This paper has a dual focus concerning the use of the mirror in making and viewing Renaissance art. It considers the mirror both as an instrument of artistic practice, and as an emblem of pictorial representation within painting. Inaugurated by Brunelleschi's great experiment staged at the door of Florence Cathedral on the one hand, and Van Eyck's Arnolfini Double Portrait on the other, a Renaissance art of mimetic resemblance was predicated on a deeply-worked approximation between the mirror reflection and the theory of painting. This close affinity between the mirror and the painting's surface, as Leonardo's notes make manifest, underpinned both the theory and practice of Renaissance art as constituted in the studied imitation of visual observation. Thus the mirror reflection became, both within the workshop and within representation, the instrument and the definition of what a painting was. Notes The research for this essay was funded by the AHRC. My thanks to Sam Bibby, Sam Cohn, Richard Taws and Jack Warwick for their thoughts and comments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.