Interest in this peculiar but extremely important organism has increased within the past few years. Since Sturges and Rettger (1919) brought out again the outstanding features of this anaerobe, among them that of delayed development in pure culture, investigators have expressed widely different views. An example of the uncertainty concerning the entity of the organism in question is given by the British Medical Research Committee. In their first report on the classification and study of the anaerobes found in war wounds (Special Report Series, No. 12, 1917) certain cultural reactions attributed to it are given rather fully and there is every reason to assume that the committee at that time believed in the existence of a definite species which they were calling Bacillus putrificus. Later (1919) in their Special Report Series, No. 39., they do not make reference to it as a distinct species, but infer that "many of the cultures of B. putrificus, so-called, are really mixtures of B. cochlearius or B. tertius with B. sporogenes." They make no effort to list the cultural characters of the organism, and simply offer a short review of the work of previous investigators, which does not identify it in any way as a distinct species. The Lister Institute (London) does not list cultures of C. putrificum in its National Collection of Type Cultures (1922) and the writers were unable to procure from them any cultures of this organism for comparative studies. Hall has, in a way, shown equal uncertainty in regard to the identity of C. putrificum. In the differential key to the sporulat-375 on September 27, 2020 by guest http://jb.asm.org/ Downloaded from GEORGE F. REDDISH AND LEO F. RETTGER ing obligate anaerobes given in Jordan's General Bacteriology, this key being taken from some of Hall's unpublished data, Jordan puts C. putrificum in a group separate from C. cochlearius,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.