Introduction. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the preferred alternative to mastectomy for patients with early stage breast cancer (BC). Randomized trials have confirmed equivalent locoregional control and overall survival for BCS and mastectomy. Extreme Oncoplasty (EO) extends the indications of BCS for patients who would otherwise require mastectomy, ensuring better aesthetic outcomes and oncological safety. Methods. BC patients with multifocal/multicentric (MF/MC) tumors, extensive DCIS, or large tumor >50mm underwent EO at our breast unit. Therapeutic reduction mammaplasty (TRM) with wise pattern preoperative markings and dual pedicle technique involving parenchymal rearrangement was used for oncoplastic reconstructions in majority of the cases followed by RT. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the validated Breast-Q questionnaire. Results. Of the 39 patients in the study, 36 had unilateral and 3 had bilateral BC. Mean age was 47.2 years. Median tumor size was 75mm. 17 (43.6%) patients received NACT; none achieved a complete clinical response. 28 (71.8%) patients were administered to adjuvant chemotherapy. 33(84.6%) patients received RT to the breast with a median dose of 50Gy in 28 fractions and a boost dose of 10Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. No major complications or local recurrences were observed. Excellent Breast-Q scores were observed in patients undergoing EO after 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion. EO followed by RT results in acceptable local-regional control, low rate of complications, and high patient satisfaction. In selected patients, EO could provide a safe alternative for breast conservation surgery instead of mastectomy.
Primary synovial sarcoma of kidney is an uncommon neoplasm, metastasizing most commonly to lung. Surgery and/or palliative chemotherapy for pulmonary metastases is commonly used to improve tumor control and survival. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a relatively new approach to treat pulmonary metastasis, encouraged by the results of cranial and spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. The local control and toxicity profile of patients with pulmonary metastasis treated with SBRT are comparable to pulmonary metastatectomy. Furthermore, with advancement of imaging techniques, immobilization techniques, tumor-tracking techniques, and treatment planning and delivery system, SBRT can now be alternatively employed for the treatment of pulmonary metastasis as a comparable substitute to surgical resection.
Although rare, reports of carcinoma cervix recurring in abdominal incision, episiotomy scars, laparoscopic port sites, and drain sites are available. However, recurrence in the scar of a previous cesarean section (CS) is unreported. A 49-year-old female with a diagnosis of keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of cervix, stage IIB, was treated by radical radiotherapy. She had undergone CS, through midline abdominal incision, for three previous deliveries. Twenty months later, she presented with a nodule of size 2.5 x 2 cm(2) on the 26-year-old abdominal CS scar. Infiltration of the skin and extension into the deeper structures of the abdominal wall was present in an area of 5 x 4 cm(2). There was no evidence of disease on the cervix. A fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination from the nodule revealed keratinizing SCC. Ultrasonography and computerized tomography scan revealed a mass lesion along the abdominal CS scar with subcutaneous nodule and peritoneal extension. Multiple metastatic lesions were present in the liver. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The patient has lived for more than 12.5 months. The first report of recurrence of carcinoma cervix in a CS scar is presented. Literature on surgical scar recurrence in carcinoma cervix is reviewed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.