No abstract

The GRAVI-1 experiment was brought on board the International Space Station by Discovery (December 2006) and carried out in January 2007 in the European Modular Cultivation System facility. For the first run of this experiment, lentil seedlings were hydrated and grown in microgravity for 15 h and then subjected for 13 h 40 min to centrifugal accelerations ranging from 0.29 x 10(-2) g to 0.99 x 10(-2) g. During the second run, seedlings were grown either for 30 h 30 min in microgravity (this sample was the control) or for 21 h 30 min and then subjected to centrifugal accelerations ranging from 1.2 x 10(-2) g to 2.0 x 10(-2) g for 9 h. In both cases, root orientation and root curvature were followed by time-lapse photography. Still images were downlinked in near real time to ground Norwegian User Support and Operations Center during the experiment. The position of the root tip and the root curvature were analyzed as a function of time. It has been shown that in microgravity, the embryonic root curved strongly away from the cotyledons (automorphogenesis) and then straightened out slowly from 17 to 30 h following hydration (autotropism). Because of the autotropic straightening of roots in microgravity, their tip was oriented at an angle close to the optimal angle of curvature (120 degrees -135 degrees ) for a period of 2 h during centrifugation. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that lentil roots grown in microgravity before stimulation were more sensitive than roots grown in 1 g. In these conditions, the threshold acceleration perceived by these organs was found to be between 0 and 2.0 x 10(-3) g and estimated punctually at 1.4 x 10(-5) g by using the hyperbolic model for fitting the experimental data and by assuming that autotropism had no or little impact on the gravitropic response. Gravisensing by statoliths should be possible at such a low level of acceleration because the actomyosin system could provide the necessary work to overcome the activation energy for gravisensing.

The dose-response curve of the gravitropic reaction is often used to evaluate the gravisensing of plant organs. It has been proposed (Larsen 1957) that the response (curvature) varies linearly as a function of the logarithm of the dose of gravistimulus. As this model fitted correctly most of the data obtained in the literature, the presentation time (tp, minimal duration of stimulation in the gravitational field to induce a response) or the presentation dose (dp, minimal quantity in g.s of stimulation to induce a response) were estimated by extrapolating down to zero curvature the straight line representing the response as a function of the logarithm of the stimulus. This method was preferred to a direct measurement of dp or tp with minute stimulations, since very slight gravitropic response cannot be distinguished from the background oscillations of the extremity of the organs. In the present review, it is shown that generally the logarithmic model (L) does not fit the experimental data published in the literature as well as the hyperbolic model (H). The H model in its simplest form is related to a response in which a ligand-receptor system is the limiting phase in the cascade of events leading to the response (Weyers et al. 1987). However, it is demonstrated that the differential growth, responsible for the curvature (and the angle of curvature), would vary as a hyperbolic function of the dose of stimulation, even if several steps involving ligand-receptor systems are responsible for the gravitropic curvature. In the H model, there is theoretically no presentation time (or presentation dose) since the curve passes through the origin. The value of the derivative of the H function equals a/b and represents the slope of the cune at the origin. It could be therefore used to estimate gravisensitivity. This provides a measurement of graviresponsiveness for threshold doses of stimulation. These results imply that the presentation time (or presentation dose) derived from the L model cannot be used anymore as an estimate of gravisensitivity. On the contrary, the perception time (minimal duration of a repeated stimulation which induces a response), which is less than 1 s, should be related to the perception of gravity. The consequences of these results on the mode of action and the nature of graviperception are discussed.

The kinetics of the movement of statoliths in gravity-perceiving root cap cells of Lens culinaris L. and the force responsible for it have been analysed under 1 g and under microgravity conditions (S/MM-03 mission of Spacehab 1996). At the beginning of the experiment in space, the amyloplasts were grouped at the distal pole of the statocytes by a root-tip-directed 1-g centrifugal acceleration. The seedlings were then placed in microgravity for increasing periods of time (13, 29, 46 or 122 min) and chemically fixed. During the first 29 min of microgravity there were local displacements (mean velocity: 0.154 microm min(-1)) of some amyloplasts (first at the front of the group and then at the rear). Nevertheless, the group of amyloplasts tended to reconstitute. After 122 min in microgravity the bulk of amyloplasts had almost reached the proximal pole where further movement was blocked by the nucleus. After a longer period in microgravity (4 h; experiment carried out 1994 during the IML 2 mission) the statoliths reached a stable position due to the fact that they were stopped by the nucleus. The position was similar to that observed in roots grown continuously in microgravity. Treatment with cytochalasin D (CD) did not stop the movement of the amyloplasts but slowed down the velocity of their displacement (0.019 microm min(-1)). Initial movement patterns were the same as in control roots in water. Comparisons of mean velocities of amyloplast movements in roots in space and in inverted roots on earth showed that the force responsible for the movement in microgravity (Fc) was about 86% less (Fc = 0.016 pN) than the gravity force (Fg = 0.11 pN). Treatment with CD reduced Fc by two-thirds. The apparent viscosity of the statocyte cytoplasm was found to be 1 Pa s or 3.3 Pa s for control roots or CD treated roots, respectively. Brownian motion or elastic forces due to endoplasmic reticulum membranes do not cause the movement of the amyloplasts in microgravity. It is concluded that the force transporting the statoliths is caused by the actomyosin system.

Space experiments have offered a unique opportunity to analyse the mechanism of gravisensing in plant roots. It has been shown that the strict structural polarity of statocytes observed on the ground is perturbed in microgravity: the amyloplasts move towards the proximal half of the cell and, at least in some cases, the nucleus becomes located further away from the (proximal) plasma membrane. It has thus been demonstrated that the amyloplasts do not move freely in the cytoplasm. Experiments using cytochalasin B (or D) have indicated that these organelles are attached to the actin network, probably by motor proteins. These findings have led to a new hypothesis on gravisensing the basis of which is that the tension in the actin filaments resulting from interaction with the statoliths would be transmitted to stretch-activated ion channels located in the plasma membrane (Sievers et al., 1991, In: Lloyd (ed) The cytoskeletal basis of plant growth and form, Academic Press, London New York, pp 169-182). Recently, it has been shown that the sensitivity of roots grown under 1 g conditions in orbit is less than that of roots grown in microgravity or under simulated weightlessness on clinostats. Since the location of the amyloplasts in microgravity is different from that in 1 g, the greater sensitivity observed could be due to different tensions in the actin network.