Objective To verify the association between cooking habits, socioeconomic data, and food choices of individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus during the pandemic of COVID-19. Methods Transversal study with individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus carried out in July 2020. Socioeconomic data and information about social distancing and food practices were collected with an online form. The research was approved by the university’s Ethics and Research Committee (Process number 4.147.663). Results Out of the 472 participants, 50.9% reported that they have been cooking more during the pandemic. An association between cooking more and having a university degree (p<0.000) was observed. Not being able to comply with social distancing rules because of work necessities was associated with not cooking (p=0.006). Cooking more during the quarantine was associated with eating less than five meals per day (p=0.04), having an appropriate consumption of fruits (p=0.02) and vegetables (p=0.04), and increased water intake (p=0.01). Conclusion In Brazil, the habit of cooking during the pandemic may represent an increase in domestic work, reinforced by social inequalities. Therefore, comprehending the cooking habits and food choices of people with diabetes may widen the perspectives of health professionals involved in the treatment of the disease and contribute to the elaboration of public policies that take the country's inequalities into account. We emphasize the importance of investing in policies that encourage the development of culinary skills, as well as the habit of cooking as part of the actions of Food and Nutrition Education.

To control glycemic variability in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), it is essential to perform carbohydrate counting (CC), a strategy that ensures better quality of life for these patients. Thus, this study aims to analyze potential factors associated with adherence to CC in adults with T1DM during social distancing due to COVID-19 in Brazil. This was a single cross-sectional study carried out in July 2020. An online form was used to collect sociodemographic and economic data on the purchasing of supplies and food, as well as social distancing. The Chi-square test was performed with adjusted residuals analysis and a binomial logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05). Of 472 adults, 37.71% reported performing CC in the same frequency as before social distancing. There was an association between performance of CC and the type of city (p = 0.027), family income (p = 0.000), use of financial emergency aid (p = 0.045), type of insulin administration and glycemic monitoring (p < 0.000), and cooking more (p = 0.012). Participants who maintained or reduced consumption of ultra-processed foods were 0.62 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 0.626, 95% IC: 0.419–0.935) and participants who cooked more were 1.67 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.146–2.447). There are still people with T1DM who did not know about and did not use CC method, which highlights the need for diabetes education.

A lack of glycemic control and diabetes are risk factors for complications related to COVID-19, and social isolation can hinder adherence to physical activity. Thus, this study sought to assess the impacts of social distancing on the practice of physical activity of individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). This was a transversal study carried out using an online form to collect sociodemographic, practice of physical activity, and social distancing data. Of the 472 participants, 85.6% reported that they were respecting the steps of social distancing. Social distancing affected the practice of physical activity in adherence to the habit of practicing in frequency, duration, and perception of change in intensity. An association was found between noticing a lot of stress in the home environment and stopping physical activity; lower levels of tolerance to social distancing were associated with less physical activity, and maintaining the habit of practicing physical activity was associated with decreasing the intensity of the practice. Hence, social distancing harmed the practice of physical activity as part of the treatment of individuals with T1DM, both in the habit of practicing and in the characteristics of these practices of physical activity, such as frequency, duration, and intensity.

The social isolation carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to physical inactivity and impacted people’s mental health, with physical activity being an important pillar in the treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). Thus, this study aims to verify whether there is an association between the perception of mental health and the practice of physical activity in individuals with T1DM during social isolation in the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in July 2020, with 472 adults with T1DM, using an online form to collect sociodemographic, mental health and physical activity data during social isolation. The Chi-Square test of independence was performed with adjusted residuals analysis (p < 0.05). A total of 51.3% of the participants remained sedentary or stopped doing physical activity during the period of social isolation. There was an association between being interested in performing daily activities (p = 0.003), not feeling depressed (p = 0.001), feeling slightly irritated (p = 0.006), having slight problems with sleep (p = 0.012) and practicing physical activity. There was also an association between maintaining physical activity and not feeling depressed (p = 0.017) and feeling very slightly irritated (p = 0.040). Adults with T1DM who practiced physical activity during the period of social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic showed better aspects of mental health.

Objetivo: Buscou-se analisar o uso do auxílio emergencial na aquisição de insumos para o tratamento por adultos com Diabetes Tipo 1 durante o distanciamento social pela pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil. Métodos: Pesquisa transversal, realizada em julho de 2020, no Brasil, através de um formulário online sobre dados socioeconômicos, demográficos, monitorização glicêmica e aquisição de insumos. Foi aplicado o teste Qui-Quadrado de Pearson, com análise de resíduos ajustados (p<0,05). Resultados: Participaram 472 adultos, dos quais 39,19% relataram ter recebido o auxílio emergencial do Governo Federal. Receber o auxílio estava associado a não ter ensino superior (p<0,000), morar em bairros de periferia (p<0,000), ter tido a renda reduzida durante a pandemia (p=0,001) e ter renda familiar de até 2 salários mínimos (p=0,000). A maioria usou o auxílio para o pagamento de contas básicas (57,5%) e compra de alimentos (43,8%). Conclusões: Usar o auxílio para comprar insumos do tratamento estava associado a adquiri-los com dinheiro próprio ou por doação e não gastar o auxílio com insumos estava associado a adquiri-los por meio do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). O auxílio emergencial foi utilizado para aquisição de insumos essenciais ao tratamento e necessidades básicas, especialmente em pessoas com piores condições socioeconômicas e que não conseguiram adquirir estes materiais pelo SUS.