This study describes the ability of acellular nerve allografts (genetically different) to repair injured peripheral nerve in rats and rabbits. We recently reported the regeneration supporting potential and immunogenicity of acellular nerve allografts in rats. The present study extends our previous work and quantitates the extent of axonal regeneration through various nerve grafts in rats. In addition, the use of longer nerve grafts to repair rabbit peripheral nerve is described. Inbred strains of Fischer and Buffalo rats and New Zealand white and Dutch rabbits were used. Acellular grafts were prepared by repeated freezing and thawing of in situ degenerated nerves. Non-frozen predegenerated nerves were used as cellular grafts for comparison. Nerve isografts (genetically identical) were also performed. The graft length was 2.0 cm in rats and 4.0 cm in rabbits. In both rats and rabbits the cellular isografts showed the most rapid regeneration and target muscle innervation. The cellular allografts were invariably rejected and only showed limited regeneration. In contrast, acellular allografts, in spite of their mild immunogenicity, allowed significant regeneration through them. It is concluded that acellular nerve allografts are capable of supporting axonal regeneration because of their reduced immunogenicity, and thus can be used to bridge nerve gaps after nerve injury.
Acellular basal lamina grafts have recently been reported to support axonal regeneration and have been used in peripheral nerve repair. The present study was designed to determine the immunogenicity of such basal lamina allografts (grafts that are genetically different) and their potential as bridging material for nerve gap repair. Inbred strains of Fischer and Buffalo rats with known histocompatibility differences were used. Acellular grafts were prepared by repeated freezing and thawing nerve tissue predegenerated in situ for 6 weeks. Non-frozen predegenerated nerves were used as cellular grafts for comparison. Fischer rats were used as hosts and received cellular or acellular grafts obtained from Fischer (isograft, genetically identical) or Buffalo (allograft) donors. The grafts were evaluated morphologically at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after transplantation. The cellular isografts supported axonal regeneration best. The cellular allografts were invariably rejected and were unsuccessful or only partially successful in supporting regeneration. In contrast, acellular allografts, in spite of their mild immunogenicity were successful in supporting regeneration, as were the acellular isografts. The rate of host axonal regeneration and recovery of target muscle was reduced in acellular allografts and isografts as compared to cellular isografts. It is concluded that acellular allografts are suitable for supporting axonal regeneration and may be used to bridge gaps in injured peripheral nerves.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.