http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422/-/DC1.

Sequential CRT provided most patients with a modest increase in stroke volume above that achieved during simultaneous CRT. Patients receiving sequential CRT had improved exercise capacity, but no change in functional status or QoL.

IMPORTANCE Unruptured intracranial aneurysms not undergoing preventive endovascular or neurosurgical treatment are often monitored radiologically to detect aneurysm growth, which is associated with an increase in risk of rupture. However, the absolute risk of aneurysm rupture after detection of growth remains unclear.OBJECTIVE To determine the absolute risk of rupture of an aneurysm after detection of growth during follow-up and to develop a prediction model for rupture.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data were obtained from 15 international cohorts. Patients 18 years and older who had follow-up imaging for at least 1 untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm with growth detected at follow-up imaging and with 1 day or longer of follow-up after growth were included. Fusiform or arteriovenous malformation-related aneurysms were excluded. Of the 5166 eligible patients who had follow-up imaging for intracranial aneurysms, 4827 were excluded because no aneurysm growth was detected, and 27 were excluded because they had less than 1 day follow-up after detection of growth.EXPOSURES All included aneurysms had growth, defined as 1 mm or greater increase in 1 direction at follow-up imaging. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was aneurysm rupture. The absolute risk of rupture was measured with the Kaplan-Meier estimate at 3 time points (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) after initial growth. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of rupture after growth detection.RESULTS A total of 312 patients were included (223 [71%] were women; mean [SD] age, 61 [12] years) with 329 aneurysms with growth. During 864 aneurysm-years of follow-up, 25 (7.6%) of these aneurysms ruptured. The absolute risk of rupture after growth was 2.9% (95% CI, 0.9-4.9) at 6 months, 4.3% (95% CI, 1.9-6.7) at 1 year, and 6.0% (95% CI, 2.9-9.1) at 2 years. In multivariable analyses, predictors of rupture were size (7 mm or larger hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-7.2), shape (irregular hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.5), and site (middle cerebral artery hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.8-16.3; anterior cerebral artery, posterior communicating artery, or posterior circulation hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.6-13.0). In the triple-S (size, site, shape) prediction model, the 1-year risk of rupture ranged from 2.1% to 10.6%.CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Within 1 year after growth detection, rupture occurred in approximately 1 of 25 aneurysms. The triple-S risk prediction model can be used to estimate absolute risk of rupture for the initial period after detection of growth.

A lthough aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) accounts for only 3% to 5% of strokes, its profound consequences and unique window of intervention justify its classification as a separate entity.1 Early aneurysm occlusion, expert endovascular neurosurgery and microsurgery, and the use of oral nimodipine and neurointensive care are now standard treatment procedures. 2,3 Nevertheless, aneurysmal SAH is still associated with mortality after 1 month for half of all patients, whereas another quarter is left with disabilities. 1 After aneurysmal SAH, 18% to 56% of patients demonstrate the evidence of secondary ischemia with clinical deterioration, which is also known as delayed ischemic deficit (DID). 4,5 The time lag of 3 to 10 days is unique and offers the potential to intervene before clinical deterioration. Pathologically, the basal subarachnoid distribution of deoxyhemoglobin and early hypoxic-ischemic brain injury contribute to the diffuse distribution of complex biological processes that involve endothelial cells. 6,7 Statin improves endothelial vasomotor function; increases nitric oxide bioavailability; possesses antioxidant properties; counters thrombus formation; induces angiogenesis, endogenous cell proliferation, and neurogenesis; increases the synaptic protein synaptophysin; induces vascular stabilization and neuroblast migration; and suppresses cytokine responses during cerebral ischemia. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Experimental evidence also indicates the benefit of simvastatin in the treatment of aneurysmal SAH. 13 Three randomized placebo-controlled pilot trials have supported the use of statins (2 with 80 mg of simvastatin and 1 with 40 mg of pravastatin) for the treatment of aneurysmal SAH. [14][15][16] In the Duke University Medical Center study, clinical vasospasm was significantly reduced from 60% to 26% by simvastatin treatment (80 mg daily).14 In the Massachusetts General Hospital study, vasospasm-related ischemic infarct was reduced from 25% to 11% by simvastatin treatment (80 mg daily). 16Background and Purpose-Experimental evidence has indicated the benefits of simvastatin for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Two randomized placebo-controlled pilot trials that used the highest clinically approved dose of simvastatin (80 mg daily) gave positive results despite the fact that a lower dose of simvastatin (40 mg daily) did not improve clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that a high dose of 80 mg of simvastatin daily for 3 weeks would reduce the incidence of delayed ischemic deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage compared with a lower dose (40 mg of simvastatin daily) and lead to improved clinical outcomes. Methods-The study design was a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (presenting within 96 hours of the ictus) from 6 neurosurgical centers were recruited for 3 years. The primary outcome measure was the presence of delayed ischemic deficits, and secondary outcome measures included a modified Rankin disability score ...

Background and Purpose— EG-1962 is a sustained release formulation of nimodipine administered via external ventricular drain in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A randomized, open-label, phase 1/2a, dose-escalation study provided impetus for this study to evaluate efficacy and safety of a single intraventricular 600 mg dose of EG-1962 to patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, compared with standard of care oral nimodipine. Methods— Subjects were World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades 2–4, modified Fisher grades 2–4 and had an external ventricular drain inserted as part of standard of care. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with favorable outcome at day 90 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (extended Glasgow outcome scale 6–8). The proportion of subjects with favorable outcome at day 90 on the Montreal cognitive assessment, as well as the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction, use of rescue therapy and safety were evaluated. Results— The study was halted by the independent data monitoring board after planned interim analysis of 210 subjects (289 randomized) with day 90 outcome found the study was unlikely to achieve its primary end point. After day 90 follow-up of all subjects, the proportion with favorable outcome on the extended Glasgow outcome scale was 45% (65/144) in the EG-1962 and 42% (62/145) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.83–1.22], P =0.95). Consistent with its mechanism of action, EG-1962 significantly reduced vasospasm (50% [69/138] EG-1962 versus 63% [91/144], P =0.025) and hypotension (7% [9/138] versus 10% [14/144]). Analysis of prespecified subject strata suggested potential efficacy in World Federation of Neurological Surgeons 3–4 subjects (46% [32/69] EG-1962 versus 32% [24/75] placebo, odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.94–1.58], P =0.13). No safety concerns were identified that halted the study or that preclude further development. Conclusions— There was no significant increase in favorable outcome for EG-1962 compared with standard of care in the overall study population. The safety profile was acceptable. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02790632.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract