We studied the pharmacological actions of combined histamine H1/H3 receptor blockade on the increase in nasal airway resistance (NAR) and decrease in nasal cavity volume produced by nasal exposure to compound 48/80, a mast cell degranulator. In the anesthetized cat compound 48/80 (1%) produced a maximum increase in NAR of 9.1 +/- 0.7 cmH20.L/minute. The increase in NAR in animals pretreated with a combination of the H1 antagonist, chlorpheniramine (CTM; 0.8 mg/kg i.v.) and increasing doses of the H3 antagonist, thioperamide (THIO; 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg i.v.) were 6.1 +/- 2.1, 4.2 +/- 1.0 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 cmH20.L/minute, respectively. A second H3 antagonist, clobenpropit (CLOB; 0.03, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) combined with CTM (0.8 mg/kg i.v.) also inhibited the nasal effects of compound 48/80. When the nonsedating H1 antihistamine, loratadine (3.0 mg/kg i.v.), was substituted for CTM, it also reduced nasal congestion when given in combination with THIO (10 mg/kg i.v.). In contrast, treatment with CTM (1.0 mg/kg i.v.) and the H2 antagonist, ranitidine (RAN; 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) were without activity. Loratadine, CTM, CLOB, RAN, or THIO administered alone were inactive. The alpha-adrenergic agonist, phenylpropanolamine (PPA; 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) demonstrated decongestant effects, but in contrast to H1/H3 blockade, PPA produced a significant hypertensive effect. Using acoustic rhinometry (AcR) we found that combined i.v. CTM (1.0 mg/kg) and THIO (10 mg/kg) and combined oral CTM (10 mg/kg) and THIO (30 mg/kg) blocked the decrease in nasal cavity volume produced by intranasal compound 48/80 (1%, 50 microL). We conclude that combined H1/H3 histamine receptor blockade enhances the efficacy of an H1 antagonist by conferring decongestant activity to the H1 antihistamine. We propose that the decongestant activity of combined H1/H3 blockade may provide a novel approach for the treatment of allergic nasal congestion without the hypertensive liability of current therapies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

This is the first report describing the use and pharmacological characterization of nasal patency by both pressure rhinometry and acoustic rhinometry (AcR) in an experimental cat model of nasal congestion. In pressure rhinometry studies, aerosolized compound 48/80 (0.1-3.0%), a mast cell liberator, increased nasal airway resistance (NAR) 1.2 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 0.5, 8.6 +/- 1.1 and 7.9 +/- 1.5 cmH2O.L/minute, respectively. Increases in NAR produced by compound 48/80 were associated with a 395% increase in histamine concentration found in the nasal lavage fluid. Pretreatment with the alpha-adrenoreceptor agonist, phenylpropanolamine (PPA; 0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.v.), and the NO synthetase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NAME; 10 mg/kg, i.v.) attenuated the increases in NAR produced by compound 48/80. The histamine H1 antagonist chlorpheniramine (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and the H2 antagonist, ranitidine (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) had no decongestant activity. Also without decongestant activity were the muscarinic antagonist atropine, the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, and the 5-HT blocker methysergide. Aerosolized histamine (0.1-1.0%) also produced a dose dependent increase in NAR. In studies using acoustic rhinometry (AcR), intranasal application of compound 48/80 (0.1-1.0%) elicited pronounced decreases in nasal cavity volumes and minimum cross-sectional area (Amin). Pretreatment with PPA (3 mg/kg, i.v. or 10 mg/kg, p.o.) attenuated the decreases in nasal volume and Amin. The effects of topical intranasal histamine (0.1-1.0%) on nasal geometry were similar to compound 48/80. We conclude that the cat is a useful model for evaluating the pharmacological actions of potential nasal decongestants. Furthermore, we also conclude that AcR is a useful method for noninvasive assessment of nasal patency in a preclinical setting.

We studied the oral actions of antihistamines from six chemical classes, namely: the ethanolamines (ENA, diphenhydramine and clemastine); ethylenediamines (EDA, pyrilamine and tripelennamine); piperidines (PPD, terfenadine and astemizole); piperazines (PPZ, hydroxyzine and cetirizine); phenothiazines (PTZ, promethazine), and the alkylamines (ALA, chlorpheniramine and bromopheniramine) on cough reflexes, pentobarbital-induced sedation and minute ventilation in the conscious guinea pig. Antihistamines of the ENA class had minimal effects on capsaicin-induced cough although both diphenhydramine (30 and 100 mg/kg p.o.) and clemastine (30 and 100 mg/kg p.o.) increased sedation time (ST). The PPZ class demonstrated both antitussive and sedating activity. The minimum effective oral antitussive dose (MED) of cetirizine and hydroxyzine was 30 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. The EDA did not exhibit antitussive activity. Tripelennamine (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg p.o.) but not pyrilamine enhanced ST. The MED for the PTZ, promethazine, was 10 mg/kg, and at 100 mg/kg promethazine increased ST. The ALA group displayed antitussive activity but only chlorpheniramine (10 mg/kg p.o.) had any effects on ST. The MED for chlorpheniramine and bromopheniramine was 3 and 10 mg/kg p.o., respectively. The PPD antihistamines, namely terfenadine and astemizole, inhibited cough (MED 30 and 10 mg/kg p.o.) without sedative effects. Of the antihistamines tested only promethazine (100 mg/kg p.o.) depressed ventilation responses; however, this dose of promethazine was associated with adverse behavioral effects. The present findings indicate that the antitussive actions of antihistamines are not directly related to histamine H₁-receptor blockade because several antihistamines did not antagonize capsaicin-induced cough. In addition, the antitussive actions of antihistamines are independent of their sedative or ventilation effects.

1 The effects of the GABAB receptor agonists, baclofen and 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid given by the subcutaneous or intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route were examined on minute ventilation (V), tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (f) due to room air and carbon dioxide (CO2)-enriched gas hyperventilation in conscious guinea-pigs.2 Baclofen (0.3-10 mg kg-', s.c.) produced a dose-dependent inhibition of V and f due to room air and CO2 inhalation. The maximum inhibition of room air breathing V was 85% ± 3 and f was 74% 3 at 10 mg kg-1, s.c. The maximum effects on C02-induced hyperventilation were 68% ± 9 and 51% 6, for V and f respectively. Only the highest dose of baclofen studied (10 mg kg-') produced a significant inhibition of VT due to room air breathing (46% ± 6) and CO2 breathing (38% ± 11). 3 3-APPi (0. 7 These results show that baclofen inhibits ventilation due to room air breathing, and attenuates the hyperventilation response to CO2 inhalation. The peripherally acting GABAB agonist, 3-APPi had no effect on ventilation. These findings demonstrate that the respiratory depressant effects of baclofen are due to activation of CNS GABAB receptors and indicates that only GABAB receptor agonists that penetrate into the CNS may cause respiratory depression.

Nonselective adrenergic alpha-agonists such as phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine are widely used as decongestants to treat nasal congestion associated with a variety of nasal diseases. Although the activity of these drugs is well established in clinical studies, a direct comparison of their nasal decongestant effect as determined by changes in nasal cavity dimensions and nasal architecture has not been studied. Using acoustic rhinometry, we evaluated the effects of these drugs on nasal cavity volume, minimum cross-sectional area (Amin), and the distance from the nosepiece to the Amin (Dmin) in a feline, pharmacological model of nasal congestion. Administration of topical compound 48/80 (1%), a mast cell histamine liberator, into the left nasal passageway decreased nasal volume by 66%, reduced Amin by 51%, and increased Dmin by 116%. The congestive responses to compound 48/80 (1%) were reproducible through six weeks. In a subset of cats, the nasal cavity volume effect of repetitive exposure to compound 48/80, given once every two weeks for six weeks, was not different from the nasal responses after the initial exposure to compound 48/80. Pretreatment with oral phenylpropanolamine (10 mg/kg) or oral d-pseudoephedrine (10 mg/kg) attenuated the nasal effects of compound 48/80, but were associated with a pronounced increase in systolic blood pressure of +51 and +82 mmHg, respectively. A similar decongestant profile was observed with phenylpropanolamine (1%) and d-pseudoephedrine (1%) when given topically. Topical phenylpropanolamine (1%) and d-pseudoephedrine (1%) 45 minutes after dosing increased blood pressure +44 and +17 mmHg, respectively, over control animals. We conclude that oral and topical phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine display equieffective nasal decongestant activity and produce similar cardiovascular profiles characterized by significant increases in blood pressure.