Changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+];) have been proposed to be involved in signal transduction pathways in response to a number of stimuli, including gravity and touch. The current hypothesis proposes that the development of gravitropic bending is correlated with a redistribution of [Caz+li in gravistimulated roots.However, no study has demonstrated clearly the development of an asymmetry of this ion during root curvature. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying the temporal and spatial changes i n [Ca2+]; in roots of living Arabidopsis seedlings using ultraviolet-confocal Ca2+-ratio imaging and vertical stage fluorescence microscopy to visualize root [Ca2+li. We observed no changes i n [Ca*+], associated with the graviresponse whether monitored at the whole organ leve1 or i n individual cells in different regions of the root for up to 12 h after gravistimulation. However, touch stimulation led to transient increases in [Ca"]; in all cell types monitored. The increases induced in the cap cells were larger and longer-lived than i n cells i n the meristematic or elongation zone. One millimolar La3+ and 1 O0 WM verapamil did not prevent these responses, whereas 5 mM ECTA or 50 WM ruthenium red inhibited the transients, indicating an intracellular origin of the CaZ+ increase. These results suggest that, although touch responses of roots may be mediated through a Ca2+-dependent pathway, the gravitropic response is not associated with detectable changes i n [Ca2+],.When positioned horizontally a root responds by curving downward toward the gravity vector. The positive gravitropic response of roots depends on a series of events: gravity perception, translocation of the gravity stimulus to the site of the response, and the tropic-growth response. The latter is characterized by asymmetric growth across the elongation zone, with reduced growth along the lower side compared with the upper side (Ishikawa et al., 1991). The gravity-sensing cells in the root are thought to be the cells of the starch-containing columella in the cap. A widely used model for root gravitropism is that sedimentation of amyloplasts in the columella (Sack, 1991) leads to asym-

SummaryThe actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in regulating plant gravitropism. However, its precise role in this process remains uncertain. We have shown previously that disruption of the actin cytoskeleton with Latrunculin B (Lat B) strongly promoted gravitropism in maize roots. These effects were most evident on a clinostat as curvature that would exceed 908 despite short periods of horizontal stimulation. To probe further the cellular mechanisms underlying these enhanced gravity responses, we extended our studies to roots of Arabidopsis. Similar to our observations in other plant species, Lat B enhanced the response of Arabidopsis roots to gravity. Lat B (100 nM) and a stimulation time of 5±10 min were suf®cient to induce enhanced bending responses during clinorotation. Lat B (100 nM) disrupted the ®ne actin ®lament network in different regions of the root and altered the dynamics of amyloplasts in the columella but did not inhibit the gravity-induced alkalinization of the columella cytoplasm. However, the duration of the alkalinization response during continuous gravistimulation was extended in Lat B-treated roots. Indirect visualization of auxin redistribution using the DR5:b-glucuronidase (DR5:GUS) auxin-responsive reporter showed that the enhanced curvature of Lat B-treated roots during clinorotation was accompanied by a persistent lateral auxin gradient. Blocking the gravity-induced alkalinization of the columella cytoplasm with caged protons reduced Lat B-induced curvature and the development of the lateral auxin gradient. Our data indicate that the actin cytoskeleton is unnecessary for the initial perception of gravity but likely acts to downregulate gravitropism by continuously resetting the gravitropic-signaling system.

No abstract

The GRAVI-1 experiment was brought on board the International Space Station by Discovery (December 2006) and carried out in January 2007 in the European Modular Cultivation System facility. For the first run of this experiment, lentil seedlings were hydrated and grown in microgravity for 15 h and then subjected for 13 h 40 min to centrifugal accelerations ranging from 0.29 x 10(-2) g to 0.99 x 10(-2) g. During the second run, seedlings were grown either for 30 h 30 min in microgravity (this sample was the control) or for 21 h 30 min and then subjected to centrifugal accelerations ranging from 1.2 x 10(-2) g to 2.0 x 10(-2) g for 9 h. In both cases, root orientation and root curvature were followed by time-lapse photography. Still images were downlinked in near real time to ground Norwegian User Support and Operations Center during the experiment. The position of the root tip and the root curvature were analyzed as a function of time. It has been shown that in microgravity, the embryonic root curved strongly away from the cotyledons (automorphogenesis) and then straightened out slowly from 17 to 30 h following hydration (autotropism). Because of the autotropic straightening of roots in microgravity, their tip was oriented at an angle close to the optimal angle of curvature (120 degrees -135 degrees ) for a period of 2 h during centrifugation. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that lentil roots grown in microgravity before stimulation were more sensitive than roots grown in 1 g. In these conditions, the threshold acceleration perceived by these organs was found to be between 0 and 2.0 x 10(-3) g and estimated punctually at 1.4 x 10(-5) g by using the hyperbolic model for fitting the experimental data and by assuming that autotropism had no or little impact on the gravitropic response. Gravisensing by statoliths should be possible at such a low level of acceleration because the actomyosin system could provide the necessary work to overcome the activation energy for gravisensing.

The dose-response curve of the gravitropic reaction is often used to evaluate the gravisensing of plant organs. It has been proposed (Larsen 1957) that the response (curvature) varies linearly as a function of the logarithm of the dose of gravistimulus. As this model fitted correctly most of the data obtained in the literature, the presentation time (tp, minimal duration of stimulation in the gravitational field to induce a response) or the presentation dose (dp, minimal quantity in g.s of stimulation to induce a response) were estimated by extrapolating down to zero curvature the straight line representing the response as a function of the logarithm of the stimulus. This method was preferred to a direct measurement of dp or tp with minute stimulations, since very slight gravitropic response cannot be distinguished from the background oscillations of the extremity of the organs. In the present review, it is shown that generally the logarithmic model (L) does not fit the experimental data published in the literature as well as the hyperbolic model (H). The H model in its simplest form is related to a response in which a ligand-receptor system is the limiting phase in the cascade of events leading to the response (Weyers et al. 1987). However, it is demonstrated that the differential growth, responsible for the curvature (and the angle of curvature), would vary as a hyperbolic function of the dose of stimulation, even if several steps involving ligand-receptor systems are responsible for the gravitropic curvature. In the H model, there is theoretically no presentation time (or presentation dose) since the curve passes through the origin. The value of the derivative of the H function equals a/b and represents the slope of the cune at the origin. It could be therefore used to estimate gravisensitivity. This provides a measurement of graviresponsiveness for threshold doses of stimulation. These results imply that the presentation time (or presentation dose) derived from the L model cannot be used anymore as an estimate of gravisensitivity. On the contrary, the perception time (minimal duration of a repeated stimulation which induces a response), which is less than 1 s, should be related to the perception of gravity. The consequences of these results on the mode of action and the nature of graviperception are discussed.