to correct hyperhomocysteinemia in the majority of end-stage renal disease patients. A dose of 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day was compared with 15 mg/d in an attempt to normalize hyperhomocysteinemia in 150 hemodialysis patients. In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 144 patients completed the 4-wk treatment period and 121 patients completed the 6-mo follow-up. Total homocysteine plasma levels were reduced by 32.1% (15 mg/d), 29.9% (30 mg/d), or 37.8% (60 mg/d) with no significant differences found between the three treatment groups. Baseline total homocysteine plasma concentration was an independent predictor of the response to folic acid therapy (P= 0.0001), whereas the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms (MTHFR677C → T and 1298A → C) had no influence. Nevertheless, patients with theMTHFR677TT genotype more frequently attained normal total homocysteine plasma levels than patients with the CC or CT genotype (P= 0.025). In response to 60 mg of folic acid per day, TT genotype patients had lower folate plasma levels compared to CC or CT genotype patients (P= 0.016). After completion of the 4-wk treatment period with 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day, there was a marked rebound of total homocysteine plasma levels at the end of the follow-up in patients with theMTHFR677TT genotype, which even exceeded baseline values in several patients (P= 0.0001). This study clearly demonstrates that doses of 30 or 60 mg of folic acid per day are not more effective than 15 mg/d in reducing hyperhomocysteinemia in regular hemodialysis patients. Patients with theMTHFR677TT genotype are more likely to realize normal total homocysteine plasma levels. Folic acid at 30 or 60 mg/d but not 15 mg/d results in a rebound of total homocysteine plasma concentrations when treatment is stopped.

In older textbooks the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with liver cirrhosis and/or ascites was contraindicated. Only a small number of papers have focused on this problem and they mainly consist of case reports and retrospective studies of small numbers of patients. In addition, most nephrologists' experience of performing PD in patients with liver diseases is rather limited. Nevertheless, for these patients PD offers a wide range of advantages, such as a simplified ascites management, since repeated abdominal punctures become unnecessary. Furthermore, because of continuous peritoneal ultrafiltration, hemodynamic tolerance during PD is significantly better than in hemodialysis and results in a markedly lower frequency of hypotensive episodes. The risk of nosocomial infection with hepatitis B or C viruses can also be reduced by treating these patients with home PD. Although some authors suggest that PD patients with liver cirrhosis have an especially increased risk of Gram-negative peritonitis, currently available data show controversial results. There is also little information in the literature on the impact of increased peritoneal protein loss on malnutrition and outcome of these patients. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that protein loss into the peritoneal cavity in PD patients with liver cirrhosis is high only initially, stabilizing at a lower level in the further course of treatment. In conclusion, in patients with end-stage renal disease suffering from liver cirrhosis and/or ascites, PD can be considered as a good or adequate treatment option.