Thoracoabdominal extent of the aneurysmal aortic disease is the most important predictor of ARM in unrepaired DT or TA aortic diseases. Mortality from aortic-related events was significantly more premature than mortality from non-aortic-related mortality.

Background:To analyze the prevalence and predictors of prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) in a multicenter registry.Methods: This registry-based, multicenter study retrospectively evaluated PVGI that developed after infrainguinal revascularization performed with a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft that was used in 1400 interventions between 2002 and 2016. A prosthetic graft with infection was defined as direct involvement of the graft with positive bacterial cultures of graft or perigraft material, intraoperative gross purulence or failure of graft incorporation, or exposed graft in an infected wound.Results: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) was the main indication for bypass (n ¼ 915 [65%]). The median duration of follow-up was 29 months (range, 1-168 months; interquartile range, 12-60 months). A total of 33 heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (2.3%) became infected; the median time to occurrence was 5 months (range, 1-54 months; interquartile range; 2.00-13.25 months). Freedom from PVGI at 1 year was 98% (standard error, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 97.2-98.9), and 97% (standard error, 0.6; 95% CI, 95.6-98.0) at 5 years. The multivariate model identified CLI (P ¼ .042; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.164-0.969) to be independently associated with PVGI. In-hospital mortality of PVGI treatment was 12% (n ¼ 4/33). Freedom from major amputation was significantly different between patients with PVGI and those who did not experience this complication (at 1 year, 67.0% vs 88.5%; Log-rank c 2 ¼ 22.5; P ¼ .001).Conclusions: In our "real-world" multicenter experience the prevalence of PVGI after infrainguinal femoropopliteal bypasses was relatively low at 2.3%, but still associated with significant mortality and limb loss. CLI was the only significant predictor of PVGI. This conclusion is reasonable; however, more comprehensive data are required to confirm these findings, because the presence of ischemic ulcers or gangrene was not predictive of PVGI.

To analyze outcomes following major lower extremity amputations (mLEAs) for peripheral arterial obstructive disease, gangrene, infected non-healing wound and to create a risk prediction scoring system for 30-day mortality. In this single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. All patients treated with above-the-knee amputation (AKA) or below-the-knee amputation (BKA) between January 1st, 2010 and June 30th, 2018 were identified. The primary outcome of interest was early (≤ 30 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and freedom from amputation stump revision/failure. We identified 310 (77.7%) mLEAs performed on 286 patients. There were 188 (65.7%) men and 98 (34.3%) women with a median age of 79 years (IQR, 69–83 years). We performed 257 (82.9%) AKA and 53 (17.1%) BKA. There were 49 (15.8%) early deaths, which did not differ among the age quartiles of this cohort (15.4% vs. 14.3% vs. 15.4% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.826). Binary logistic regression analysis identified age > 80 years (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.17–4.31; P = 0.015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.11–4.06; P = 0.023), and hemodialysis (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15–5.52; P = 0.021) to be associated with early mortality. The final score (range 0–10) identified two subgroups with different mortality at 30 days: lower-risk (score < 4, 10.8%), and higher-risk (score ≥ 4: 28.7%; OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.63–6.32; P < 0.001). In our experience, mLEAs still have a 14% mortality rate over the years. Our lower-risk group (score < 4) is characterized by a lower rate of perioperative death and longer survival. Graphic abstract

No abstract

Aim: In the present study, we analysed the learning curve of prosthetic vascular access creation. Materials and methods: The first 50 consecutive prosthetic vascular access created by a single experienced vascular surgeon was included in this study. Primary outcomes were operative time, intervention-free access survival and functional access survival. Additional outcomes were complications of the intervention. We used the cumulative sum technique to assess the learning curve. Results: The analysis of the learning curve obtained with cumulative sum technique on operative time, interventionfree survival and functional access survival permitted to define three phases: learning (first 25 patients), expertise (following 15 patients) and post-learning phase. Accordingly, statistical differences were observed in operative time, intervention-free survival, and frequencies of graft thrombosis among the three groups. Conclusion: Prosthetic vascular access creation is a safe and effective intervention when performed by an experienced vascular surgeon. Otherwise, a twenty-five interventions learning curve is mandatory to obtain better results in terms of operative time, circuit survival and frequency of thrombosis. Additional fifteen interventions are required to obtain an expert level of practice, allowing for more challenging procedure.