Current benchmark reports of classification algorithms generally concern common classifiers and their variants but do not include many algorithms that have been introduced in recent years. Moreover, important properties such as the dependency on number of classes and features and CPU running time are typically not examined. In this paper, we carry out a comparative empirical study on both established classifiers and more recently proposed ones on 71 data sets originating from different domains, publicly available at UCI and KEEL repositories. The list of 11 algorithms studied includes Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Sparse Representation based Classification (SRC), and Deep Learning (DL), which have not been thoroughly investigated in existing comparative studies. It is found that Stochastic Gradient Boosting Trees (GBDT) matches or exceeds the prediction performance of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests (RF), while being the fastest algorithm in terms of prediction efficiency. ELM also yields good accuracy results, ranking in the top-5 , alongside GBDT, RF, SVM, and C4.5 but this performance varies widely across all data sets. Unsurprisingly, top accuracy performers have average or slow training time efficiency. DL is the worst performer in terms of accuracy but second fastest in prediction efficiency. SRC shows good accuracy performance but it is the slowest classifier in both training and testing.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract-Automatic phone segmentation techniques based on model selection criteria are studied. We investigate the phone boundary detection efficiency of entropy-and Bayesian-based model selection criteria in continuous speech based on the DISTBIC hybrid segmentation algorithm. DISTBIC is a text-independent bottom-up approach that identifies sequential model changes by combining metric distances with statistical hypothesis testing. Using robust statistics and small sample corrections in the baseline DISTBIC algorithm, phone boundary detection accuracy is significantly improved, while false alarms are reduced. We also demonstrate further improvement in phonemic segmentation by taking into account how the model parameters are related in the probability density functions of the underlying hypotheses as well as in the model selection via the information complexity criterion and by employing M-estimators of the model parameters. The proposed DISTBIC variants are tested on the NTIMIT database and the achieved 1 measure is 74.7% using a 20-ms tolerance in phonemic segmentation.