BackgroundHerpes zoster (HZ) is a significant cause of morbidity and complications in adult renal transplant recipients. We determined the incidence, complications and risk factors for the development of HZ after renal transplantation in a setting using universal antiviral prophylaxis.MethodsThe medical files of all adult renal transplants, performed between 2004 and 2008, were retrospectively reviewed to assess the clinical characteristics and risk factors of HZ. Incident cases of HZ were determined and the probability of developing post-transplant HZ for all subjects was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was applied to assess the risk factors associated with the development of HZ.ResultsA total of 450 patients were eligible with a median follow up of 38 months. Twenty nine subjects (6.4 %) developed HZ, the median time to onset was 18 months, only three of them (10.3 %) required hospitalization, and none developed disseminated or visceral disease and death directly attributed to zoster. However, high rates of post-herpetic neuralgia (48.7 %) were observed. Overall incidence was calculated at 20.6 cases per 1000 patient-years of follow-up. Following multivariate analysis, increased age ≥ 60 years old, positive pre-transplant history of varicella related disease and administration of rejection treatment conferred an increased risk of 4.00-fold (CI: 1.79- 8.92), 16.00-fold (CI: 4.62- 55.52), and 5.57-fold (CI: 1.56- 19.84) respectively, for the development of post-transplant zoster.ConclusionsHZ remains a common complication after renal transplantation in adults under current immunosuppession protocols and universal antiviral prophylaxis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1038-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Renal transplant lithiasis requires vigilance, a high index of suspicion, prompt recognition, and management. Treatment protocols should mimic those for solitary kidneys. Minimally invasive techniques are available to remove graft calculi. Long-term follow-up is essential to determine the outcome, as well as to prevent recurrence.
Introduction: Renal hemorrhage is a major life-threatening condition that can be caused by trauma, operation, biopsy, as well as sudden spontaneous rupture of renal tumors or aneurysms. We report our experience with superselective segmental renal artery catheterization and embolization as therapeutic options for such cases. Patients and Methods: Over the last 8 years, 28 patients with severe renal hemorrhage were admitted for evaluation and possible further treatment. Twenty of them had a history of previous biopsy (6 of them one of a transplanted kidney), 1 patient had a recent percutaneous nephrostomy, 4 patients presented with renal mass ruptures (2 patients renal cell carcinoma, 1 patient angiomyolipoma, 1 patient hemorrhagic cysts), 1 patient had rupture of a renal aneurysm during delivery, 1 patient suffered bleeding after partial nephrectomy, and 1 patient was hospitalized after a car accident. They all presented with clinical signs of hemodynamic instability. Angiographic investigation of the kidneys preceded further intervention in all cases. 26 out of the 28 patients underwent superselective embolization of the specific bleeding vessel with the use of microcoils and/or Gelfoam particles. Results: All patients treated by superselective segmental renal artery embolization had a successful outcome, including a steady renal function and a stable clinical course. No complications occurred. Conclusion: Superselective segmental renal artery catheterization and embolization is a safe and efficient method for the treatment of patients with severe renal hemorrhage, preserving healthy renal parenchyma and renal function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.