Natural antimicrobial compounds perform their action mainly against cell membranes. The aim of this work was to evaluate the interaction, meant as a mechanism of action, of essential oil antimicrobial compounds with the microbial cell envelope. The lipid profiles of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Brochothrix thermosphacta cells treated with thymol, carvacrol, limonene, eugenol, and cinnamaldehyde have been analyzed by gas chromatography. In line with the fatty acids analysis, the treated cells were also observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate structural alterations. The overall results showed a strong decrease of the unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) for the treated cells; in particular, the C18:2trans and C18:3cis underwent a notable reduction contributing to the total UFA decreases, while the saturated fatty acid C17:0 raised the highest concentration in cinnamaldehyde-treated cells. SEM images showed that the used antimicrobial compounds quickly exerted their antimicrobial activities, determining structural alterations of the cell envelope.
Major active compounds from essential oils are well-known to possess antimicrobial activity against both pathogen and spoilage microorganisms. The aim of this work was to determine the alteration of the membrane fatty acid profile as an adaptive mechanism of the cells in the presence of a sublethal concentration of antimicrobial compound in response to a stress condition. Methanolic solutions of thymol, carvacrol, limonene, cinnamaldehyde, and eugenol were added into growth media of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Brochothrix thermosphacta, and Staphylococcus aureus strains. Fatty acid extraction and gas chromatographic analysis were performed to assess changes in membrane fatty acid composition. Substantial changes were observed on the long chain unsaturated fatty acids when the E. coli and Salmonella strains grew in the presence of limonene and cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol and eugenol, respectively. All compounds influenced the fatty acid profile of B. thermosphacta, while Pseudomonas and S. aureus strains did not show substantial changes in their fatty acid compositions.
The extent to which a bacterial cocktail containing equal numbers of Pseudomonas fragi NCTC 10689, Listeria monocytogenes BL5/2, Salmonella Typhimurium LT2, and Escherichia coli JM 109 attached to loin surface cuts (7 by 5 cm) derived from steam-pasteurized beef carcasses has been evaluated. The extent of attachment was categorized as loosely attached (removed by rinsing), firmly attached (released by stomaching), and irreversibly bound. No significant difference (P > 0.10) in the attachment of bacteria to steam-pasteurized carcasses was found compared with control loin samples that had received no treatment. No significant difference (P > 0.05) was also found in the attachment strength between the different bacterial species tested. Most bacteria inoculated onto the loin cuts were reversibly bound, since they had been removed by rinsing and stomaching. The irreversible attachment of bacteria to loin cuts was found to vary significantly (P < 0.01) among the different carcass sets used but was independent of whether the carcass had undergone steam pasteurization treatment. Use of a bioluminescent strain of E. coli showed that cells bound preferentially to cut edges and convoluted areas on the loin surface and could not be removed by rinsing. The possible mechanisms of bacterial attachment and the suitability of steam pasteurization to remove contamination incurred during slaughter are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.